Good. Letting Sweden into nato would be like letting Ireland or Somalia into NATO. in other words Sweden will be a pathetic weak link which enables Russia to more easily spread the Russian Peace into Europe and save Europeans from America and the jewropean union.
American troops are now more thinly spread out in order to assist another freeloading welfare state which views anything masculine as toxic.
Not sure why a “Ruskie Shill” would want Sweden to join NATO. This just increases the likelihood of a costly accident, etc.
But Sweden already did joint ops with NATO before. So not sure how much change this really represents.
Edit: To be super-clear, Sweden and Finland joining NATO is still super-stupid. That was probably Blinkin’s retarded idea or something. Gonna get us all killed…..
Not sure why a “Ruskie Shill” would want Sweden to join NATO.
It's not very complex, really.
There could be following logic:
Finland was created by Russian Empire from part of Sweden after Swedish-Russian war. Swedes account Finns as subhumans and Finns was happy to obtain their own state inside Russian Empire and become free from Swedes.
So, Finns and Swedes are long-time enemies. Something like Greece and Turkey, or Germany and France.
More enemies in one alliance, more tensions will appear inside that alliance. And for the most decisions NATO need unilateral vote of all members. So, adding Finland-Sweden enemy pair into already very unstable alliance NATO make things worse for itself.
And to clarify, no version of NATO is up to the task of fighting Russia at this time, and folks inside NATO have been squabbling like little cunts for decades. Because they are European cunts + American cunts. So adding Sweden and Finland to that won’t change things much, in that regard.
Nowhere did I say NATO is not a threat to Russia. They can certainly cause trouble, and could release any number of NBC threats.
My point is/was that in their current srste of strength, cannot win a land war against Russia. And when one adds Russian missile capability, the picture gets even worse for NATO.
Swedes and Fins get along fine. Sure, there is history there. In my experience these days it’s more like taking the piss out of your cousin. Not Jets vs. Sharks.
n my experience these days it’s more like taking the piss out of your cousin. Not Jets vs. Sharks.
Nordic temper and way of doing business. They will not make a show from that. They will not do some small and silly shit. But will do maximum shit to each other in most important moment. History of Sweden-Finland relations have multiple examples of such things. Even Finland neutrality and good relations with USSR after WWII and Sweden denial to invest and cooperate with Finland at the same time is colorful example of how that Nordic fight under the carpet look like.
Really, nobody cares about that in Russia. Most people already get that NATO is a bunch of pedos without real weapons. Some come to Victory Park to take a look on heap of overpriced and unreliable NATO weapons, but that's all.
It was my attempt to imagine some "Russian shill reason" for you to get some lulz. Worked brilliant. You didn't even know anything about Sweden-Finland history, obviously.
Continue to think so, it is very helpful for my country. :)
Meanwhile, what's with that insane obsession with seas and ships? Is it some kind of British arrogance, that came from short period of time when this small and unsignificant island built huge fleet and began to terrorize other lands they have no business in at all?
Seas and ports are not so significant today. And if you are still obsessed with this nonexistent importance of all that sea/fleet/navy crap of past ceturies, then you could just take a map and look at the length of Russian shoreline. And what is most important - vast part of that shoreline is fundamentally unaccessible for any rival. But perfectly OK for Russian fleet, including submarines.
IDK, does showing your arrogance and ignorance publicly is kind of pride thing for you? I mean like that LGBTXYZ+ perverts who making pride from publicly showing their ilnesses and perversions?
West have no any chance against Russia, unless it accept it as equal and finally understand that we have different way of thinking and different set of virtues. The funny thing is if West finally does that, the whole narrative of eternal West-Russia opposition will become void. :)
Most Russkie soldiers in Ukraine are Asians from the far east.
Complete bullshit from NAFO losers textbook. :)
So, why wouldn't I support Ukraine?
Ukriane is less white than Russia due to Osman Empire raids and occupation. If you make genetic test on "Ukrainian" you will find Pole or Russian with some Turk addition. This Turk addition usually make hair and eyes darker. Like Bulgars or Serbs who was under Osman Empire occupation.
They are defending their ancestral homeland
No "ancestral homeland" could be named "Ukraine" which is literally "outskirts" or "borderlands" in all slavic languages.
Also, "Ukrainians", being completly fictional nation created by politicians, with artificial language and non-existent history can't have any ancestry fundamentally.
Find how many etnicities lives in Russia, account it their Motherland and ready to fight for it.
This dude is obviously not Russian. He is Kalmyk or even Evenk and with high probability he is proud of his etnicity.
One of global differencies between West and Russia is that West nearly destroyed ethnicity replacing it with citizenship. Even word "nationality" was perverted, like words "vaccine" or "trade". Word "nationality" comes from latin "natio" which means the same as greek "ethnos" and means etnicity, people of one blood.
In Russia etnicity and citizenship are completely different things. Whe have two different words - "Русский" и "Россиянин" to clearly distinguish between "Russian" as etnicity and "Russian" as citizenship. But the West always use that "Russian" term without any clarification. It is always funny to read something like "Russian oligarch Abramovich" or "Russian poet Pasternak".
West is completely supressed any ethnic self-conscionness by changing western languages and giving another meaning to the terms.
You just have no even lexical means to support any reasonable conversation on the topic of Russian (as country) antropology, etnicity relations, culture and all other stuff. :)
You can't distinguish "Русский" from "Россиянин", you can't distinguish citizenship from etnicity and for completely unknown reason believe that "Ukrainian" could be etnicity. :)
It is just like talking with blind about colors or with deaf about music. Even worse, blind at least heard about colors, and deaf could read about music. In your case, you even have no proper lexicon to talk about such matters. :)
Genetically, "Ukrainians" are two different branches of slavs - Poles and Russians. Kind of 50/50 in Ukrainian SSR times with deduction of Crimea (40/60 with it). Plus some Romanians and Hungarians. It is no way "homogenous" by any means. :)
As for Russians (as etnicity), it is one of the most homogenous etniciry in the world of such size. Even largest China and India etnicities have less homogenity. You could easily find that in antropologist scientific articles.
You will find average Russians there too. Compare with average Ukrainians and tell me, who is more white. :)
And notice - dude who did that work is "African American", hardly he could distinguish europeans like we, so there is definitely can't be any personal bias.
If you are not aware, Russian genes are dominant. That is why you will not find any noticeable traces of Golden Horde or any other attempts to occupy Russia in our blood. That is why Globalist Cabal hate us so much. That is why we are the last resort of dying West. Even if Western elites finalize their dream of creating grey race on the West, we will still be able to save White Race. If you will still be able to want that.
Fuck you with your retarded thinking. Unless you will be able to create new words in your native language you think on, to desribe necessary terms and concepts, there could not be any reasonable discussion.
Your phrase have at least 4 completely different meaning in my language. 3 of them are senseless and one is inherently false.
Only white Russians (as citizens) are real Russians (as citizens) - false
Only white Russians (as citizens) are real Russians (as etnicity) - senseless
Only white Russians (as etnicity) are real Russians (as citizens) - senseless
Only white Russians (as etnicity) are real Russians (as etnicity) - senseless
Do you understand how completely retarded your understanding of even such simple Russian matter? And there is nothing in your mentality to get any clue about it. You don't have lexicon to do that, you don't have imagination to contain such things, you have no way to think about it in your terms. And it is just a surface layer, I will not even try to explain much more complex things like Russian by soul (ex. famous poet A.Pushkin, ancestor of Ephiopian nigger Ibragim Gannibal), Russian by recognition and other things, that is completely alien for you.
You don't have (and obvioulsy don't want to obtain) any means in your mentality to understand that. That simple.
Good. Letting Sweden into nato would be like letting Ireland or Somalia into NATO. in other words Sweden will be a pathetic weak link which enables Russia to more easily spread the Russian Peace into Europe and save Europeans from America and the jewropean union.
American troops are now more thinly spread out in order to assist another freeloading welfare state which views anything masculine as toxic.
Kek
Any day now, Russia will unleash their real troops and equipment. Anything until now was just a ruse.
This was retarded 2 years ago and it's even more retarded today.
Not sure why a “Ruskie Shill” would want Sweden to join NATO. This just increases the likelihood of a costly accident, etc.
But Sweden already did joint ops with NATO before. So not sure how much change this really represents.
