The (((people))) at the top (the one in the money printing business) are neither communists nor capitalists. They are transnationalist technocrats and will tailor any system to serve their demonic NWO agenda. Communist countries will employ corporativism and degenerate consoomerist "free market" ideas and vice versa - capitalist liberal democracies will employ more socialist ideology and centralized government. They want a synthesis of both (that's what the Cold war was about). In the end they will either merge under a One world government or be separate and kept in an endless war Oceania/Eurasia/Eastasia 1984 scenario - whichever is more useful.
Yahweh is what the jews used to describe the second person of the Trinity (The Son, later incarnated as Jesus Christ OT "I am that I am" -> NT "Before Abraham was, I am"). As an Orthodox Christian, I believe the Western Church (Roman Catholicism) fell and became heretical mostly due to the centralization of power in the figure of the Pope and their deviation from the Early Church dogma and doctrines.
How is communism the "exactly same thing" as Medieval Vatican or 1984? There are similarities in the cult of the leader and centralization of power but that could be said about every monarchy, totalitarian government or corporation also.
How is communism the "exactly same thing" as Medieval Vatican or 1984? There are similarities in the cult of the leader and centralization of power but that could be said about every monarchy, totalitarian government or corporation also.
You see they're literally ran by the same group of people with the exact same premise. 1984 not withstanding since it's a fictional group. But it's all just the same old reskinned thing.
Only the elites get to eat and the rest starve to death and I meant literally
People can and will cancel and kill you if you stand on the wrong side of history
Perhaps deliberately, the entire society is based on superstitions over common sense and revolves around a supreme deity (communists are not atheists, they have a deity and it is the leader), which causes billions upon billions of deaths because people are forced to follow it or die
The ideology is previously considered unacceptable and is being normalized or is normalized
As an Orthodox Christian, I believe the Western Church (Roman Catholicism) fell and became heretical mostly due to the centralization of power in the figure of the Pope and their deviation from the Early Church dogma and doctrines.
No the Jews literally took over the Roman empire and went around inverting European civilization until it becomes one with Jewish civilization. It is not a bias, it is literally in the history book. Also there's no such thing as "heretical" when the Gnostics and the independent Evangelists are pretty much the "good guys" and are considered heretics by big religion.
Perhaps deliberately, the entire society is based on superstitions over common sense and revolves around a supreme deity (communists are not atheists, they have a deity and it is the leader), which causes billions upon billions of deaths because people are forced to follow it or die
And atheists don't hold superstitions and unjustified beliefs based on faith? Liberal humanists, naturalists and empiricists don't presuppose things they can't prove via the scientific method? David Hume deboonked those myths 250 years ago with the problem of induction. Then Willard Quine finished the positivists with his Two dogmas of empiricism. It's all faith and dogma based regardless of it being an organized religion or scientism (the cult of science and nature). There are no such things as brute facts or self-evident/common sense or pragmatic truths. Everything in existence and everything one appeals to should be accounted for and justified under their worldview (with the preconditions for it's existence being met for it to be possible).
We witnessed people dying en masse for believing or being forced to follow the coof Science. How do you people still continue with the same demented arguments against "muh religion" as if the enlightenment scientism based worldview isn't full of shit and doesn't lead to death, degeneracy and enslavement. You hate the Truth, which is God, this is how. You won't repent and submit but there is always hope as long as one is breathing.
No the Jews literally took over the Roman empire and went around inverting European civilization until it becomes one with Jewish civilization. It is not a bias, it is literally in the history book. Also there's no such thing as "heretical" when the Gnostics and the independent Evangelists are pretty much the "good guys" and are considered heretics by big religion.
There's no bias in the gnostic history books you read at all, I'm sure. What makes the gnostics the good guys?
We witnessed people dying en masse for believing or being forced to follow the coof Science. How do you people still continue with the same demented arguments against "muh religion" as if the enlightenment scientism based worldview isn't full of shit and doesn't lead to death, degeneracy and enslavement. You hate the Truth, which is God, this is how. You won't repent and submit but there is always hope as long as one is breathing.
Covidian "science" is religion.
There's no bias in the gnostic history books you read at all, I'm sure. What makes the gnostics the good guys?
I don't think you saw the " " around the "good guys" part. Also odd that you didn't rebuke the evangelists.
Needless to say the point is be it Vatican or Stalin, twisting the Jewish doctrine of religion makes them consider you a legitimate threat so you just die there.
Can you give me an example of a comprehensive atheist worldview or ideological system shared in an atheistic society that you wouldn't consider religion? Aren't liberal democracy, libertarianism, progressivism, industrialism or the postulates of "free market" capitalism a religion too? They have their dogma, their saints, their feasts, their sacraments. It sounds to me you use a very wide brush describing what religion constitutes. Communism and similar "scientific forms of government" (yes, it was called that) may employ certain aspects of Christianity and Judaism and treat the leader as a prophet/messiah/demigod, but they are still based on materialism and on things of this world - the metaphysical aspect of christology, salvation, eschatology, theosis is completely absent there. It's a very low effort imitation and inversion of what Christians believe.
I rebuke everyone who professes a form of Christianity outside the Church's doctrines and who perverts the faith (including evangelists and the Vatican). Have you noticed both communists and jews hate Christians? Not so much any other religion - they don't tolerate Christ in particular. Maybe it has something to do with the fact communism is a jewish psy op to begin with (85% of the communist party under Lenin was jewish).
