the "return" mission has been touted since about 2003. It's been delayed every few years for a few more years, for almost 25 years. Yet NASA regularly gets a budget about equivalent, adjusted for inflation, to what they spent on the entire Apollo missions, over the same amount of time. So I guess the technology just hasn't caught up with the late 1960's/early 1970's yet.
Once we have live coverage? Live coverage of their fake lander that had supposedly already landed? How could they show live coverage now? None of it will be live and all of it is fake.
I’m not a flat earther buuuut, this seems like a nothing event considering we sent humans to the Moon in 1969, right?
It's preparation for the manned moon mission.
the "return" mission has been touted since about 2003. It's been delayed every few years for a few more years, for almost 25 years. Yet NASA regularly gets a budget about equivalent, adjusted for inflation, to what they spent on the entire Apollo missions, over the same amount of time. So I guess the technology just hasn't caught up with the late 1960's/early 1970's yet.
They literally just landed a spacecraft on the moon.
What exactly are you complaining about?
No space no moon.
Yeah, that’s not possible and will never happen.
To you retarded downvoters:
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/moon-lander-tipped-over-touchdown-sending-shares-intuitive-machines-crashing-late-friday
and once we have live coverage on the landing, you will declare it all to be fake without providing any evidence for your claim, am I right?
Once we have live coverage? Live coverage of their fake lander that had supposedly already landed? How could they show live coverage now? None of it will be live and all of it is fake.
Tell me your reasons why you think humans landing on the moon is possible and then I’ll tell you why it isn’t. Go.