Edit: To be super-clear, Sweden and Finland joining NATO is still super-stupid. That was probably Blinkin’s retarded idea or something. Gonna get us all killed…..
It's not very complex, really.
There could be following logic:
Finland was created by Russian Empire from part of Sweden after Swedish-Russian war. Swedes account Finns as subhumans and Finns was happy to obtain their own state inside Russian Empire and become free from Swedes.
So, Finns and Swedes are long-time enemies. Something like Greece and Turkey, or Germany and France.
More enemies in one alliance, more tensions will appear inside that alliance. And for the most decisions NATO need unilateral vote of all members. So, adding Finland-Sweden enemy pair into already very unstable alliance NATO make things worse for itself.
And to clarify, no version of NATO is up to the task of fighting Russia at this time, and folks inside NATO have been squabbling like little cunts for decades. Because they are European cunts + American cunts. So adding Sweden and Finland to that won’t change things much, in that regard.
If NATO is not threat to Russia, why did Russia invade Ukraine?
Nowhere did I say NATO is not a threat to Russia. They can certainly cause trouble, and could release any number of NBC threats.
My point is/was that in their current srste of strength, cannot win a land war against Russia. And when one adds Russian missile capability, the picture gets even worse for NATO.
NATO's mothballed old equipment ist holding back everything that Russia can trhow at Ukraine.
You think their new gear won't smash Russia to bits?
Swedes and Fins get along fine. Sure, there is history there. In my experience these days it’s more like taking the piss out of your cousin. Not Jets vs. Sharks.
Yes, like Turks and Greeks.
Nordic temper and way of doing business. They will not make a show from that. They will not do some small and silly shit. But will do maximum shit to each other in most important moment. History of Sweden-Finland relations have multiple examples of such things. Even Finland neutrality and good relations with USSR after WWII and Sweden denial to invest and cooperate with Finland at the same time is colorful example of how that Nordic fight under the carpet look like.
Is that what they are saying in Russia?
Cope harder.
Really, nobody cares about that in Russia. Most people already get that NATO is a bunch of pedos without real weapons. Some come to Victory Park to take a look on heap of overpriced and unreliable NATO weapons, but that's all.
It was my attempt to imagine some "Russian shill reason" for you to get some lulz. Worked brilliant. You didn't even know anything about Sweden-Finland history, obviously.
If NATO is not threat to Russia, why did Russia invade Ukraine?
One of the excuses that Russia had for invading Ukraine was NATO getting too close to their borders.
Now the whole Baltic Sea is surrounded by NATO and Russia has another 1000km of border with NATO.
Big mind plan, really.
Continue to think so, it is very helpful for my country. :)
Meanwhile, what's with that insane obsession with seas and ships? Is it some kind of British arrogance, that came from short period of time when this small and unsignificant island built huge fleet and began to terrorize other lands they have no business in at all?
Seas and ports are not so significant today. And if you are still obsessed with this nonexistent importance of all that sea/fleet/navy crap of past ceturies, then you could just take a map and look at the length of Russian shoreline. And what is most important - vast part of that shoreline is fundamentally unaccessible for any rival. But perfectly OK for Russian fleet, including submarines.
IDK, does showing your arrogance and ignorance publicly is kind of pride thing for you? I mean like that LGBTXYZ+ perverts who making pride from publicly showing their ilnesses and perversions?
West have no any chance against Russia, unless it accept it as equal and finally understand that we have different way of thinking and different set of virtues. The funny thing is if West finally does that, the whole narrative of eternal West-Russia opposition will become void. :)
Most Russkie soldiers in Ukraine are Asians from the far east.
So, why wouldn't I support Ukraine? They are defending their ancestral homeland against Asian invaders.
Complete bullshit from NAFO losers textbook. :)
Ukriane is less white than Russia due to Osman Empire raids and occupation. If you make genetic test on "Ukrainian" you will find Pole or Russian with some Turk addition. This Turk addition usually make hair and eyes darker. Like Bulgars or Serbs who was under Osman Empire occupation.
No "ancestral homeland" could be named "Ukraine" which is literally "outskirts" or "borderlands" in all slavic languages.
