You can keep manufacturing excuses for your failed religion but it does not change the fact that stars should be visible when there is nothing else in the frame. Just admit you were told idiotic Jesuit lies and you believed it, it's time to move on into reality.
But there is something in this frame and you still said it's proof it's fake. Which means you obviously know jack shit about cameras and photography, which means you're not qualified to interpret any other photos either.
I said reflected sunlight from a cloth suit that would never protect you from being in a zero air pressure environment and itself reveals that NASA is a fraud is not brighter than a streetlight.
You can keep manufacturing excuses for your failed religion but it does not change the fact that stars should be visible when there is nothing else in the frame. Just admit you were told idiotic Jesuit lies and you believed it, it's time to move on into reality.
But there is something in this frame and you still said it's proof it's fake. Which means you obviously know jack shit about cameras and photography, which means you're not qualified to interpret any other photos either.
you do not know jack about this fake "photo" you are making wild assumptions to protect your religious beliefs.
I look at it and see fraud, so then I look at the hundreds of other photos and see the same fraud.
You are under satanic mind control.
You said sunlight is dimmer than a streetlight.
It's hard to win a debate with a smart person. But it's impossible to win a debate with an idiot. Good day to you sir.
I said reflected sunlight from a cloth suit that would never protect you from being in a zero air pressure environment and itself reveals that NASA is a fraud is not brighter than a streetlight.