Do you ever have comments worth a pinch of salt?

Not referencing op, but Im thinking not many do.

Here is the part I find interesting. Main article says a "truck", the article they are referencing says nothing about trucks and talks about seismic lines.

Whats up with that?

But what we can do is show that there are lots of signals like this, and show they have all the characteristics we’d expect from a truck and none of the characteristics we'd expect from a meteor.”

https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/2595.pdf

The vast majority of these are presumably tectonic, which is unsurprising given the position of Manus Island on the Pacific Ring of Fire; and their seismic signals are highly likely to overprint on each other – as an example, we show calculated arrival times for an Mb 5.0 earthquake in the Kuril Islands which occurred at 16:50 UTC (ISC Bulletin ID 603942758).

Conclusions: Accordingly, we conclude that the signal at AU.MANU is possibly infrasound arrival from bolide in question, but there is no clear evidence for it being so. It is likely contaminated by seismic arrivals from tectonic events nearby, modifying any underlying signal. Furthermore, the accuracy with which the first arrival can be picked has been significantly overstated. The reported signal at AU.COEN is entirely spurious, in our analysis.

Tell me thats not intentionally obfuscated.

The first article mentions Oumuamua, which I felt like mentioning. This is the same guy who is convinced that its the equivalent of a space buoy. Its the first object we ever seen that was at near zero local space velocity. Were all swinging around the galaxy, but the individual systems are still moving at different speeds and directions. We are in such a old part of space, that chances of something just hovering in between pockets like that is close to nill.

Then on top of that, it just accelerates back out to where it came from, weird for sure.

Im also curious why avi thinks the bolide was watermelon sized.