France Moves To Criminalize Criticism Of Pfizer
(www.infowars.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
European countries have very strict laws called data protection laws which when they were introduced the citizens were told was simply to enable them to prevent companies basically storing lots of shit on them and to prevent professionals randomly discussing their clients in their academic work. They were also told that these laws would enable them to demand companies hand over information the company had on them which was in response to fired lawyers refusing to hand over their clients case files to the new lawyers in order to spite the client.
On the surface three data protection laws seem really good.
In reality, these laws were quickly twisted into what they now are where in many European countries any criticism of anyone or any company no matter how true it is is automatically illegal because it violates their right to control their data in the public sphere etc. A corrupt politician or businessman can literally force newspapers to delete their reporting on his conviction from a few years ago for molesting his children because it violates his data when potential clients or voters see it.
This is what you’re seeing with the French law banning criticism of vaccine companies. It’s simply an expansion of data protection in that these vaccine companies don’t want criticism of them and the European country is enforcing that into law because the company has the right under these awful tyrannical laws to control its public data in a way that outside Europe would be terrifying.
This is why you MUST USE A VPN if you are in Europe and forums like this have a duty to document corruption there so that people in Europe with a con can still see it even if reporting on said corrupting has been nerfed in Europe lol.
That would be defamation laws, nothing to do with GDPR or other data privacy laws, in fact these laws specifically don't apply to public figures.
Defamation laws were heavily criticized already before implementation as everyone knew they would be abused like this.
Nope. In European countries you can use data protection laws to shut down criticism of you even if it is true. You’re from Sweden- a Swedish criminal (almost certainly a jew or some kind of Muslim) recently sued google for data protection violations because it refused to remove details of his criminal record from its public database. When google then sent the takedown notice to the newspapers who’s articles were removed the criminal then sued google again and the Swedish court ruled that it violated his data protection to inform the newspapers of the takedown requests against them.
I'm not from Sweden, but I know their language, link to the case. I want to see the outcome. Sounds very much like a ((( defamation ))) case of some kind and not GDPR.
Spez: instead of down voting, just link to the case. Sweden keeps it all public in a searchable database here: https://lexbase.se/, just give me the case number and I'll find it.
I don’t know the case number but what I do know is that it’s why google will no longer inform people whose websites are delisted because of data protection takedowns. There was an article in the guardian about it recently.
The German serial killer removing his Wikipedia page is an even better example though.
The Swedish guy just got search engine results delisted but did not actually remove the newspaper articles whereas the German guy literally got the original source material removed.