Sunglasses Guy Explains The Jew
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (6)
sorted by:
Not human? Jews are all too human. They are the exemplification of man's pride, whether in their racism against everyone or how they boast about their successes endlessly. They are the quintessential worldly man.
Well said, I’ll refine his closing statement. Any actual so called good jew, would actually have to renounce all modern day judaisim’s, and become a Christian. It is impossible for them to hold onto any of the vile talmud and kkkabala teachings while actually being a good person.
I think there's a difference between a so called good jew and a lukewarm non-evil jew. I feel like most people are born into a religion but aren't actually knowledgeable about it and just casually partake in the rituals.
Any form of acceptance of modern day judaism is any capacity is an acceptance of evil into one’s life. The talmud’s teachings leads to murder, sexual perversion and thievery. Even if they loosely/lukewarmly partake in its practices, their underlying principles are built on a of a premise of evil teachings.
A simple comparison would be to look at Christianity, even the lukewarm participants understand the golden rule of “treat other people well,” which itself is built on the 10 commandments.. how far a person takes that teaching depends on the person, but in general they will not go out muring other people… their bigger outer actions will be guided by that simple principle.
Good versus evil implies different sides within same conflict. Looking for differences within same conflict implies what?
a) Juda-ism and Christ-ism implies different labels for same foundation. Whatever label one chooses; one consents to the same suggested -ism.
b) Responding to a noun (re-nounce) implies one consent to a suggested name by another. Once again...different names/numbers for the same suggested NOUN - "combination of sounds by which a thing is called".
a) Each being is born with FREE will of choice before choosing to bind self anew (Latin religio; to bind anew) to the suggested "religions" by another.
b) "into" implies within (life) towards (inception towards death), hence being set free to live aka born to be alive.
a) Able implies action (inception towards death) enabling reactions (life).
b) Known implies perceivable; ledge implies "a prominent part; a regular part rising or projecting beyond the rest"...aka ones perception rising discernment of self...unless ignored for suggestions by another.
If partial within whole takes others partials, then there will be a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among partials aka a division of ones into a dual-ism aka a DUEL.
Now let's look at "ritual" aka RITE; as in ones rite (life) of passage (inception towards death) and DUAL...a duel against another within ones rite....a ritual/riteduel/ritedual.