Not so much any other religion - they don't tolerate Christ in particular. Maybe it has something to do with the fact communism is a jewish psy op to begin with (85% of the communist party under Lenin was jewish).
If you mean the type practiced by Americans then sure but I'm sure their religion is all around contempt for humanity in general, if they run out of people to kill they just kill their own. Also the Khmer Rouge and the Maoist CCP killed Bhuddists with Christians. The Khmer Rouge caused the mass exctinction of Muslims in Cambodia. The Vatican started by killing every single pagan and gnostic in Europe. It's just there are no Bhuddhists for Stalin to kill in Russia 1917.
Except communists already conquered the US in the 1960s. War only exists to kill white people.
False dialectic alert.
The (((people))) at the top (the one in the money printing business) are neither communists nor capitalists. They are transnationalist technocrats and will tailor any system to serve their demonic NWO agenda. Communist countries will employ corporativism and degenerate consoomerist "free market" ideas and vice versa - capitalist liberal democracies will employ more socialist ideology and centralized government. They want a synthesis of both (that's what the Cold war was about). In the end they will either merge under a One world government or be separate and kept in an endless war Oceania/Eurasia/Eastasia 1984 scenario - whichever is more useful.
Everything else is just a smokescreen.
You know that Communism is the exact same thing as the Medival Vatican or the 1984 scenario I mentioned right?
Replace the Yahweh with Stalin and it's still the same.
The rest I agree.
Yahweh is what the jews used to describe the second person of the Trinity (The Son, later incarnated as Jesus Christ OT "I am that I am" -> NT "Before Abraham was, I am"). As an Orthodox Christian, I believe the Western Church (Roman Catholicism) fell and became heretical mostly due to the centralization of power in the figure of the Pope and their deviation from the Early Church dogma and doctrines.
How is communism the "exactly same thing" as Medieval Vatican or 1984? There are similarities in the cult of the leader and centralization of power but that could be said about every monarchy, totalitarian government or corporation also.
You see they're literally ran by the same group of people with the exact same premise. 1984 not withstanding since it's a fictional group. But it's all just the same old reskinned thing.
No the Jews literally took over the Roman empire and went around inverting European civilization until it becomes one with Jewish civilization. It is not a bias, it is literally in the history book. Also there's no such thing as "heretical" when the Gnostics and the independent Evangelists are pretty much the "good guys" and are considered heretics by big religion.
And atheists don't hold superstitions and unjustified beliefs based on faith? Liberal humanists, naturalists and empiricists don't presuppose things they can't prove via the scientific method? David Hume deboonked those myths 250 years ago with the problem of induction. Then Willard Quine finished the positivists with his Two dogmas of empiricism. It's all faith and dogma based regardless of it being an organized religion or scientism (the cult of science and nature). There are no such things as brute facts or self-evident/common sense or pragmatic truths. Everything in existence and everything one appeals to should be accounted for and justified under their worldview (with the preconditions for it's existence being met for it to be possible).
We witnessed people dying en masse for believing or being forced to follow the coof Science. How do you people still continue with the same demented arguments against "muh religion" as if the enlightenment scientism based worldview isn't full of shit and doesn't lead to death, degeneracy and enslavement. You hate the Truth, which is God, this is how. You won't repent and submit but there is always hope as long as one is breathing.
There's no bias in the gnostic history books you read at all, I'm sure. What makes the gnostics the good guys?
Covidian "science" is religion.
I don't think you saw the " " around the "good guys" part. Also odd that you didn't rebuke the evangelists.
Needless to say the point is be it Vatican or Stalin, twisting the Jewish doctrine of religion makes them consider you a legitimate threat so you just die there.
Can you give me an example of a comprehensive atheist worldview or ideological system shared in an atheistic society that you wouldn't consider religion? Aren't liberal democracy, libertarianism, progressivism, industrialism or the postulates of "free market" capitalism a religion too? They have their dogma, their saints, their feasts, their sacraments. It sounds to me you use a very wide brush describing what religion constitutes. Communism and similar "scientific forms of government" (yes, it was called that) may employ certain aspects of Christianity and Judaism and treat the leader as a prophet/messiah/demigod, but they are still based on materialism and on things of this world - the metaphysical aspect of christology, salvation, eschatology, theosis is completely absent there. It's a very low effort imitation and inversion of what Christians believe.
I rebuke everyone who professes a form of Christianity outside the Church's doctrines and who perverts the faith (including evangelists and the Vatican). Have you noticed both communists and jews hate Christians? Not so much any other religion - they don't tolerate Christ in particular. Maybe it has something to do with the fact communism is a jewish psy op to begin with (85% of the communist party under Lenin was jewish).
If you mean the type practiced by Americans then sure but I'm sure their religion is all around contempt for humanity in general, if they run out of people to kill they just kill their own. Also the Khmer Rouge and the Maoist CCP killed Bhuddists with Christians. The Khmer Rouge caused the mass exctinction of Muslims in Cambodia. The Vatican started by killing every single pagan and gnostic in Europe. It's just there are no Bhuddhists for Stalin to kill in Russia 1917.
Most of the US already hates the fact that almost everything is made in China?