the "return" mission has been touted since about 2003. It's been delayed every few years for a few more years, for almost 25 years. Yet NASA regularly gets a budget about equivalent, adjusted for inflation, to what they spent on the entire Apollo missions, over the same amount of time. So I guess the technology just hasn't caught up with the late 1960's/early 1970's yet.
Once we have live coverage? Live coverage of their fake lander that had supposedly already landed? How could they show live coverage now? None of it will be live and all of it is fake.
It's possible because the moon exists and humans have the technology to get there. you need a rocket, a spaceship, space suits and good navigation systems.
there you go. your turn.
also, why don;t you answer my question? once we have live coverage of the landing will you dismiss it outright? y
I wouldn’t believe it because it isn’t possible, like I said. “Humans have the technology to get there” is false. If we did, we would have already landed. NASA said we lost the tech so now what? To start, explain, in detail, how humans in spacecraft can survive navigating through the Van Allen belt.
The flat earthers are renting a U Haul in preparation for a Patriot Front march to prove there is no moon. They will release Stanley Kubrick from the prison where he's been held for decades and he will spill all soon. Biden won by 80 gazillion votes.
Literally zero real footage. You're probably one of the faggots sitting at the computers for the fake ass mission. Fuck off shill.
Posting shitty news articles doesn't mean it happened because they said "touch down".
I’m not a flat earther buuuut, this seems like a nothing event considering we sent humans to the Moon in 1969, right?
It's preparation for the manned moon mission.
the "return" mission has been touted since about 2003. It's been delayed every few years for a few more years, for almost 25 years. Yet NASA regularly gets a budget about equivalent, adjusted for inflation, to what they spent on the entire Apollo missions, over the same amount of time. So I guess the technology just hasn't caught up with the late 1960's/early 1970's yet.
They literally just landed a spacecraft on the moon.
What exactly are you complaining about?
No space no moon.
Yeah, that’s not possible and will never happen.
To you retarded downvoters:
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/moon-lander-tipped-over-touchdown-sending-shares-intuitive-machines-crashing-late-friday
and once we have live coverage on the landing, you will declare it all to be fake without providing any evidence for your claim, am I right?
Once we have live coverage? Live coverage of their fake lander that had supposedly already landed? How could they show live coverage now? None of it will be live and all of it is fake.
Thank you for proving my point.
Tell me your reasons why you think humans landing on the moon is possible and then I’ll tell you why it isn’t. Go.
It's possible because the moon exists and humans have the technology to get there. you need a rocket, a spaceship, space suits and good navigation systems.
there you go. your turn.
also, why don;t you answer my question? once we have live coverage of the landing will you dismiss it outright? y
I wouldn’t believe it because it isn’t possible, like I said. “Humans have the technology to get there” is false. If we did, we would have already landed. NASA said we lost the tech so now what? To start, explain, in detail, how humans in spacecraft can survive navigating through the Van Allen belt.
What kind of bullshit answer is this? You asked why I think it's possible and instead of living up to your commitment you reply with another question?
fuck off. you are not interested in a conversation.
also, this is a lie:
Bit strange we already dont have live coverage in 2024.
The flat earthers are renting a U Haul in preparation for a Patriot Front march to prove there is no moon. They will release Stanley Kubrick from the prison where he's been held for decades and he will spill all soon. Biden won by 80 gazillion votes.