Aka consenting (yes) to suggested, while denying (no) perceivable; which establishes a conjunction (and) in-between buyer (ones choice of consent) and seller (chosen ones suggestion).
exactly
EX (expression) ACT (action) implies ones expressed reaction (life) within all impressing action (inception towards death)...reasoning (yes vs no) tempts one to ignore that.
It's easier to talk about the Jews doing Jew things than mention the Devil and his legions.
Not all Jews are Hebrews...just sayin.
Going after implies following others...that's what goyim choose to do.
a) COST aka CO (together; with) STARE (to stand)...that's what goyim choose to do. Meanwhile... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
b) COST (phonetic caust) - "corrosive; burning", hence WHOLE/HOLO (inception towards death) + COST/CAUST (life).
Sleight of hand for the cost of money...Mr. BURNS.
c) If M-ONE-Y (my one); then why pay for what's already mine? Then again...that's what goyim choose to do.
a) Alchemical transmutation.
b) Ones choice consenting to chosen ones suggestion permits alchemical transmutation within oneself by another.
Yes and no. Exactly.
Aka consenting (yes) to suggested, while denying (no) perceivable; which establishes a conjunction (and) in-between buyer (ones choice of consent) and seller (chosen ones suggestion).
EX (expression) ACT (action) implies ones expressed reaction (life) within all impressing action (inception towards death)...reasoning (yes vs no) tempts one to ignore that.
Will