Again and again I observe exactly same stupidity of wistleblowers.
"Soon, I'll reveal information very harmful for NNN" - something happens - "They killed wistleblower!!!!1111"
It is unbeliveable insanity.
Today, there is no any problem to instantly share important information you have with whole world.
I could not imagine any real reason for wistleblower to keep information from release except may be some desire to get some ransom from corporation or whatever.
Wistleblower is a target only if he withhold some information. If information is already published, there is no any sense anymore to kill a wistleblower, his death will be only additional proof that information he released is truthful.
So if a wistleblower doesn't publish full information he have, without any omission, regardless of all that crap about "protecting persons from whatever", with exact names, facts, locations, dates, unredacted documents and so on, then there is something else , filthy and disguisting.
Same applicable to all that "great inventors of great inventions" and other similar persons.
When you suspend or withhold some information you know, this information is a mortal danger for you.
PS: When Twitter Files was published with redacted email From/To fields without IP addresses from mail path, it became absolutely clear that Musk is nowere near about getting rid of government and elites control over Twitter. Following events show that absolutely clear. But the first proof of that was withholding information about malicious actors participated in Twitter censorship.
As positive example of correct wistleblowing I could point to Hunter Biden e-mails dump where nothing is redacted and all email information is published including mail headers. But still there should be doubts about fullness of that dump. May be some emails was deleted before publishing f.e.
For real. Same goes for all the coof whistleblowers. I think they are afraid of the imminent lawsuits which follow divulging sensitive company information. Remember they most likely signed non-disclosure contracts.
If you're anonymous they have no reason not to kill you as a punishment and a warning to future whistleblowers (same as mafia rules). It's a tough situation to be in and every wrong decision can cost you your life. It's always a David against Goliath scenario and I applaud their bravery and self-sacrifice (provided they are not a psy op).
If you're anonymous they have no reason not to kill you as a punishment and a warning to future whistleblowers (same as mafia rules).
If you are anonymous, how they would know that it was you?
Also, they will have much more important task of damage control, when punishment of somebody will be only a proof and additional attention to the information.
Mafia killed snitches, who informed police or agreed to
testify in court, not made some information public. Here you have same situation, really. BigBusiness, just like mafia, account such wistleblower hiding data from public as a snitch, who is ready to witness to police or testify in court or something like.
There is difference between "People should know that it is Big Boss who racketing our town, here is proofs" and "I will give police/judge proofs about who is racketeering our town". Especially in the case of corrupt law system, when there is zero probablility that BigBoss/BigBusiness will be really punished. In the best case BigBoss/BigBusiness will be fined, nothing more, but people around will not be warned about source of danger, because "private person protection" and all that stuff.
It's always a David against Goliath scenario and I applaud their bravery and self-sacrifice
I will applaud their bravery only if that bravery have real results, specifically in releasing meaningful information about participants. With exact names, locations, documents, bank accounts, sums and all that stuff. Released to public without any redactions, not to some fucking court or lawyers who will sweep this stuff under the carpet and that's all.
He was Epsteined
Epstein is still alive tho
Again and again I observe exactly same stupidity of wistleblowers.
"Soon, I'll reveal information very harmful for NNN" - something happens - "They killed wistleblower!!!!1111"
It is unbeliveable insanity.
Today, there is no any problem to instantly share important information you have with whole world.
I could not imagine any real reason for wistleblower to keep information from release except may be some desire to get some ransom from corporation or whatever.
Wistleblower is a target only if he withhold some information. If information is already published, there is no any sense anymore to kill a wistleblower, his death will be only additional proof that information he released is truthful.
So if a wistleblower doesn't publish full information he have, without any omission, regardless of all that crap about "protecting persons from whatever", with exact names, facts, locations, dates, unredacted documents and so on, then there is something else , filthy and disguisting.
Same applicable to all that "great inventors of great inventions" and other similar persons.
When you suspend or withhold some information you know, this information is a mortal danger for you.
PS: When Twitter Files was published with redacted email From/To fields without IP addresses from mail path, it became absolutely clear that Musk is nowere near about getting rid of government and elites control over Twitter. Following events show that absolutely clear. But the first proof of that was withholding information about malicious actors participated in Twitter censorship.
As positive example of correct wistleblowing I could point to Hunter Biden e-mails dump where nothing is redacted and all email information is published including mail headers. But still there should be doubts about fullness of that dump. May be some emails was deleted before publishing f.e.
For real. Same goes for all the coof whistleblowers. I think they are afraid of the imminent lawsuits which follow divulging sensitive company information. Remember they most likely signed non-disclosure contracts.
Nobody force you to share your critical and important information under your real name.
Or there is something about acquiring some piece of fame and glory for themselves? Then, we are doomed in the long run.
If you're anonymous they have no reason not to kill you as a punishment and a warning to future whistleblowers (same as mafia rules). It's a tough situation to be in and every wrong decision can cost you your life. It's always a David against Goliath scenario and I applaud their bravery and self-sacrifice (provided they are not a psy op).
If you are anonymous, how they would know that it was you? Also, they will have much more important task of damage control, when punishment of somebody will be only a proof and additional attention to the information.
Mafia killed snitches, who informed police or agreed to testify in court, not made some information public. Here you have same situation, really. BigBusiness, just like mafia, account such wistleblower hiding data from public as a snitch, who is ready to witness to police or testify in court or something like.
There is difference between "People should know that it is Big Boss who racketing our town, here is proofs" and "I will give police/judge proofs about who is racketeering our town". Especially in the case of corrupt law system, when there is zero probablility that BigBoss/BigBusiness will be really punished. In the best case BigBoss/BigBusiness will be fined, nothing more, but people around will not be warned about source of danger, because "private person protection" and all that stuff.
I will applaud their bravery only if that bravery have real results, specifically in releasing meaningful information about participants. With exact names, locations, documents, bank accounts, sums and all that stuff. Released to public without any redactions, not to some fucking court or lawyers who will sweep this stuff under the carpet and that's all.
They're fuckin around making a martyr of an American working man