Heya....so I definitely disagree with some of you like the plague...but I appreciate that I can have a disagreement and that I get a different opinion.
My belief is that we are just under socialised online, and have a political lense that has been put under pressure from those in our lives such that we are defensive for reasons even unknown to us.
I would really like to hear some of your thoughts without a text-based filter. I am thinking of maybe starting a podcast that can connect random strangers around the world and have them discuss topics that may be controversial.
I would like to perhaps hear from some of you and get a conversation online. Live chat or pre-recorded, but ultimately allow some of us who wish to perhaps explore the topics.....I know we all sound so arrogant on here....I am sure that if we had a real chat it may lead somewhere...
I mean, let's be real for a moment....this place is connected to powerful inside voices....not many but some .....how do I know....some of this stuff is posted here and then a few weeks later shows up or a few days shows up on media sources...
So we either are a conduit or we are a spout....either way....someone feeds us stuff before the media gets it...or we are valuable enough to the media.
I know that my own voice is not important but it does still offer Insight...and I do believe I have something to offer....even if just opinions.
I would love to work with some of yourselves to maybe start an open dialog.
I am Canadian....so if you are worried that I am some kind of spy...well...its canukistan so ... Take it as you will...
I would like to at least try and do more than just post.....so send me a message or reply and I wilk reach out...
It would he good to have a list of ideas or topics...as I am not omniscient...so I cannot know all or will I be able to offer very good opinions on all topics.
But food for thought.
a) Reasoning about suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable/knowledge.
b) UN - "prefix of reversal, deprivation, or removal"...consenting to suggested reverses ones perception; deprives ones of sight within perceivable and distracts one from responding (re) to being moved (moval).
Suggested words within perceivable sound imply the text-based filter (letters) of spell-craft. One doesn't think in words until one consented to a suggested language (shaped by letters) aka to a filter by others for ones thoughts.
a) Controversial aka contra-versus aka control-verse...controlling others by suggested verses, while tempting them against one another within conflicts of reason.
b) Suggested information implies a topic upon the foundation of perceivable inspiration, hence all topics being controversial.
a) More words; less response-time for thought...leading to babel (confusion; disorder) aka babble (to prate; talk thoughtlessly).
b) Talk shows were suggested by few towards many to lead them to were they are now...
c) Being implies centered (perception) within everything (perceivable)...that's the only place to be. Others suggest "somewhere/anywhere else" to lure one off-center.
a) AR'ROGANCE, noun (Latin arrogo, to claim; desire) - "taking much upon one's self"...suggesting arrogance in the name of others implies ones desired claim.
b) Suggested "we all" implies an inversion of being one partial within all.
Media/medius/middle cannot be source...only surrounding can cause a middle. Being implies middle (life) of surrounding (inception towards death).
a) Only nature offers (inception) and withdrawals (death) produce (life).
b) To believe implies buying into (consent) what others sell (suggestion), while ignoring to be offering (perception) within offer (perceivable).
DIA (duo; two) LOG (logos; logic) confines ones free will of choice within a conflict of reason against other ones.
a) F
b) CAN (to know) ADA (Hebrew adha; ornament) aka accessory to knowledge.
OMNI (all) SCIENT (knowledge)...being implies within all perceivable knowledge. Suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo, nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
Only within all knowledge (perceivable) can one be (perception).
Being implies enabled to wield free "will" of choice.
Suggested information implies appetite (want); perceivable inspiration implies hunger (need)...try letting thoughts starve a while.
tim pool
The vast majority of users here are paid political propagandists here in bad faith.
They must not be very good at their jobs
Maybe. Maybe not. I see lots of fox news/heritage foundation talking points getting regurgitated here.
Man i sincerely hope not! God, how boring if so!
Human beings repeating talking points? I'm sure you've never done that.