“You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God that I command you.” (Deuteronomy 4:2 ESV; see also: Deuteronomy 12:32, Proverbs 30:5-6)
To this day the Papacy of the Roman Catholic church claims authority to be able to change both “the times” and “the law” (see the prophecy in Daniel 7:25). This is clearly manifested in their changing of the Ten Commandments (the complete removal of 2nd commandment on idolatry, the changing of the 4th commandment to “The Lord’s Day” meaning [Sun]day, and to maintain 10, the splitting the 10th commandment in two, becoming the 9th and 10th).
See below comparison between the Bible's list of the Ten Commandments and the Roman Catholic changed version:
Which commandments should we obey; those of a man or those of God?
Please read my recent post, friend
Are you watching Walter Veith’s presentations? Good stuff. Groundbreaking considering it was all in the early 00s
Yes I've seen a couple and they are excellent. Just not a fan of the Ellen G White stuff though.
I’m on lecture 19 of 34. Started his Total Onslaught series a few months ago.
He has mentioned Ellen G White once.
Take it with a grain of salt. He is an excellent scholar and should still be highly regarded.
The ten commandments are just a carbon copy of the 8 fold path in Buddhism.
Oh yea, Moses was totally in contact with disciples of the Buddha when he wrote Exodus.
Wait, that's right, Buddha lived hundreds of years after Moses.
Fuck off.
Yeah you're right that never happened.
What happened was christcucks copied Buddhists homework when they came up with their cult.
But the faggots are here. This place is riddled with them. Grown adults believing in fairy tales. Seems like you might be one of them but I'd hate to assume.... are you a Christian retard?
You're not only a idiot, but an unoriginal idiot, frankly downright boring in such lame a tropic insults.
More unoriginal than the "10 commandments"?
Take the most boring "racist uncle" Arche Bunker shit you've ever seen, then make it milquetoast as if it was on the BBC somewhere.
That's you.
I don't understand these references but I'm sure they're real knee slappers if you're a southern boomer suffering from generational inbreeding and lead poisoning.
Wrong, so wrong it hurts, and I bet you think that was witty too.
Boring. C'mon, give me something new, some real material. Drop your pants if you have too and moon the group.
I would ask everyone to take a look at chapter 20 Exodus in their Bible, for those that don't have one, here is a link, (and I'll even link to a Protestant version): https://www.biblestudytools.com/exodus/20.html
Now, please tell me where the numbering of the verses in chapter 20 match with commandments 1-10.
You see, the verses are not, and never have been, verse 1 = commandment 1.
Everything else about why the Protestant version of the 10 commandments, created 2,500 years or so after Exodus is written, and about 1,300 years since the Christian bible was compiled by the Roman Catholic Church flows from that.
Change (perceivable sound) commands ment/mind...suggested words tempts one to ignore that, because oneself chooses to hold onto definitions (definite; affixed).
a) Words (suggested information) are added to sound (perceivable inspiration) by ones consent to the suggestions of others.
b) One (perception) cannot add to all (perceivable)...only draw from to shape within.