France Moves To Criminalize Criticism Of Pfizer
(www.infowars.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
I don’t know the case number but what I do know is that it’s why google will no longer inform people whose websites are delisted because of data protection takedowns. There was an article in the guardian about it recently.
The German serial killer removing his Wikipedia page is an even better example though.
The Swedish guy just got search engine results delisted but did not actually remove the newspaper articles whereas the German guy literally got the original source material removed.
Do you have the name of the guy? that should be possible to find too.
Here’s one of the Germans. As you can see it was data protection he used by claiming Wikipedia and journalists violated his privacy by having public articles on his crimes. The articles were taken down under data protection laws because even though they were true they violated his rights to control his data lol.
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/us/13wiki.html
The Pirate Bay is a copyright issue. That’s irrelevant to the discussion because copyright is only really on things you own. With that being said, copyright laws are sometimes used in America to remove bad reviews by filing abusive DMCA takedowns claiming that the review contains a protected trademark or copyrighted material and therefore is to be removed.
The thing is, you can challenge a dmca takedown notice by stating it’s fair use. By submitting a counter notification your review or whatever immediately gets reuploaded because you have indemnified the hosting service such as google or Facebook from a copyright suit and stated you yourself will take the full brunt if the person who filed the dmca notice sues.