Communists did emulate Christian ideas but of course inverted it all, that part is true. The rest is bs.
famine, death, destruction, regression of humanity into ape-men.
I'm not sure what timeline you come from, but that's not what Christianity is about. This is much closer to the modern secularized west or the pagan societies throughout history. Atheists literally believe man evolved from an ape, what are you talking about?
I'm not sure what timeline you come from, but that's not what Christianity is about.
How about the Medival Dark Ages that spanned for a literal millennia? The Jews don't record that part of history especially at the early parts for a good reason.
What about them? First off, you're using a propaganda term by Voltaire and the enlightenment freemason illuminati revolutionaries who blamed Christianity and the Church for everything bad under the sun. Those are the guys that brought you the French commune and later communism. What little you know of the Middle ages comes from the biased narratives those guys promoted. I can't blame you though because your whole country was established on the revolutionary ethos. That's why there's no true conservatism in the US.
Secondly, why blame Christianity in particular? Did non-Christian cultures fare any better?
Thirdly, jews hate Christ and Christianity and were banned from many Christian empires like Byzantine. Your skewed view of "judeo-christianity" is based on demented protestant propaganda. I'm sorry the only (fake) Christianity you've been exposed to is protestant zionism and messianic judaism. This is a very recent development and has nothing to do with Christian tradition - it is completely astroturfed.
Modern day secular humanists and classical liberals/libertarians have much more in common with the commies (including common roots) than with Christians. They may differ on economical issues but they share a common materialistic worldview, a common view on the origin of man, of nature, of historical progress, moral and cultural relativism, etc.
PS: About 85% of party members under Lenin were jewish. The whole communist experiment was financed by City of London (((financial elite))) and encouraged by the western intellectuals and scientific elite, just like they did with the French revolution and other anti-monarchist revolutions in the 18-19c. Russia had many problems prior to the revolution, but what they went through after killing off their monarch and banning Christianity was unparalleled. They're still scarred by the atrocities of the atheist "scientific regime" they were under.
First, your argument amounts to "the Trump supporters claimed that the USA is ruled by a deep state, so every one who thinks the USA is ruled by a deep state supports Donald Trump". Then, there's plenty of evidence that the same group of people behind the Illuminati French Revolution and Communists are descendants of the ones that caused the Medieval Dark Ages. They just cannot use outright religion as an excuse because nobody will buy it unless they changed the wording and kept the entire script intact.
Sadly, Christianity in the West has been compromised for more than a thousand years. The Illuminati took much of their strategy, methods and structure from the Jesuits.
I'm not sure what you mean by "caused the Medieval Dark Ages". You speak of it as if it was some kind of an event or a single regime, yet the Medieval period spanned 1000 years and it's impossible to be summarized like that (besides calling it "dark" and "the old world order" as opposed to "enlightened" and "novus ordo seclorum" in freemason/illuminati fashion which is exactly what the 18c. revolutionaries did and what people are born into presupposing the good guys won a few hundred years ago against the oppressive monarchy and Church bringing us the enlightened egalitarian, feminized and degenerate society we live in today, a society that can't even reproduce and that ironically while seemingly chaotic is more oppressed and top-down controlled than ever by tptb).
I'm not sure what you mean by "caused the Medieval Dark Ages". You speak of it as if it was some kind of an event or a single regime, yet the Medieval period spanned 1000 years and it's impossible to be summarized like that (besides calling it "dark" and "the old world order" as opposed to "enlightened" and "novus ordo seclorum" in freemason/illuminati fashion which is exactly what the 18c. revolutionaries did and what people are born into presupposing the good guys won a few hundred years ago against the oppressive monarchy and Church bringing us the enlightened egalitarian, feminized and degenerate society we live in today, a society that can't even reproduce and that ironically while seemingly chaotic is more oppressed and top-down controlled than ever by tptb).
Ah, so you still don't get it.
They're just repeating the age of serfdom and rat plagues and only used other excuses to carry it out. You might think they have no religion, but they have a religion. It's literally the same type/group of people behind it and the outcome is literally the same.
Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.
You're looking at history through a liberal egalitarian and frankly marxist worldview where there is always a struggle between the oppressor and the oppressed class. The have and the have nots. That's a relatively recent notion and definitely was not how people in the Medieval time thought. Everyone had their duties and responsibilities in society according to their lot. The king had a duty to rule for the good of the people and people had a duty to obey their king. Just like your head commands your whole body - should the body revolt and disobey it because the other parts feel as important as the head? That's the same thought process that brought us all forms of egalitarianism including feminism too. Women were told they no longer had to listen to and obey men because they are now equal and can be their own masters. Now they assumed the oppressed class status. Next it was the blacks. Then the gays, etc. They've opened the pandora box. Now everyone thinks they're entitled to rights but reject their duties. Everyone talks about liberty as the ultimate good and yet they are more slavish than ever.
Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.
This is when you have an organic society. European "history" past the Roman Empire is on a straight and slippery slope to controlled mass-demoliton by insidious forces (most people like to call them the "Jews" but Gentiles such as the Chinese and the Cambodians can join) and it gets spread to just about everywhere else after the 19th century.
says the extremely stupid ape tranny... have fun with the mark.
Communists did emulate Christian ideas but of course inverted it all, that part is true. The rest is bs.
I'm not sure what timeline you come from, but that's not what Christianity is about. This is much closer to the modern secularized west or the pagan societies throughout history. Atheists literally believe man evolved from an ape, what are you talking about?
How about the Medival Dark Ages that spanned for a literal millennia? The Jews don't record that part of history especially at the early parts for a good reason.
What about them? First off, you're using a propaganda term by Voltaire and the enlightenment freemason illuminati revolutionaries who blamed Christianity and the Church for everything bad under the sun. Those are the guys that brought you the French commune and later communism. What little you know of the Middle ages comes from the biased narratives those guys promoted. I can't blame you though because your whole country was established on the revolutionary ethos. That's why there's no true conservatism in the US.
Secondly, why blame Christianity in particular? Did non-Christian cultures fare any better?
Thirdly, jews hate Christ and Christianity and were banned from many Christian empires like Byzantine. Your skewed view of "judeo-christianity" is based on demented protestant propaganda. I'm sorry the only (fake) Christianity you've been exposed to is protestant zionism and messianic judaism. This is a very recent development and has nothing to do with Christian tradition - it is completely astroturfed.
Modern day secular humanists and classical liberals/libertarians have much more in common with the commies (including common roots) than with Christians. They may differ on economical issues but they share a common materialistic worldview, a common view on the origin of man, of nature, of historical progress, moral and cultural relativism, etc.
PS: About 85% of party members under Lenin were jewish. The whole communist experiment was financed by City of London (((financial elite))) and encouraged by the western intellectuals and scientific elite, just like they did with the French revolution and other anti-monarchist revolutions in the 18-19c. Russia had many problems prior to the revolution, but what they went through after killing off their monarch and banning Christianity was unparalleled. They're still scarred by the atrocities of the atheist "scientific regime" they were under.
First, your argument amounts to "the Trump supporters claimed that the USA is ruled by a deep state, so every one who thinks the USA is ruled by a deep state supports Donald Trump". Then, there's plenty of evidence that the same group of people behind the Illuminati French Revolution and Communists are descendants of the ones that caused the Medieval Dark Ages. They just cannot use outright religion as an excuse because nobody will buy it unless they changed the wording and kept the entire script intact.
Sadly, Christianity in the West has been compromised for more than a thousand years. The Illuminati took much of their strategy, methods and structure from the Jesuits.
I'm not sure what you mean by "caused the Medieval Dark Ages". You speak of it as if it was some kind of an event or a single regime, yet the Medieval period spanned 1000 years and it's impossible to be summarized like that (besides calling it "dark" and "the old world order" as opposed to "enlightened" and "novus ordo seclorum" in freemason/illuminati fashion which is exactly what the 18c. revolutionaries did and what people are born into presupposing the good guys won a few hundred years ago against the oppressive monarchy and Church bringing us the enlightened egalitarian, feminized and degenerate society we live in today, a society that can't even reproduce and that ironically while seemingly chaotic is more oppressed and top-down controlled than ever by tptb).
Ah, so you still don't get it.
They're just repeating the age of serfdom and rat plagues and only used other excuses to carry it out. You might think they have no religion, but they have a religion. It's literally the same type/group of people behind it and the outcome is literally the same.
Famine, serfdom, genocides and rat plagues.
Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.
You're looking at history through a liberal egalitarian and frankly marxist worldview where there is always a struggle between the oppressor and the oppressed class. The have and the have nots. That's a relatively recent notion and definitely was not how people in the Medieval time thought. Everyone had their duties and responsibilities in society according to their lot. The king had a duty to rule for the good of the people and people had a duty to obey their king. Just like your head commands your whole body - should the body revolt and disobey it because the other parts feel as important as the head? That's the same thought process that brought us all forms of egalitarianism including feminism too. Women were told they no longer had to listen to and obey men because they are now equal and can be their own masters. Now they assumed the oppressed class status. Next it was the blacks. Then the gays, etc. They've opened the pandora box. Now everyone thinks they're entitled to rights but reject their duties. Everyone talks about liberty as the ultimate good and yet they are more slavish than ever.
This is when you have an organic society. European "history" past the Roman Empire is on a straight and slippery slope to controlled mass-demoliton by insidious forces (most people like to call them the "Jews" but Gentiles such as the Chinese and the Cambodians can join) and it gets spread to just about everywhere else after the 19th century.