BREAKING – EXPOSING THE CIA:
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Where is this purported evidence or is it as it appears only your opinion?
He's a journalist who does primarily undercover exposé type reporting.
Big pharma has entire law firms on retainer waiting to nail journalists or whistle-blowers to the fucking wall. It pays to cover your six.
If you weren't acting like a filthy communist attempting to disparage someone who has actually exposed corruption I wouldn't have used his quote.
This shows your logic is unsound, let's not trust the guy exposing the CIA or big pharma but let's trust the opinion of this random rumble video. Who are you carrying water for boy?
The evidence is in the video I sent you but since it's a long documentary here's just the part where James talks to Justin and tells him he's been to the Bohemian Grove. And no, he was not investigating, he was mingling with the cabal he's supposed to expose. At least make an effort to research the things you're arguing against: https://twitter.com/alyssamariiee7/status/1765811014032142527
It's not a random rumble guy - he worked for Pfizer and PV, he has a recording of James admitting to being at the Grove and pictures of James' personal card from the event. I'm sorry for tearing down your hero, I liked PV too until I saw the evidence. James has been silent through all of this. Anyway I've given you the evidence, so you can cope and make excuses without even acknowledging it or face the truth and ask the reasonable question wtf was James doing there and why did he suppress the biggest Pfizer story and withheld the files?
To answer your last question - I'm carrying water for the truth and I will expose any shill that I can for that purpose.
Sounds like you have abandonment issues that have snowballed into extreme bias. Does your opinion of James O'Keefe change the fact he got CIA employees on tape admitting to a crime?
I didn't realize we had a Jordan Peterson here. Well, thank you for the free psychological appraisal, doc. Now if you're done with deflecting with ad homs, would you like to address the argument?
No, but if it really were a crime and something worth our time, wouldn't it have any consequences? Like public outcry, protests and prosecution? This goon here said nothing that wasn't already known, maybe it could have been a scandal 50 years ago when boomers thought the feds were serving and protecting the country from the "dirty commies" but in current clown world climate that's hardly an outrage.
In your opinion.