Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

13
Stanley Meyer invented a fuel cell that could make cars run on water, then he was murdered (www.bitchute.com)
posted 1 year ago by SystemGay 1 year ago by SystemGay +13 / -1
5 comments share
5 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (5)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– vpnsurfer 1 point 1 year ago +3 / -2

It is impossible to get more energy out of Hydrogen that you get from splitting water than what you put into the process of splitting the water.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

impossible to get more energy out of

a) What if energy implies foundation (whole) for inherent potential (partials)?

b) What if wanting to "get out" prevents one from discerning self to be within need?

c) MORE than all perceivable offered to each ones perception?

hydrogen

What if HYDRO (temporal) GEN (ongoing)? Trying to split temporal further sure makes getting more seem impossible, but what if ongoing can't be depleted by anything temporal within?

What generates (gen) water (hydro)? Why is gas called "aeriform fluid"? What if caloric (matter of heat) can only be temporal?

what you put into the process

Which process precedes inception? Into what is life born?

splitting the water

a) Water finding level implies partial balancing within whole...why split a partial further?

b) Why are few suggesting...AT'OM, noun (Latin atomus; from not, and to cut) - "a particle of matter so minute as to admit of no division"?

Doesn't particle imply a division within whole?

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy