Short Video Explaining New Bioprinting 3D Brains
(odysee.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
I call bullshit
The truth is that the government funded "scientists" today are pseudo-science government bureaucrat frauds who can't even get a man to the moon without faking it.
If you believe these imbeciles are 3D printing brains you are giving them far more credit them those idiots deserve. They can't 3D print a fucking plastic button for your printer cheaper than it costs to ship you one injection molded. Fuck these frauds.
Agree. But not because of 3D printing. :)
As for 3D printing in general - there are two things to cosider.
First, it is already much cheaper for making things in small series. Creating mold for injection cost more than 3D printer itself.
Second - it is important branch of tech that have huge importance. Switching from carving things from something to creating things from the scratch by assembling them from perticles from scratch is a huge step in how we create things. Today we do it on relatively large scale using large perticles gluing them together, but next obvious step will be doing that on molecular level, and then on atomic level. So we are only two steps away from that SciFi replicators that could make you anything you need from what you have around, which will completely change all economy, and not in the interests of corporations.
Also you could notice some weirdness in 3D printing development. Modern 3D printers could be perfectly in use since early 70s, when first CNC machines was rolled out. There were all necessary components availabe. Really, affordable FDM 3D printer could be easily rolled out to the public along with first cheap personal computers like Sinclair ZX and Commodore 64. But that was delayed for two decades, and I think it was done intentionally with patents and IP laws. I personally did something similar to 3D printing already in late 80s when I make a CNC mill from old written off flatbed plotter, replacing pen head with mill, carving many hand-drawn layers of object I need from flat plywood or plastic and then glueing them together. Sinclair ZX clone was more than enough for that. So idea was pretty obvious and on the surface for a long time before, but was not used by industry.
Then, recall that first affordable 3D printer was made by enthusiasts (RepRap), not by some corporation. Only because RepRap was opensourced, official enterprises was forced to start production of mass-market 3D printers.
Also, as it happened, recall all that attempts to limit, license or prohibit 3D printing with using something like "they will print guns!!!!111" as reason,
Add to that attempts to forcefully copyright/license things files and other stuff to prevent free exchange of thing files between people. Fortunately all that crap eventually failed, however at the time I heard about few real cases against people who printed "copyrighted content" from games and movies.
Today, more accurate and closer to molecular 3D printing SLA printers are artificially delayed by enormous cost of UV curing resin. And interesting, that it is not resin itself that cost a lot. Resin itself is pretty cheap. It is UV sensitive initiators that are patented and declared as intellectual property that cost absolutely insane money per gram. There is some encouraging news from India chemical manufaturers who just stop care about all that patents and IP crap in the light of nowdays events and began to make affordable UV initiators, but volume is too small yet.
And so on. There are a lot of weird things around 3D prinitnng in general that show obvious resistance against that technology from corporations and TPTB.
Interesting. I suspected this half a year ago and everyone thought I was a "conspiracy theorist"
Why Was 3D Printing Technology Stalled? This Was A New Technology That Was Going To Allow Us To Make Our Own Plastic Parts and Cut Out Middleman Manufacturers. Why Is The Technology Suppressed? Seems I Should Be Able To Download Blueprint and Print Any Plastic Part I Need. https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16c2I4yLkS/why-was-3d-printing-technology-s/c
I want to 3D print pikes but cannot find a 3D printer large enough or a plastic material strong enough to support writhing 250lbs corpse.
You are perfectly know that most "conspiracy theories" are just spoilers. :)
You could do it. Kind of. In your 3D editor split your pikes in parts you could print. Glue them after printing in whole thing. Use this model to sand casting your pikes from whatever material you like. Works perfect for me for complex aluminium car parts. See no problems why it whould not work for you for steel. And you could cast as many pikes as you need for your fellows using that 3D printed model.
If you are advanced enough in engineering you could try to combine 3D printer with MIG welder.
Also, it is not a problem to build large 3D printer. It is even not expensive now. Problem will arise with speed of printing that will depend on diameter of extruder jet for FDM printers. Some enthusiasts even was able to print buildings from concrete.
Even with current level of 3D printing tech, I personally find 3D printing extremely useful even for domestic use. Saved me a tons of money and time, and often I was able to print a plastic spare part for broken plasic original that was better and solved problem with that part forever. Unlimited sharing of 3D models for common things among people also helps a lot. Printing NLA parts resolve the problem with programmed obsolescence by manufacturer. Sand casting metal parts using printed model also works perfectly, but I thinking about obtaining some written off x-ray scope to control quality of castings, few times I got cavities inside castings and had to cast and replace part again, thankfully model was already done so that was fast.
Perhaps you could get government subsidies to turn old windmill blades into corpse spikes? Helping the planet and all that jazz!