From the memory perspective...ram adapts to flow (inspiration); hard-drive accumulates form (information). Look at how ram responds if hard-drive reaches capacity...
LOL, what happens when an unstoppable force (ram) meets an immovable object (hard drive)?
I think we solved it boys. The flow reverses without stopping.
what happens when an unstoppable force (ram) meets an immovable object (hard drive)?
a) "meeting" implies matter set apart from one another coming together; which can only happen inside motion, because motion generates momentum (inception towards death) which separates matter (life) from one another.
b) "immovable" implies matter enabled (able) within (im) motion (mov)
c) Others suggest cessation of motion (stop), which implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death). Others also suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing; not) to tempt one consent to de-nial perceivable.
That's how immovable can be defined as "not moving" and a conflict of reason between stoppable vs unstoppable can exist within constant motion by exploiting ones willing denial of reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggestion).
c) Hard-drive implies motion driving (inception towards death) hard matter (life). Living within process of dying also implies a solid-state drive within a liquid system.
d) A ram has access to moving input (perceivable) before a hard-drive can be added to the operating system (perception) for storage (suggested).
RAM (random access memory)
a) RANDOM aka (course without direction) implies oneself wandering (life) within direction (inception towards death); yet lacking self discernment about it.
Motion implies velocity; which implies direction, hence implication (if/then aka from/to aka action/reaction aka loss/growth etc.). Furthermore; the term "without" implies being within (life) outside (inception towards death), hence as choice in-between sides (need/want balance) aka at the ledge of knowing (knowledge).
b) ACCESS implies motion generating entrance (inception) and exit (death) for matter (life) in-between. Inception towards life implies coming to be, hence access granted aka admission to sexual intercourse aka AD'MIT (to suffer to enter) TO (towards) SEXUAL (Latin seco; to divide) INTER (internal) COURSE (solid wandering within fluid direction).
Ones consent to suggestions by others permits other to vet entrance to suggested; hence others being enabled to deny ones access.
c) MEMORY aka MEM (mind) ORY (oration; utter)...utter implies outer, hence outer (perceivable) towards inner (perception). Others mimic utter/outer by uttering suggested words, which distract one from perceivable sound...if one consents. Doing so permits others to write suggested information into ones mind/memory, while oneself ignores perceivable inspiration.
I think we solved it boys
a) Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
b) Ignoring self for others tempts one to ignore being (life) dissolved (inception towards death), hence existing inside (living) a solution (process of dying).
Others suggest one to solve problems and to seek solutions as the inversion of being problem (temporary growth) within solution (ongoing loss). Suggesting others to seek implies "to inquire for; to ask for; to solicit; to endeavor to find or gain by any means" aka a typical merchant sales-pitch, and ones consent implies the price payed for selling self out to others.
If one lacks to comprehend this, then that's because the words others are suggesting implies the ongoing sales-pitch of the happy merchant of temptations, who use spell-craft to solicit fiction (suggested information) into reality (perceivable inspiration), which the suggesting merchant establishes within ones consenting mind/memory.
Wholesale (perceivable) or retail/retell (suggested)...it's ones free will of choice.
flow reverses without stopping
a) Stop (cessation of motion) implies matter willing ignoring motion by holding onto other matter.
b) RE (response to) VERSE (verto, to turn)...being implies wave (growth) within line (loss); if a wave turns within line, then it establishes a tunnel (circular movement) before breaking down, hence top trying to reach its own bottom (ouroboros).
Others tempt one into circular-form (reasoning over suggested); while ignoring wave-form (growth within loss), as to break one on the shore. It's called surfing...any you're doing it within the internal-net right now.
LOL, what happens when an unstoppable force (ram) meets an immovable object (hard drive)?
I think we solved it boys. The flow reverses without stopping.
a) "meeting" implies matter set apart from one another coming together; which can only happen inside motion, because motion generates momentum (inception towards death) which separates matter (life) from one another.
b) "immovable" implies matter enabled (able) within (im) motion (mov)
c) Others suggest cessation of motion (stop), which implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death). Others also suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing; not) to tempt one consent to de-nial perceivable.
That's how immovable can be defined as "not moving" and a conflict of reason between stoppable vs unstoppable can exist within constant motion by exploiting ones willing denial of reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggestion).
c) Hard-drive implies motion driving (inception towards death) hard matter (life). Living within process of dying also implies a solid-state drive within a liquid system.
d) A ram has access to moving input (perceivable) before a hard-drive can be added to the operating system (perception) for storage (suggested).
a) RANDOM aka (course without direction) implies oneself wandering (life) within direction (inception towards death); yet lacking self discernment about it.
Motion implies velocity; which implies direction, hence implication (if/then aka from/to aka action/reaction aka loss/growth etc.). Furthermore; the term "without" implies being within (life) outside (inception towards death), hence as choice in-between sides (need/want balance) aka at the ledge of knowing (knowledge).
b) ACCESS implies motion generating entrance (inception) and exit (death) for matter (life) in-between. Inception towards life implies coming to be, hence access granted aka admission to sexual intercourse aka AD'MIT (to suffer to enter) TO (towards) SEXUAL (Latin seco; to divide) INTER (internal) COURSE (solid wandering within fluid direction).
Ones consent to suggestions by others permits other to vet entrance to suggested; hence others being enabled to deny ones access.
c) MEMORY aka MEM (mind) ORY (oration; utter)...utter implies outer, hence outer (perceivable) towards inner (perception). Others mimic utter/outer by uttering suggested words, which distract one from perceivable sound...if one consents. Doing so permits others to write suggested information into ones mind/memory, while oneself ignores perceivable inspiration.
a) Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
b) Ignoring self for others tempts one to ignore being (life) dissolved (inception towards death), hence existing inside (living) a solution (process of dying).
Others suggest one to solve problems and to seek solutions as the inversion of being problem (temporary growth) within solution (ongoing loss). Suggesting others to seek implies "to inquire for; to ask for; to solicit; to endeavor to find or gain by any means" aka a typical merchant sales-pitch, and ones consent implies the price payed for selling self out to others.
If one lacks to comprehend this, then that's because the words others are suggesting implies the ongoing sales-pitch of the happy merchant of temptations, who use spell-craft to solicit fiction (suggested information) into reality (perceivable inspiration), which the suggesting merchant establishes within ones consenting mind/memory.
Wholesale (perceivable) or retail/retell (suggested)...it's ones free will of choice.
a) Stop (cessation of motion) implies matter willing ignoring motion by holding onto other matter.
b) RE (response to) VERSE (verto, to turn)...being implies wave (growth) within line (loss); if a wave turns within line, then it establishes a tunnel (circular movement) before breaking down, hence top trying to reach its own bottom (ouroboros).
Others tempt one into circular-form (reasoning over suggested); while ignoring wave-form (growth within loss), as to break one on the shore. It's called surfing...any you're doing it within the internal-net right now.