Why is he, or anyone else on these forums never capable of proving their claims?
Ask him. He’s the one who refuses to do it.
It's simply really. No one can ever prove their claims without an impartial moderator.
No? Literally no? I don’t need anyone else to prove 2+2=4. If you’re wanting to pretend that any “third party” is a “moderator,” then the only thing necessary is an external citation to data that can be independently verified by the person to whom the information is being proven.
“Cite your claims,” in other words. It’s not hard for someone who isn’t making shit up out of thin air. Opinions are fine. Desires are fine. Hopes are fine. But not when they run up against objective reality. Then they’re delusions and dangerously wrong.
Why are you incapable of proving any of your claims?
Why is he, or anyone else on these forums never capable of proving their claims?
It's simply really. No one can ever prove their claims without an impartial moderator. But this should go without saying.
Unless explaining such concepts to a child. ℅
Ask him. He’s the one who refuses to do it.
No? Literally no? I don’t need anyone else to prove 2+2=4. If you’re wanting to pretend that any “third party” is a “moderator,” then the only thing necessary is an external citation to data that can be independently verified by the person to whom the information is being proven.
“Cite your claims,” in other words. It’s not hard for someone who isn’t making shit up out of thin air. Opinions are fine. Desires are fine. Hopes are fine. But not when they run up against objective reality. Then they’re delusions and dangerously wrong.
No one can ever prove their claims without an impartial moderator. But this should go without saying.
So why can’t you answer the question you were asked.