Have you ever actually read the original writings of theosophists and gnostics? They talk about how everything is a manifestation of God, how there is only one God, etc. How can that be different from the monotheistic god of any of the religions?

Yes, and the Devil is actually the ancient sumerian Ba'al Principality, the demon god of 1000 faces.

All ancient Pagan gods are the fallen ones aka demons, that the New Age Theosophists worship.

The Esoteric Meaning of Lucifer

Alice and Foster Bailey were serious students and teachers of Theosophy, a spiritual tradition which views Lucifer as one of the solar Angels, those advanced Beings Who Theosophy says descended (thus “the fall”) from Venus to our planet eons ago to bring the principle of mind to what was then animal-man. In the theosophical perspective, the descent of these solar Angels was not a fall into sin or disgrace but rather an act of great sacrifice, as is suggested in the name “Lucifer” which means light-bearer.

Source: https://www.lucistrust.org/arcane_school/talks_and_articles/the_esoteric_meaning_lucifer

In gnosticism there is this idea of a "demiurge" yaldabaoth which created our physical universe to use the beings within as slaves.

The fake ass "demiurge" creator entity is actually identified as Saturn/Satan, and his abomination of a mother Sophia is identified as Venus/Lucifer.

Luciferianism, the New Age Movement - Russ Dizdar (2011) https://rumble.com/v335tw8-russ-dizdar-luciferianism-the-new-age-movement-audio.html

real patron god is Baal/Yahweh

Mystery Babylon's demonic patron god is actually Enki/Ea/Ba'al/Nimrod/Tammuz/Marduk/Shamash/Gilgamesh/Saturn

The Anunnaki are actually the ancient fallen ones, and the Gilgamesh flood myth is a big fucking pagan lie.

It was the most high almighty creator God who destroyed all godless humans who created the Nephilim (Giants) abominations in the Great Flood, fallen angels (demons) never had any dominion over this realm.

Buddhism is interesting in that we recognize beings that could be called gods exist, we just don't think they merit worship. The Buddha's final words were "work out your own salvation with diligence."

What about the luciferian Cathar sect of the 10th-late13th century?

LUCIFERIANISM IN THE 13TH CENTURY - A FORGOTTEN OFF-SHOOT OF CATHARISM

The Luciferian heresy appeared for the first time in the 13th century in the area round Cologne, Mainz and Trier in the Rheinland. Contemporary records suggest that its followers believed Lucifer to be a benevolent deity, unjustly banished from his heavenly kingdom. They looked forward to the moment when he would eventually reclaim his rightful position and believed that it could be hastened by their fasts and ascetic practices. So far students of medieval heresies have been sceptical about the actual existence of Luciferianism and regarded it as a fiction invented by the Inquisition to smear and utterly discredit some heterodox Christians. The view that the Luciferian heresy was no more than perfidious mud-slinging is based primarily on the records of investigations by Conrad of Marburg and his collaborators, an inquisitorial team notorious for extricating self-incriminating evidence from innocent suspects.The aim of this paper is, first, to challenge the view that Luciferianism was a mere invention of the inquisitors and, second, to find out what its characteristic traits may reveal about its origins as well as affinities and links with other heretical movements of the Middle Ages. A careful analysis of a broader range of sources - especially Pope Gregory IX's bull 'Vox in Rama', the testimony of a heretic named Lepzet, and several entries in German chronicles - reveals significant similarities between Luciferianism and Provençal Catharism on the level of doctrine, ritual and organization of the community. As in the case of Catharism, the beliefs ascribed to the Luciferians seem to represent a clear continuation of the legacy of Gnosticism. In consequence, the view that Luciferianism was but a figment of the inquisitorial imagination needs to be revised.

AKA ORDER OF THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR BUTT BUDDIES

First Crusade: Urban 2 called for a holy war army to defeat the Muslims who had captured the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. He promised absolution for all their sins for those who would go to fight the Muslims. It promoted a salvation fervor throughout Europe. Sinners without money by the thousands joined to kill Muslims. Christian mobs slaughtered thousands of Jews and stole their wealth on the way to Palestine. (There were 7 crusades 1096-1270 + the Cathars). Urban also decreed that those who died in such battle would be martyrs & go to Heaven, like the Koran’s promise to its martyrs. In 1099, Crusaders captured Jerusalem, torturing and slaughtering 30,000 to 40,000 Jews and Muslims, men, women and children. Urban 2’s Pax Ecclesiae / Peace of the Church banned fighting near churches, harming clerics, pilgrims, women, or peasants. Due largely to bequests, bishops became great landowners, feudal lords.

