I read it. You don’t have to trust his opinion, it’s just his opinion, but people can be wrong and then correct later. You are trying to discredit his later observations on clotting, which has been confirmed elsewhere, by associating it with his earlier opinions, which were/are wrong.
All of this is missing the point that Elon’s platform still censors free speech.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/john-o-looney-piers-corbyn-anti-vaxxer-covid-vaccine-coronavirus-162233353.html?guccounter=1
that guy?
Yeah, what does his opinion on covid being a real virus (it isn’t) have to do with witnessed and confirmed post-vax clotting in the deceased?
For months he sold his opinion as the truth until he had to confess that it was bullshit.
Why should I trust this opinion of him?
Did you even read what OP linked to? It's just a wall of rambling text.
I read it. You don’t have to trust his opinion, it’s just his opinion, but people can be wrong and then correct later. You are trying to discredit his later observations on clotting, which has been confirmed elsewhere, by associating it with his earlier opinions, which were/are wrong.
All of this is missing the point that Elon’s platform still censors free speech.