Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

6
My Guess. They Never Actually existed. Just Like The Missions to The Moon. (patriots.win) Speculation
posted 1 year ago by Questionable 1 year ago by Questionable +8 / -2
18 comments share
18 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Questionable [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

So they can embezzle money by low maintenance, but not by faking a moon landing, or say sending money to Ukraine? And faking an arsenal isn't anything like any of that, as it is a different argument?

Are you controlled opposition, or just trolling for an argument?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Where. The. Ever. Loving. Fuck. Is. Your. Argument. We have hard physical evidence that the missions and their launching systems exist. It’s not possible to question this. You have nothing to add. Military fund embezzlement comes from inflated prices, not by not doing what is claimed to be done, because you can’t fucking hide “not doing” this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Questionable [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I've talked to veterans who have manned the silo keys. The job is not taken seriously, and there are no crews present. But you don't want, or respect empirical evidence. And are not here to have a conversation, but make demands.

You demand evidence, I guess I'll need to find a nuclear scientist, a nuclear engineer, and then form an infiltration crew to raid a military base. But before that, I'll need to raise capital for this venture. So, first step is to run drugs across the border. Be right back. I'm certain this venture will only take a life time.

You argue in bad faith.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I've talked to veterans who have manned the silo keys.

Oh, so you admit that the infrastructure exists and your entire argument is a fucking hoax. Great, thanks. Fuck off.

The job is not taken seriously, and there are no crews present.

No shit. That’s not the thing in question here.

But you don't want, or respect empirical evidence.

The goddamned irony.

And are not here to have a conversation, but make demands.

You make claim. You prove claim. Literally the fundamental point of a conversation. You no prove claim. You claim dismissed off-hand. The only demand is you, demanding that others prove wrong your unsubstantiated bullshit.

You demand evidence, I guess I'll need to find a nuclear scientist, a nuclear engineer, and then form an infiltration crew to raid a military base.

Nope. You’re too stupid to understand your own “argument,” so it’s no wonder you can’t find the publicly available evidence that disproves your own claims.

You argue in bad faith.

Does this work at the synagogue? Like, do other jews fall for this? Because blaming others for what you are doing doesn’t work on whites.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy