Stanley Kubrick was the best director of all time
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (338)
sorted by:
I used to align with your perspective until I peaked into the rabbit hole and accidentally stumbled down.
Assuming you’re arguing in good faith (and I believe you are), do please give the first 30 minutes or so of this documentary a chance.
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY
Glow harder. American Moon only looks at the photographic evidence. There is so much more than simply photos.
And American Moon gets the photo analysis wrong, see Glyn Williams answer here - https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-do-you-think-about-massimo-mazucco-s-document-am%C3%A9rican-Moon-and-the-experts-of-photography-inside-saying-Apollo-photos-were-really-too-clear-to-be-Taken-in-the-moon-see-my-answer
So no, that video is not convincing at all.
My mistake. You’re not posting here sincerely.
https://www.luogocomune.net/american-moon-42-questions
1-4 don't understand that exposure is related to time. High doses are survivable for short periods. They are still more likely to have mutations. It's not 'safe'. But it's survivable for short times. https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2022/fesearchers-find-spaceflight-may-be-associated-with-dna-mutations-and-increased-risk-of-developing-heart-disease-and-cancer
5-9 don't understand that moon dust isn't the same as what we have on earth. It doesn't act the same.
10 there is a flame, it's just not in contiuous operation like in testing. We see the jet shoot out from under the module then ascend.
11-13 Mics don't pick up audio that's outside their frequency range. Why would the people on the ground want to hear the engine noises in comms?
14 0.9 of a second? These people have never communicated using radio. Try listening to HAM sometimes.
15-16 just made up nonesense. There's no wind on the moon. It doesn't need stabilization.
17-20 more dust misconceptions
21 why would flashes of light indicate a sound stage? Wouldn't they indicate an un-controlled environment, say, like the moon?
22 low gravity, momentum
23 momentum exists with or without air
24 ....I'm just going to stop there. this is obviously put together by CIA to convince morons who don't understand physics.
If it's any consolation man, I could only make it through half of American Moon... which, talk about not posting sincerely - the documentary isn't sincere with the evidence it presents to back its arguments. Much left out of context... anyway all it did was strengthen my resolve that men walked on the moon. If nothing else, the documentary affirms that we've at least sent probes to the moon that have returned, and we've left experimental stuff there... but for some reason we didn't do a manned mission like all of the evidence suggests.
But yea all that shit about dust not behaving the same and "no engine flame" - which is explained by this video where you see the engine fire (with flame) initially to launch, then they let momentum carry them away, then you see the engine fire again when they do a full burn to accelerate away and rendezvous with the lunar orbiter.