It is the fear of suggesting it that frustrates me. We are afraid to have real plain transparent conversations bcz the "government is watching us" conditioning. Scored is a honey pot.. you are already caught. :)
Hey watchers --> you shd all be drowned and all politicians shd be assassinated and the Potomac shd run red and every building shd burn and every supporter and puppet torn apart and corporate leaders ripped from their bunkers and filled with carbon dioxide and their children locked in a prison of rapists, then the prison burned with all inside, and the power shd be cut and servers from server farms be used to smash the skulls of every journalist and tech tycoon.
Solution (inception towards death) directs matter (life)...others suggest one to respond (re) by turning (volu) against one another, when ignoring direction.
Few suggest progressivism to tempt many towards outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin, hence turning their responses from one side to the other aka inverting the status quo of being resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
Ask yourself if you are being tricked to view solution as an outcome instead of origin...use implication (if/then) instead of reason (versus) to be able to answer yourself.
Ayh wish ayh could join you in not wanting to communicate and just avoid the internet -- bcz we all know it now primarily exists as a honey pot against us and to program us -- but ayh weigh the notion that if a few small notes slip thru that can guide people in to a singular minded goal when the shit hits the fan -- then it will be worth sacrificing self -- then sacrificing all our luxuries.
But ayh certainly can not keep this up much longer and neither can the people ayh know who have nothing left to lose. Timing is every thing --> but there is no obvious window bcz most of the people you want to believe would fight for peasant freedom, right wingers, as so distracted by bread and circus... this is a bad place to be and they know this. It is why there is no question why they will reinstall Trump.
Every one has to lose for us to win. Try and find the right time to begin a war with that horrible logic. ~(o.o)~
The nature of sharing information is to inspire response
a) Nature shares inspiration...not information. Being alive implies as partial (share) within (in) breath (spirit) of action (tion). Breathing implies respiration within animation.
b) INSPIRation INSPIRes...information forms conflicts within. These conflicts are called "reason".
c) Responding to information tempts one to hold onto; responding to inspiration inspires one to resist temptations by letting go.
I remain apoplectic at the way these evil people have sullied the gift God gave us all. But wise enough to know patience, don't let them control you by their actions. Choose the battlefield carefully, take away the advantages their wealth affords them.
The paradox is that the first violence has to be committed against our selves to even begin to fight.
The time to fight comes when their protections are lost and we lose touch with each other. Which is why ayh can not believe they would purposely shut down the net without strict measures in place.
Their protections are lost when the Fed is destroyed. The Fed controls worldwide currency policy that enables senseless wars. What destroys the Fed? When/how do the people coordinate on no longer paying taxes?
The “first violence” has happened to the people repeatedly in recent decades and still the people do not revolt. If Ruby Ridge, Waco, and 9/11 (US examples) did not generate violent responses, what will? I had hope that covid would tip the scales, it didn’t. Why? Because people are not spiritual, you must be spiritual to participate in a spiritual war.
The courts are corrupt, so you cannot be arrested or you’re dead. The Branch Davidian response was correct. If the pussies in TX had joined in Waco’s defense, the US would be different country today.
The internet is being used to coordinate resistance worldwide and to wake up some normies, so I view it as a tool given to us by God. The level of information sharing that the internet allows makes this clear to me. If/when the internet is taken down, we will be approaching end times.
Fed being destroyed would be meaningless to them. The Fed did not exist 100 years ago when European and American oligarchs were running wars, banks, oil, resources, etc etc etc etc. The Fed is just a mask for doing what they were already doing but making it seem credibly legally. Take down the Fed and nothing changes.
When ayh mean first violence -- ayh mean self inflicted. The one thing we are so fixated on is our technological age -- and each generation becomes more embedded. Hell, ayh love technology.. and hate it. But if we are going to have any advantage -- we have to all agree what x y and z will be and then shut down the entire digital infrastructure -- and perpetually destroy it for months in to years.
The results will disengage people from the propaganda.
Those who were reliant, who are burdens on humanity, will % die off and the other percent will pill up fast as crime and desperation set in.
The people who will thrive are most people on our side (save for the fat ones, which they can die off too)
It is a simple fragile weapon that when it is toppled, communities will come together, knowledge will be shared, enemies will scramble, stumble and fall, populations will be thinned.. nature will have a chance to correct some wrongs.
One quick point is that the Fed has existed since Jesus threw the tax collectors out of the temple (and before), it was just not named the Fed. It’s the same usury tactics and ((bankers)) behind it all. I think we are in agreement overall.
Taxation has existed long before Judaism, Christianity, ..it goes back as far as documentation has allowed us to peer. Taxation has to exist for any government system, democratic to monarchy, to exist. The luxury of taxation is having to be less directly concerned about infrastructure and more about personal maintenance. THAT SAID.. the issue has always been strictly about who controls it -- or more precisely who the peasants allow to control it. So again, remove the mechanisms, it does not change the organic restoration of it thanks to demand. You have to remove the people.. and the function of the people.
Inherently violence in response to treason is optimistic. Your perspective of just two weeking and staying positive while doing nothing but hope IS what they prefer and is self appointed doom.
I think there are a few realists here. Revolution is the only solution.
It is the fear of suggesting it that frustrates me. We are afraid to have real plain transparent conversations bcz the "government is watching us" conditioning. Scored is a honey pot.. you are already caught. :)
Hey watchers --> you shd all be drowned and all politicians shd be assassinated and the Potomac shd run red and every building shd burn and every supporter and puppet torn apart and corporate leaders ripped from their bunkers and filled with carbon dioxide and their children locked in a prison of rapists, then the prison burned with all inside, and the power shd be cut and servers from server farms be used to smash the skulls of every journalist and tech tycoon.
