I said reflected sunlight from a cloth suit that would never protect you from being in a zero air pressure environment and itself reveals that NASA is a fraud is not brighter than a streetlight.
So just to confirm then.... You are officially abandoning your entire argument for why this photo is fake (the lack of stars) and pivoting to something entirely new?
Nope, I am saying my opinion is that the suit that would not protect your from zero air pressure is not bright enough to make all the starts that should be in the background disappear. This opinion is created based on the hundreds of other examples where stars should be visible but they are not because it is impossible to fake it.
Your opinion is that someone floating around in a cloth suit in zero air pressure is reflecting light and that is why stars that should be there are not visible.
You said sunlight is dimmer than a streetlight.
It's hard to win a debate with a smart person. But it's impossible to win a debate with an idiot. Good day to you sir.
I said reflected sunlight from a cloth suit that would never protect you from being in a zero air pressure environment and itself reveals that NASA is a fraud is not brighter than a streetlight.
So just to confirm then.... You are officially abandoning your entire argument for why this photo is fake (the lack of stars) and pivoting to something entirely new?
Nope, I am saying my opinion is that the suit that would not protect your from zero air pressure is not bright enough to make all the starts that should be in the background disappear. This opinion is created based on the hundreds of other examples where stars should be visible but they are not because it is impossible to fake it.
Your opinion is that someone floating around in a cloth suit in zero air pressure is reflecting light and that is why stars that should be there are not visible.
Your belief is irrational from my perspective.
then do the street light picture or go away.
proof or gtfo