SOURCE: https://erenow.org/postclassical/the-real-history-behind-the-templars/42.php

I Rebuke all you sanat (satan) kumara worshipers in the name of YAHshua HaMashiach!

I don't trust Rudolf Steiner's ideology at all, check out Alexander Hislop's book The Two Babylons, buddy.

Wilkinson states that Anubis and his scales are often represented; and that in some cases there is some difference in the details. But it is evident from his statements, that the principle in all is the same. The following is the account which he gives of one of these judgment scenes, previous to the admission of the dead to Paradise: "Cerberus is present as the guardian of the gates, near which the scales of justice are erected; and Anubis, the director of the weight, having placed a vase representing the good actions of the deceased in one scale, and the figure or emblem of truth in the other, proceeds to ascertain his claims for admission. If, on being weighed, he is found wanting, he is rejected, and Osiris, the judge of the dead, inclining his sceptre in token of condemnation, pronounces judgment upon him, and condemns his soul to return to earth under the form of a pig or some unclean animal...But if, when the SUM of his deeds are recorded by Thoth [who stands by to mark the results of the different weighings of Anubis], his virtues so far PREDOMINATE as to entitle him to admission to the mansions of the blessed, Horns, taking in his hand the tablet of Thoth, introduces him to the presence of Osiris, who, in his palace, attended by Isis and Nepthys, sits on his throne in the midst of the waters, from which rises the lotus, bearing upon its expanded flowers the four Genii of Amenti." The same mode of symbolising the justification by works had evidently been in use in Babylon itself; and, therefore, there was great force in the Divine handwriting on the wall, when the doom of Belshazzar went forth: "Tekel," "Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting." In the Parsee system, which has largely borrowed from Chaldea, the principle of weighing the good deeds over against the bad deeds is fully developed. "For three days after dissolution," says Vaux, in his Nineveh and Persepolis, giving an account of Parsee doctrines in regard to the dead, "the soul is supposed to flit round its tenement of clay, in hopes of reunion; on the fourth, the Angel Seroch appears, and conducts it to the bridge of Chinevad. On this structure, which they assert connects heaven and earth, sits the Angel of Justice, to weigh the actions of mortals; when the good deeds prevail, the soul is met on the bridge by a dazzling figure, which says, 'I am thy good angel, I was pure originally, but thy good deeds have rendered me purer'; and passing his hand over the neck of the blessed soul, leads it to Paradise. If iniquities preponderate, the soul is meet by a hideous spectre, which howls out, 'I am thy evil genius; I was impure from the first, but thy misdeeds have made me fouler; through thee we shall remain miserable until the resurrection'; the sinning soul is then dragged away to hell, where Ahriman sits to taunt it with its crimes." Such is the doctrine of Parseeism.

"illuminated" and made partakers of a "divine nature," after being "divested of their garments," were clothed anew, the garments with which they were invested were looked upon as "sacred garments," and possessing distinguished virtues. "The coat of skin" with which the Father of mankind was divinely invested after he was made so painfully sensible of his nakedness, was, as all intelligent theologians admit, a typical emblem of the glorious righteousness of Christ—"the garment of salvation," which is "unto all and upon all them that believe." The garments put upon the initiated after their disrobing of their former clothes, were evidently intended as a counterfeit of the same. "The garments of those initiated in the Eleusinian Mysteries," says Potter, "were accounted sacred, and of no less efficacy to avert evils than charms and incantations. They were never cast off till completely worn out." And of course, if possible, in these "sacred garments" they were buried; for Herodotus, speaking of Egypt, whence these mysteries were derived, tells us that "religion" prescribed the garments of the dead. The efficacy of "sacred garments" as a means of salvation and delivering from evil in the unseen and eternal world, occupies a foremost place in many religions. Thus the Parsees, the fundamental elements of whose system came from the Chaldean Zoroaster, believe that "the saclra or sacred vest" tends essentially to "preserve the departed soul from the calamities accruing from Ahriman," or the Devil;

Looks like Ahriman is just another aspect of the devil, who literally has 1000 faces.

Lucifer is the archangel that fell from Heaven

There is no difference between Saturn/Satan and Venus/Lucifer the false light bringer, they are both the same fallen entity in my eyes.