I notice that all alternate media seems to be related to one another (at least the bigger voices)
Either they are in sync through parroting or they are being directed either organically or artificially.
All the 'good guys' seem to be once again controlled in some way.
I don't want to bash the good messages that they are spreading, but it seems a little too insync. All the pop culture stuff seems eerily close....like they are all cousins.....
Why is it that Ben Shapiro, Gina Carano, Dana White, Joe Rogan, Doomcock, Nerdrotic, Tim Pool, Bud Lite, UFC, Nike, Kanye, Alex Jones, Laura Loomer, Joy Reid, Russel Brand, Dr. Phil, etc...
Why are the same celebrities always the source of the information....they constantly call out the MSM (legacy) and yet they also are always pointing to them and shining a spotlight on them or using them for their own content.
Again, it's nice to have some minor support, but it always seems so artificially boosted. All the main voices are always out of some small group who seem to know eachother since way back or suddenly live in the same towns, or states....it's all too weird...
All the media, even the podcasters who are relatively smaller all seem to be in a club when they suddenly are all talking the same way, or they are promoting the same ideas one after another as if to somehow try to each repeat the talking points...or perhaps a few clubs, but the dichotomy seems so artificial to me.
YouTube loves to serve up the chosen dissecting voices, but it is either creating these clubs itself or they are being paid for through ads.
I don't think we can have good media anymore even if we avoid the AI content, it will always be just the select voices....
I would be surprised if someone on here can post something actually quality and niche that is not some sponsored or subscriber based corporation that has established partnerships with these clubs.
Some of the 'fringe' stuff is so small as well. Like the FE community only has a few dozen people who provide source material, so even if it is compelling, no dialogue is evolving around it...because it just ends up with the same content creators owning the space completely.
Ands it's being uswd against us especially...tartaria.... It screams of foreign (non west) invaders trying to claim the greatness of the Greeks, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Celts, etx as theirs....
At the same time....Christians vs Pagans vs Science vs Athiests...and now we have Jews vs Muslims on the side (notice how neither even mentions Christians)
I am not sure what is going on, but the odds are, the internet is not trustworthy, and if it was not written down prior to the internet...it should probably be based on something physical for evidence, otherwise it is just story telling....
The problem is that ads are used by all sides to make money and they love saying that advertising won't go near them, but that is not always true and many just hide the advertising better or do a hidden ad.
They have done much to remove physical goods and will continue to do so. The truth is not good for TPTB, but without power, the truth doesn't always set you free either.
We are being ensnared in a false sense of 'winning' and meanwhile they are tinkering away at the processes.
Expect digital IDs still, expect it to come from previously staunch opponents who somehow do not realise the differences are negligible in the new format....and they will use the elections to do it.
Great post OP!
When you take it one step further, you find out many these talking points they all seem to adopt out of nowhere come from think tanks like the heritage foundation, seeded by money from the petroleum industry.
I wish there was a way of sourcing all the think tanks and their outlets. It would be much easier to know who is funding these ideas. I would like to know if there is any sincerity to them, or if they are just mouthpieces that need to obfuscate the board one more round and push the psyops along.
Everyone you mentioned is either a plant or a useful idiot being propped up. There's real opposition but it's not "alt mainstream" in any sense. People like AJ are basically Emmanuel Goldstein (who's in reality O'Brian) of 1984. What's the point of revelation-of-the-method books like Orwell's when people can't figure it out when it plays right before their (wide shut) eyes?
Yes. Real independent thinking is hard. True knowing even harder. People want to belong (to a group). Molding people's opinions and reactions without them noticing is trivially easy. Power comes from asymmetric knowledge and moving masses via controlled narratives.
We are all susceptible to the same forces and methods. Awareness doesn't guarantee immunity.
Solution? Disengage. Go silent. Recenter. Let go of stories, camps, and beliefs.
How? Truth is a pathless land, go discover ...