For starters...
Somehow, if you are a realist, people call you a "negative nancy" and a "doomer".
Have fun.
Solution (inception towards death) directs matter (life)...others suggest one to respond (re) by turning (volu) against one another, when ignoring direction.
Few suggest progressivism to tempt many towards outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin, hence turning their responses from one side to the other aka inverting the status quo of being resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
Ask yourself if you are being tricked to view solution as an outcome instead of origin...use implication (if/then) instead of reason (versus) to be able to answer yourself.
I reached the point where I will not communicate openly on the internet any longer (it's a weapon pointed at us). I'm with you.
Ayh wish ayh could join you in not wanting to communicate and just avoid the internet -- bcz we all know it now primarily exists as a honey pot against us and to program us -- but ayh weigh the notion that if a few small notes slip thru that can guide people in to a singular minded goal when the shit hits the fan -- then it will be worth sacrificing self -- then sacrificing all our luxuries.
But ayh certainly can not keep this up much longer and neither can the people ayh know who have nothing left to lose. Timing is every thing --> but there is no obvious window bcz most of the people you want to believe would fight for peasant freedom, right wingers, as so distracted by bread and circus... this is a bad place to be and they know this. It is why there is no question why they will reinstall Trump.
Every one has to lose for us to win. Try and find the right time to begin a war with that horrible logic. ~(o.o)~
a) Nature shares inspiration...not information. Being alive implies as partial (share) within (in) breath (spirit) of action (tion). Breathing implies respiration within animation.
b) INSPIRation INSPIRes...information forms conflicts within. These conflicts are called "reason".
c) Responding to information tempts one to hold onto; responding to inspiration inspires one to resist temptations by letting go.
Isn't that the big Q? When? When does violence become necessary? I fear it's now. Or happy.
Its always now, is the problem. Some nows are better than others but when we are at such a disadvantage, its hard to know.
My gut tells me to be traditionally rational about it and play the weather in our favor.
I remain apoplectic at the way these evil people have sullied the gift God gave us all. But wise enough to know patience, don't let them control you by their actions. Choose the battlefield carefully, take away the advantages their wealth affords them.
They have one weapon --> communication.
We have one weapon --> communication.
The paradox is that the first violence has to be committed against our selves to even begin to fight.
The time to fight comes when their protections are lost and we lose touch with each other. Which is why ayh can not believe they would purposely shut down the net without strict measures in place.
Some thoughts/opinions…
Their protections are lost when the Fed is destroyed. The Fed controls worldwide currency policy that enables senseless wars. What destroys the Fed? When/how do the people coordinate on no longer paying taxes?
The “first violence” has happened to the people repeatedly in recent decades and still the people do not revolt. If Ruby Ridge, Waco, and 9/11 (US examples) did not generate violent responses, what will? I had hope that covid would tip the scales, it didn’t. Why? Because people are not spiritual, you must be spiritual to participate in a spiritual war.
The courts are corrupt, so you cannot be arrested or you’re dead. The Branch Davidian response was correct. If the pussies in TX had joined in Waco’s defense, the US would be different country today.
The internet is being used to coordinate resistance worldwide and to wake up some normies, so I view it as a tool given to us by God. The level of information sharing that the internet allows makes this clear to me. If/when the internet is taken down, we will be approaching end times.
Fed being destroyed would be meaningless to them. The Fed did not exist 100 years ago when European and American oligarchs were running wars, banks, oil, resources, etc etc etc etc. The Fed is just a mask for doing what they were already doing but making it seem credibly legally. Take down the Fed and nothing changes.
When ayh mean first violence -- ayh mean self inflicted. The one thing we are so fixated on is our technological age -- and each generation becomes more embedded. Hell, ayh love technology.. and hate it. But if we are going to have any advantage -- we have to all agree what x y and z will be and then shut down the entire digital infrastructure -- and perpetually destroy it for months in to years.
The results will disengage people from the propaganda.
Those who were reliant, who are burdens on humanity, will % die off and the other percent will pill up fast as crime and desperation set in.
The people who will thrive are most people on our side (save for the fat ones, which they can die off too)
It is a simple fragile weapon that when it is toppled, communities will come together, knowledge will be shared, enemies will scramble, stumble and fall, populations will be thinned.. nature will have a chance to correct some wrongs.
Then we can start over.
All it takes is a flip of the switch.
One quick point is that the Fed has existed since Jesus threw the tax collectors out of the temple (and before), it was just not named the Fed. It’s the same usury tactics and ((bankers)) behind it all. I think we are in agreement overall.
Taxation has existed long before Judaism, Christianity, ..it goes back as far as documentation has allowed us to peer. Taxation has to exist for any government system, democratic to monarchy, to exist. The luxury of taxation is having to be less directly concerned about infrastructure and more about personal maintenance. THAT SAID.. the issue has always been strictly about who controls it -- or more precisely who the peasants allow to control it. So again, remove the mechanisms, it does not change the organic restoration of it thanks to demand. You have to remove the people.. and the function of the people.
Fun that this comes right after a post where I suggested people to get a grip...and they all called me a "Jewish Doomer Shill".
How is wanting violence, "doomer"?
Inherently violence in response to treason is optimistic. Your perspective of just two weeking and staying positive while doing nothing but hope IS what they prefer and is self appointed doom.