a) The first comment: "This speech makes me proud to be Scottish. And I'm from Bangladesh."...that's how jews meme gentiles.
b) MEME; noun - ""an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person, introduced by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins in "The Selfish Gene," coined by him from Greek sources, such as mimeisthai "to imitate".
Aka monkey see; monkey do. Imitating (similar/equal) others instead of being different.
That's just nonsense. People who talk shit about others are attempting to bring them down to their own perception of themselves, those who support others are pulling them up to their higher level. Evil cannot create or support it can only destroy or degrade
People who talk shit about others are attempting to bring them down
a) Only within fall (inception towards death) can there be rising (life).
b) Ones consent to suggested talk (articulation of sound) tempts one to hold onto definitions/meaning. Holding onto, while falling...drags one down faster.
c) Resisting the temptation to hold onto...grows resistance.
perception of themselves
Whole (perceivable) generates partials (perception) by setting itself apart...others suggest pluralism (them) to tempt together.
One cannot perceive them...only each other one. Them implies a suggest label upon the aggregation of many ones, and ones consent tempts one to hold onto that label.
In short...suggestion (them) distracts from perception (one).
support others
Support (inception towards death) generates supplements (life)...supplementing others; spends self, while ignoring support.
pulling others up
Natural order pushes (inception) and pulls (death) those living within simultaneously aka need to resist (push) within want to be tempted (pull).
higher level
Only within level (inception towards death) can there be variables (life) aka only within low (ongoing loss) can there be high (temporary growth).
Evil cannot create
Evil vs good implies reasoning over suggested. Not implies suggested nihilism tempting ones denial of perceivable. Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore being within everything perceivable.
cannot support...only destroy or degrade
That which destroys/degrades (inception towards death) implies ones only life support. Being implies living within process of dying. Trying to support each other destroys being, which is why healthcare by few destroys the health of many.
Helping each other tempts one to ignore being reactor (growth) within generator (loss)...only if one chooses to react, can one re-generate self.
a) FREE will of choice implies within DOM-inance of balance...only within balance can there be choice.
b) DOM (inception towards death) doesn't preserve FREE (life)...it offers temporary growth within ongoing loss, which implies adaptation of choice within balance.
c) Towards (to) implies motion...free (choice) dom (balance) implies matter within momentum of motion. Matter is offered a momentary choice to sustain self within momentum of motion.
Others suggest preserve aka PRAE (before) SERVARE (to keep safe) as the inversion of being (life) within harm (inception towards death).
speech
a) Speech (articulation of sound) implies as suggested by others, which tempts one to ignore perceivable "natural sound".
b) FREE (perception) within DOM (perceivable) can be deceived with liberty (suggestion).
LIB'ERTY, noun - "freedom from restraint"...only while restraint (balance) can one be free (choice).
c) Speech implies a liberty for many by suggested words from few, while using LETTERS aka ones consent to LET another ones suggestion shape words (artifice) out of sound (natural).
Letters btw go back to RU'NES/RHYMES - "consonance of sounds" aka ACCORD - "concert; harmony of sounds; the union of different sounds".
Why is that an issue? Because SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken" differentiates itself into each in sanus (within sound) per sonos (by sound) aka into each ones structured-mind-within (in-stru-ment)....suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore that.
It's dEmOcRaCy! If you don't like it go to Russia, chud!1!!
hmm I wonder if the ECHR will rule against them (Eu Court of Human Rights) which the UK has kept as the ultimate arbiter afert Brexit.
if the pension systems are wiped out and inflation is too high to afford anything who will enforce the "laws" of the land?
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...the only force (momentum of motion) that exist for the matter within.
In my time line we say "i may disagree with what you are saying, but i will fight to the death to make sure you are allowed to say it"
this time line just can't remember why free speech is important... so bizarre to me.
They may take our lives but they will never take our MEMES!
a) The first comment: "This speech makes me proud to be Scottish. And I'm from Bangladesh."...that's how jews meme gentiles.
b) MEME; noun - ""an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person, introduced by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins in "The Selfish Gene," coined by him from Greek sources, such as mimeisthai "to imitate".
Aka monkey see; monkey do. Imitating (similar/equal) others instead of being different.
Never become a celebrity if you read the comments
Those who celebrate (praise; raise) others are willingly lowering themselves...why would those being raised look down upon those raising them?
The trick...it ain't a pedestal being raised for few; it's the many digging a pit for themselves.
That's just nonsense. People who talk shit about others are attempting to bring them down to their own perception of themselves, those who support others are pulling them up to their higher level. Evil cannot create or support it can only destroy or degrade
Can nothing (non) be sensed?
a) Only within fall (inception towards death) can there be rising (life).
b) Ones consent to suggested talk (articulation of sound) tempts one to hold onto definitions/meaning. Holding onto, while falling...drags one down faster.
c) Resisting the temptation to hold onto...grows resistance.
Whole (perceivable) generates partials (perception) by setting itself apart...others suggest pluralism (them) to tempt together.
One cannot perceive them...only each other one. Them implies a suggest label upon the aggregation of many ones, and ones consent tempts one to hold onto that label.
In short...suggestion (them) distracts from perception (one).
Support (inception towards death) generates supplements (life)...supplementing others; spends self, while ignoring support.
Natural order pushes (inception) and pulls (death) those living within simultaneously aka need to resist (push) within want to be tempted (pull).
Only within level (inception towards death) can there be variables (life) aka only within low (ongoing loss) can there be high (temporary growth).
Evil vs good implies reasoning over suggested. Not implies suggested nihilism tempting ones denial of perceivable. Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore being within everything perceivable.
That which destroys/degrades (inception towards death) implies ones only life support. Being implies living within process of dying. Trying to support each other destroys being, which is why healthcare by few destroys the health of many.
Helping each other tempts one to ignore being reactor (growth) within generator (loss)...only if one chooses to react, can one re-generate self.
Rest assured the rest of the Anglophone (former) nations are spinning up similar tyranny.
a) FREE will of choice implies within DOM-inance of balance...only within balance can there be choice.
b) DOM (inception towards death) doesn't preserve FREE (life)...it offers temporary growth within ongoing loss, which implies adaptation of choice within balance.
c) Towards (to) implies motion...free (choice) dom (balance) implies matter within momentum of motion. Matter is offered a momentary choice to sustain self within momentum of motion.
Others suggest preserve aka PRAE (before) SERVARE (to keep safe) as the inversion of being (life) within harm (inception towards death).
a) Speech (articulation of sound) implies as suggested by others, which tempts one to ignore perceivable "natural sound".
b) FREE (perception) within DOM (perceivable) can be deceived with liberty (suggestion).
LIB'ERTY, noun - "freedom from restraint"...only while restraint (balance) can one be free (choice).
c) Speech implies a liberty for many by suggested words from few, while using LETTERS aka ones consent to LET another ones suggestion shape words (artifice) out of sound (natural).
Letters btw go back to RU'NES/RHYMES - "consonance of sounds" aka ACCORD - "concert; harmony of sounds; the union of different sounds".
Why is that an issue? Because SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken" differentiates itself into each in sanus (within sound) per sonos (by sound) aka into each ones structured-mind-within (in-stru-ment)....suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore that.