Yeah but that assymetric knowledge these days is not gossip, rumours, or paparazzi style journalism. It's deals that are made by the industry and those are based on underlying assets and infrastructure.
We cannot stop with memes, only shed light, but ultimately the real power is in the infrastructure. We like to imagine that we can push the needle, but that would ultimately mean it results in real action and no longer just speculation and hopeful rhetoric or doomsayers on the other side.
If we are still complaining in a year we have failed....two years ever more....and so on....
The point is not just to walk away on some stoic journey while you try to ignore the skin melting from your bones and call that distraction 'truth'....nor should you aim for the truth past the moment that survival is no longer an option.
Time and place and purpose....not just one. These things are nothing until realized.
Cue: "sounds like violence...." 🤣
Agreed.
More you complain, more you are engaging and wasting your free consciousness on somebody else's mind stuff.
You can be aware, but disengage.
These things should not move you one way or the other. They just are.
If you are emotionally hooked/resisting/fighting then they've get you exactly where they want you to be.
Aka within (in) fractured (fra) structure...aka fractal (perception) within structure of whole (perceivable) aka power of resistance (life) within power of velocity (inception towards death) aka fractured matter within structural motion.
The suggested information by others tempts aggregation of fractions; while ignoring perceivable structure, and ignorance diminishes ones power of resistance.
Being implies resulting reaction (life) within real action (inception towards death). A reaction cannot act...only respond to being enacted upon. Motion exists before matter can respond to it.
...a suggested end (death) to a perceivable sentence (life).
Motion (time) generating momentum (place) for matter (purpose)...all for one and one for all.
How to corrupt this? By suggesting time (past; present; future) apart from motion; that place differs from ones position at center of all , and that purpose implies outcome, instead of ones response (matter) to origin (motion).
EVERY one implies ones consent to suggested pluralism; EACH one implies ones self discernment among others. Every implies the group one is being tricked to be a part of, each implies the nature of being a partial within a whole.
A chosen few mediate suggested information to a many, who by free will of choice alternate in-between wanting vs not wanting the suggested.
The relation between consent and suggestion implies a bondage aka restraint of a person's liberty by compulsion aka a vow, promise, oath, contract, or a law.
a) Same direction (inception towards death) generates different positions (life)...that's how a synchronous whole differs partials internally.
b) Position (life) within direction (inception towards death) implies resistance within velocity...others suggest one to follow directions towards outcomes, while ignoring to resist origin.
This consensual following of suggested orders/directions implies artificial synchronicity.
Good implies within a conflict of reason against bad. All these conflicts are controlled by those who suggest what others are reasoning about.
Example...few suggest porn; many consent to want (good) or not want (bad) it. This tempts many against one another within a controlled environment called "reason" aka want vs not want or good vs bad or moral vs immoral or hot vs not etc.
Being for or against suggested implies consenting to suggestion (fiction) over perception (reality), and the resulting fight (reason) is only among those consenting to fiction; not against those suggesting fiction within reality.
Already happening...do vs don't aka want vs not want aka good vs bad. Three conflicts of reason within one sentence uttered, and you're mentally engaged within all of them simultaneously.
Reasoning implies the bashing of self and others within a suggested ring, and it doesn't matter from what side one bashes at; who one bashes at; why one bashes at, or if one wins or looses...only that one willingly consent to remain within those conflicts of reason, where the many are grinding each others resistance to dust, while the few remain outside the ring...outside of reason (fiction); within implication (reality).
Because celebrating others tempts one to ignore being within source of inspiration...others suggest "always" to distract one from being (life) within way of all (inception towards death).
Information (suggested words) can only be shaped within inspiration (perceivable sound)...perception implies original; suggestion implies remake. Anything others are suggesting implies sloppy seconds to what nature is offering.
I regularly post links to The Quash and believe him to be entirely unique in his analysis and discussion. Definitely not controlled op. https://podcastaddict.com/podcast/the-quash/3017371
Will check it