11 () posted 1 year ago by NumbaZero 1 year ago by NumbaZero +11 / -0 9 comments share 9 comments share save hide report block hide replies
If she had evidence, what happened to it? Why wouldn't she just release or get it to someone else to release it? Just not very believable.
Yeah, any of them. Why would you trust a report that says they have evidence and then they don't have evidence. Click bait.
The story was retracted and admitted to be a lie. So the New York Times feels the need to run with it.
Compromised pervs don't reveal the perv system and become their number one enemy.
I'm sure there was no pressure put on her to say it was a lie. Just like there's no chance that anyone did anything nefarious to Epstein to caise his death.
If they had anything on Trump they would have released it in 2016. Unless he is just an actor.
If trump is involved, we need proof to be released ASAP