Also, "Ukrainians", being completly fictional nation created by politicians, with artificial language and non-existent history can't have any ancestry fundamentally.
https://eutoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Asian-soldier.png
Find some Ukrainians who look like this.
Ukraine is ethnically very homogeneous, unlike Russia whose white people are getting outbred by Asians and Muslims
Find how many etnicities lives in Russia, account it their Motherland and ready to fight for it.
This dude is obviously not Russian. He is Kalmyk or even Evenk and with high probability he is proud of his etnicity.
One of global differencies between West and Russia is that West nearly destroyed ethnicity replacing it with citizenship. Even word "nationality" was perverted, like words "vaccine" or "trade". Word "nationality" comes from latin "natio" which means the same as greek "ethnos" and means etnicity, people of one blood.
In Russia etnicity and citizenship are completely different things. Whe have two different words - "Русский" и "Россиянин" to clearly distinguish between "Russian" as etnicity and "Russian" as citizenship. But the West always use that "Russian" term without any clarification. It is always funny to read something like "Russian oligarch Abramovich" or "Russian poet Pasternak".
West is completely supressed any ethnic self-conscionness by changing western languages and giving another meaning to the terms.
You just have no even lexical means to support any reasonable conversation on the topic of Russian (as country) antropology, etnicity relations, culture and all other stuff. :)
You can't distinguish "Русский" from "Россиянин", you can't distinguish citizenship from etnicity and for completely unknown reason believe that "Ukrainian" could be etnicity. :)
It is just like talking with blind about colors or with deaf about music. Even worse, blind at least heard about colors, and deaf could read about music. In your case, you even have no proper lexicon to talk about such matters. :)
I could easily find much worse. :) https://dnr-news.ru/society/2023/03/10/261709.html
And in addition, the absolutely worst possible thing you could ever imagine - https://t.me/AussieCossack/13914
So "White", so European.
Genetically, "Ukrainians" are two different branches of slavs - Poles and Russians. Kind of 50/50 in Ukrainian SSR times with deduction of Crimea (40/60 with it). Plus some Romanians and Hungarians. It is no way "homogenous" by any means. :)
As for Russians (as etnicity), it is one of the most homogenous etniciry in the world of such size. Even largest China and India etnicities have less homogenity. You could easily find that in antropologist scientific articles.
Russians looks like that - https://avatars.dzeninfra.ru/get-zen_doc/271828/pub_65b62b83a4f0b521042580a2_65b7e2fc386a4754bbcff236/scale_1200
This is what more or less you will see on the streets of any Russian city from StPetersburg to Vladivostok, through all 11 time zones.
Relatively recent third-party study on how people in different countries look like: https://pmsol3.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/world-of-averages-europeave/
You will find average Russians there too. Compare with average Ukrainians and tell me, who is more white. :)
And notice - dude who did that work is "African American", hardly he could distinguish europeans like we, so there is definitely can't be any personal bias.
If you are not aware, Russian genes are dominant. That is why you will not find any noticeable traces of Golden Horde or any other attempts to occupy Russia in our blood. That is why Globalist Cabal hate us so much. That is why we are the last resort of dying West. Even if Western elites finalize their dream of creating grey race on the West, we will still be able to save White Race. If you will still be able to want that.
Mic drop.
"Only white Russians are real Russians"
You could have just said that and spared yourself all that drivel.
Fuck you with your retarded thinking. Unless you will be able to create new words in your native language you think on, to desribe necessary terms and concepts, there could not be any reasonable discussion.
Your phrase have at least 4 completely different meaning in my language. 3 of them are senseless and one is inherently false.
Do you understand how completely retarded your understanding of even such simple Russian matter? And there is nothing in your mentality to get any clue about it. You don't have lexicon to do that, you don't have imagination to contain such things, you have no way to think about it in your terms. And it is just a surface layer, I will not even try to explain much more complex things like Russian by soul (ex. famous poet A.Pushkin, ancestor of Ephiopian nigger Ibragim Gannibal), Russian by recognition and other things, that is completely alien for you.
You don't have (and obvioulsy don't want to obtain) any means in your mentality to understand that. That simple.
You are the one objecting to my earlier comments with your rambling wall of text how the picture I posted wasn't a Russian.
It really upsets you that non whites count as Russian, doesn't it?