I've never heard of that. From what I've seen in history, it seems to me that a lack of minimum wage has people working under slave conditions that are deeply impoverished.
I'm curious about your take, and I've got a legit question. Could you cite anything from Karl Mark or historical communist thought leaders in support of a minimum wage? I know that modern socialists laud wage minimums that seem exorbitant by today's standards, but I think a lot of that is to influence the working class to support them and their ideas.
CON (together with) SPIRO (to breathe)...being implies breathing apart from one another. Few suggest conspiracy to tempt consenting many to "breathe" life into an inversion of living.
a) Is one free to perceive or are there any restrictions upon perception?
b) If one "pays" by consenting to a suggestion "sold" by another, then that implies a market...doesn't it?
c) How is consenting to another not restricting ones "free" will of choice through a "market-contract" with another?
d) Stupid/stupor/stop implies "cessation of motion"...there cannot exist a cessation of motion (inception towards death) for matter (life) within, since motion generates matter.
How is any of this obtuse (stupid in the revisionist sense)?
There is a conspiracy to deliberately make people poorer than they would be in an actual free market.
Correct. Abolish the minimum wage.
I believe that would amount to adjuisting it down to zero and causing great harm to working people.
Explain how removing communism would harm working people.
I've never heard of that. From what I've seen in history, it seems to me that a lack of minimum wage has people working under slave conditions that are deeply impoverished.
I'm curious about your take, and I've got a legit question. Could you cite anything from Karl Mark or historical communist thought leaders in support of a minimum wage? I know that modern socialists laud wage minimums that seem exorbitant by today's standards, but I think a lot of that is to influence the working class to support them and their ideas.
Consenting to market binds free.
CON (together with) SPIRO (to breathe)...being implies breathing apart from one another. Few suggest conspiracy to tempt consenting many to "breathe" life into an inversion of living.
This is so stupid. Please stop.
a) Is one free to perceive or are there any restrictions upon perception?
b) If one "pays" by consenting to a suggestion "sold" by another, then that implies a market...doesn't it?
c) How is consenting to another not restricting ones "free" will of choice through a "market-contract" with another?
d) Stupid/stupor/stop implies "cessation of motion"...there cannot exist a cessation of motion (inception towards death) for matter (life) within, since motion generates matter.
How is any of this obtuse (stupid in the revisionist sense)?
ITT: People who don't understand the difference between wealth and wages
Suggested pluralism (people) and nihilism (don't) tempting one to devalue self by consenting to another.
Who? Why does it matter?
It matters because it shows you do not fundamentally understand why poor people are poor.
I completely understand those concepts.
Does giving away free imply theft?
Would you not pollute what I write please?