Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

7
Do you guys still remember those days where people still have a grip on reality? I still, but I admitted that we probably have no turning back by this point. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Mrexreturns 1 year ago by Mrexreturns +12 / -5
23 comments share
23 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– IGOexiled 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

I know the pieces fit cause I watched them fall away

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuckFimps 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Can't we just go back to the old days when men just got a girlfriend and didn't complain about degenerate bullshit?

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice -1 points 1 year ago +1 / -2

no turning back

TURN, verb - "to alter as a position; to cause to preponderate; to change the state of a balance"...being implies choice (life) within balance (inception towards death). Ignoring this for the suggestions by others imbalances ones position.

Imbalance implies ones mental state aka a turning of ones mind (tourn-a-ment)...such a martial arts contest within ones mind implies reason aka circular logic.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Modeler43 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Personally I think it'd be interesting to see how stupid you are in person

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

interesting to see how stupid

Interesting aka in-the-rest aka within rest (cessation of motion) + stupid/stupefy/stop (to arrest progress)...being implies resistance (life) within progression (inception towards death) of motion.

Others suggest rest; arrest; arrested development; stop resisting; resistance is futile; stupid; stop motion; stop signs etc. to tempt one to ignore motion, with ignorance representing ones cessation of resistance.

personally I...you in person

You and I aren't by (per) sound (sonos); which sets each instrument within apart from one another. You and I are claims of one over self (I) and others (you) aka dissonant words tempting one to ignore resonance within sound.

to see how stupid

How could one see stupid/stop, when seeing implies a moving transfer from perceivable towards ones perception?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

How could one see stupid

By witnessing their behavior, their poor thought process and conversational skills.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Which each implies within motion...as opposed to stupid/stop https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/stupid

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'm speaking of this definition:

STUPID - adjective - having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

a) Definite implies affixed; speaking implies motion.

b) Verb (expressing motion) exists before adjective (express quality of noun) can be applied to noun (combination of sounds by which a thing is called).

Nature doesn't suggest nouns; it moves sound.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I mean there's no way you speak like this in person, because you'd constantly have to look up these definitions

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ -2 ▼
– Mrexreturns [S] -2 points 1 year ago +2 / -4

We are not Illuminati kid-raping monsters.

An underage fictional character is NOT equal to a real child.

And naked baby pics are not child porn.

The goal is for the UN to make everyone accountable and guilty -- "your nearby shitposter can be a pedophile and a kid raping monster" as the United Nations and the rest of the NWO Elite rape children as they wish.

This is control, not a sudden enlightenment of morals, something that our governments have less and less.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

Are you...speaking for the right to enjoy pornographic material of underage kids, in cartoon form?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Mrexreturns [S] -1 points 1 year ago +1 / -2

And what is banning drawings and parents taking pics of their babies going to achieve? You ban the people who post porn of real children and the actual kid rapists. Also it's clear that this is just newthink when you can post a milf (again drawn) and yeah it doesn't matter because of MuH NumBEr!! It's just mind control for the sake of. Wake up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

And what is banning...parents taking pics of their babies going to achieve?

Bro...what?

Why are you so upset that you can't look at sexual pics of kids?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice -1 points 1 year ago +1 / -2

underage fictional

Does reality define the age of fiction?

NOT equal to a real

In reality...equality (inception towards death aka motion) generates diversity (life aka matter). There cannot be equal matter; because motion differentiates the position of matter constantly.

naked baby pics are not child porn.

Suggested pictures tempt idolatry aka ignoring reality (momentum) for fiction (captured moments). The pictures aren't the real issue; but the fiction to distract from the different perspectives of those looking at it. It's the one choosing to get aroused that defines the suggested idol as PORN (pornē; prostitute; bought; purchased).

Suggestion sells; consent buys into. Merchants suggest a HUB where consenting buyers become the PORN.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy