Stanley Kubrick was the best director of all time
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (338)
sorted by:
Mythbusters disproved this theory with simple prop building. They exactly replicated the 'non-parallel' shadows using terrain features and elevation. This picture doesn't prove what you think it proves.
Fake moon landing hoaxers glow just about as bright as the flat-earthers. No one with any critical thinking skills would even consider the moon landings fake.
Because what purpose did it serve? To make Americans feel good about themselves? How does that help the Jews/Lizards? What is the goal of this supposed propaganda? Why would the Soviet Union participate in this?
And that's not even getting into the physical evidence or the evidence from other countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
In short, fake moon landing posts are a discrediting psyop to make 'normies' think these sites are untrustworthy.
I used to align with your perspective until I peaked into the rabbit hole and accidentally stumbled down.
Assuming you’re arguing in good faith (and I believe you are), do please give the first 30 minutes or so of this documentary a chance.
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY
Glow harder. American Moon only looks at the photographic evidence. There is so much more than simply photos.
And American Moon gets the photo analysis wrong, see Glyn Williams answer here - https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-do-you-think-about-massimo-mazucco-s-document-am%C3%A9rican-Moon-and-the-experts-of-photography-inside-saying-Apollo-photos-were-really-too-clear-to-be-Taken-in-the-moon-see-my-answer
So no, that video is not convincing at all.
My mistake. You’re not posting here sincerely.
https://www.luogocomune.net/american-moon-42-questions
1-4 don't understand that exposure is related to time. High doses are survivable for short periods. They are still more likely to have mutations. It's not 'safe'. But it's survivable for short times. https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2022/fesearchers-find-spaceflight-may-be-associated-with-dna-mutations-and-increased-risk-of-developing-heart-disease-and-cancer
5-9 don't understand that moon dust isn't the same as what we have on earth. It doesn't act the same.
10 there is a flame, it's just not in contiuous operation like in testing. We see the jet shoot out from under the module then ascend.
11-13 Mics don't pick up audio that's outside their frequency range. Why would the people on the ground want to hear the engine noises in comms?
14 0.9 of a second? These people have never communicated using radio. Try listening to HAM sometimes.
15-16 just made up nonesense. There's no wind on the moon. It doesn't need stabilization.
17-20 more dust misconceptions
21 why would flashes of light indicate a sound stage? Wouldn't they indicate an un-controlled environment, say, like the moon?
22 low gravity, momentum
23 momentum exists with or without air
24 ....I'm just going to stop there. this is obviously put together by CIA to convince morons who don't understand physics.
Mythbusters? Haaha.
What's next? Snopes? 😅
What's next, more alts?
The experiment they did can be done by anyone. Science that you don't like is still science.
😂
It was real in my mind!
Thanks for admitting the white man went to the Moon. Nothing you say or do will ever change this.
mythbusters is controlled by the media. They deliberately mucked up their oxyhydron generator to pretend it doesn't work. There are literally entire police stations which converted their whole fleet.
Where?
Cars running on hydrogen is a thing. Generating enough hydrogen to run the car using an on-board generator is busted.
From your replies I do not think you are an organic user. Fuck off
Negative, I am a meat popsicle.
From YOUR replies, I DO think you are a liar that doesn't have any sources.
Where's your Tumblr about flat earth? You gonna post that next?
"trust the science" is an oxymoron. No one trusts 'science'. We don't have to. The whole point is making predictions then testing those predictions until the confidence level of the results is acceptable. Then others do the same to verify.
We landed on the moon. Anyone who says otherwise is either a complete moron or alphabet soup goon.
The white man walked on the Moon and there’s nothing you can say or do to change that.
You think I got that knowledge from the US Gov?
You really are a smoothbrain.