You have overlooked the necessary components of 3D rendering....that ball is not modelling the surface properties of the moon in any way. And the sun is not emitting enough light and if they apply directional light as opposed to point light....
It's complexity that has been overlooked...your model is broken and simple. No matter your intentions, this is a bad....bad...example.
Download Blender....spend 10 hours learning some basics...and come back ..
Do I have to explain to you that sun does not rise behind the moon? Nor is it behind the moon at night.
Can you explain why every search engine returns composites for the terms "moon sunrise", while the moon is often visible during the day, making this a commonly photographed phenomenon?"
I'm not going to call myself a great artist or anything but here's a simplified diagram of how your perspective relative to the moon changes how much of the reflection you can see. https://imgur.com/a/hkWd2MG
Unfortunately I'm not able to draw in 3d. But you hopefully begin to see how the earth could find itself "behind" the moon at an angle like the photo of the ball.
Obviously looking at it from different angles is how you see full, 3/4, 1/2, and 1/4 reflections on a sphere. This should inform your perspective of how you see the moon at different positions in it's revolution around the earth. Not sure why the Earth's rotation or your position relative to the equator would have anything to do with it.
Who fucking cares? Cartels selling children, people being destroyed by inflation, corrupt politicians profiting from leeching off the labor of their citizens -- and you are concerned with this shit.
Even if it comes out tomorrow that the earth is flat and the sun is a lie or that we are in a simulation who the fuck cares? What does it change?
Focus on the issues that we know about rather than make conjecture about things that don't affect anyone regardless.
Pretty much everything in our everyday lives reflects light.(haha the irony here being thats what we actually see, is not the objects themselves, but the light/energy bouncing off of it.) And the moon itself reflects quite a bit of it. I can see near perfectly when a full moon is out.
The issue here is you have to understand there are some key differences between something like the sun, and a point light which is what looks like is being used in this 3d scene.
The sun is so big, so bright, so far away, and emits light as a disc, not a point. They do not create the same effects.
REFLECT', verb (Latin reflecto; re and flecto, to bend) aka light (inception towards death) bending (life). The RE in reflect implies oneself as the reacting inflection; curvature; strain; that which is directed to a point within the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion).
Often times in the morning, the sun rises to the East while the moon is waxing from above to the South. Clearly, being able to see both, above the horizon, the full face of the moon should be visible, with no crescent shape.
Yet the opposite is true. And there are no computer models that allow for a crescent shape refection off of a sphere.
Indeed. This shill consistently applies the Flat Earth kind of illogic over and over, no connection to real physics at all. I assume he's here to wear people down and waste their resources.
Sorry, but your model is fundamentally wrong.
You have overlooked the necessary components of 3D rendering....that ball is not modelling the surface properties of the moon in any way. And the sun is not emitting enough light and if they apply directional light as opposed to point light....
It's complexity that has been overlooked...your model is broken and simple. No matter your intentions, this is a bad....bad...example.
Download Blender....spend 10 hours learning some basics...and come back ..
Then clearly you can provide an image that gives us a crescent shaped lighting on a sphere.
https://www.google.com/search?q=shpere+rendering&tbm=isch
Take your time. Any image will do.
Here you go. https://imgur.com/a/4Nx5OId
Amazing. Now put the light source in front of the sphere, and not behind it. While accomplish the same effect.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/17sOxE5QtV/not-reflecting/c/4Z8k2php6We
Do I have to explain to you that sun does not rise behind the moon? Nor is it behind the moon at night.
Can you explain why every search engine returns composites for the terms "moon sunrise", while the moon is often visible during the day, making this a commonly photographed phenomenon?"
I'm not going to call myself a great artist or anything but here's a simplified diagram of how your perspective relative to the moon changes how much of the reflection you can see. https://imgur.com/a/hkWd2MG
And if we were 2 dimensional beings, I would have to relent.
So am I to assume, you did not render the earlier image?
Nope, took a photo in my garage of the ball.
Unfortunately I'm not able to draw in 3d. But you hopefully begin to see how the earth could find itself "behind" the moon at an angle like the photo of the ball.
That would explain how amazingly "high quality" the textures and lighting on this render were.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca-e5MrVbVU
Obviously looking at it from different angles is how you see full, 3/4, 1/2, and 1/4 reflections on a sphere. This should inform your perspective of how you see the moon at different positions in it's revolution around the earth. Not sure why the Earth's rotation or your position relative to the equator would have anything to do with it.
Of course. Position is relevant, when you cite it, but not me. The sun is Schrodinger's light source.
And for some reason you are bringing up the equator, when I was not discussing it at at all?
And I am now realizing that you are not u/MindlessRationality.
Which explains why your hollow argument doesn't match up with his.
In fact, neither of you have addressed a single thing I have said.
Why is that?
I tried.
Follow up Questions;
Who fucking cares? Cartels selling children, people being destroyed by inflation, corrupt politicians profiting from leeching off the labor of their citizens -- and you are concerned with this shit.
Even if it comes out tomorrow that the earth is flat and the sun is a lie or that we are in a simulation who the fuck cares? What does it change?
Focus on the issues that we know about rather than make conjecture about things that don't affect anyone regardless.
That only works on reflective surfaces. The moon is not reflective.
Pretty much everything in our everyday lives reflects light.(haha the irony here being thats what we actually see, is not the objects themselves, but the light/energy bouncing off of it.) And the moon itself reflects quite a bit of it. I can see near perfectly when a full moon is out.
The issue here is you have to understand there are some key differences between something like the sun, and a point light which is what looks like is being used in this 3d scene.
The sun is so big, so bright, so far away, and emits light as a disc, not a point. They do not create the same effects.
https://youtu.be/acGMdhJWX2w?t=66
REFLECT', verb (Latin reflecto; re and flecto, to bend) aka light (inception towards death) bending (life). The RE in reflect implies oneself as the reacting inflection; curvature; strain; that which is directed to a point within the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion).
Often times in the morning, the sun rises to the East while the moon is waxing from above to the South. Clearly, being able to see both, above the horizon, the full face of the moon should be visible, with no crescent shape.
Yet the opposite is true. And there are no computer models that allow for a crescent shape refection off of a sphere.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52489417/how-to-create-a-concave-convex-circle-illusion-in-opengl
Though, one can be seen in a concave surface.
fuck off
I’d ask the mods why this obvious paid shill spammer is allowed to post here, but I already know.
Because the community voted for this
I trust you, but I still don’t trust that vote.
Indeed. This shill consistently applies the Flat Earth kind of illogic over and over, no connection to real physics at all. I assume he's here to wear people down and waste their resources.