BREAKING – EXPOSING THE CIA:
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Don't you see the hypocrisy of your argument? You are saying to trust this person you've never met in an attempt to discredit another person you've never met. It also doesn't make sense in this digital age your brother Justin didn't have copies of his evidence. When was the evidence collected? 1996?
You're one of the worst sophists I've argued with here. It's like I'm talking to a wall. I don't trust one over the other, I didn't know about this Justin guy prior to his documentary. He makes a good case against James, that's all. But since you don't care I can't force feed you the evidence he's got. Believe whatever you want, I'm done arguing.
It's clear you cannot differentiate between a fallacious argument and a legitimate critique of your logic or lack thereof. Your entire argument for disparaging James O'Keefe hinges on a "documentary" made by someone who worked for him Do you not understand what a conflict of interest is? It's not an "argument" you've referenced one likely highly biased documentary by a former employee of James O'Keefe. And I noticed you didn't even attempt to justify how a professional wouldn't have a copy of their own evidence against Pfizer. I think he brought that to James O'Keefe in an attempt to trap him in arbitration with big pharma. What other possible explanation could justify willingly handing James O'Keefe the only proof he had? There's one other distinct possibility, he's a disingenuous piece of shit much akin to your style of "argument". Are you Justin?🤔