Qui?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
If you're a bot, you had to have been programmed by the late Patrick Winston. If you haven't heard of him you should really look up his work at MIT/OCW. I don't know if his lecture series is still available, but he was awesome. The syllabus was available for every course and if you looked hard enough you could always find the textbook for free online.
a) Why is it that when I write BOT; ROBOT (Latin roboro; robur) - "strength" that others ignore being programmed with suggested revisionism into ignoring "strength" for "artificial intelligence"?
Why is "bot" now used to dehumanize each other; while beforehand it described each others strength?
b) What if reason (are a bot vs aren't a bot) tempts one to ignore implication (if/then)?
Let's go with his bibliography...
Did I miss anything else?
a) Ones consent to suggested words institutes artifice into ones mind/memory.
b) Considering the above...how out there is it for me to notice massachusetts aka CHU (you/jew) SETTS (sets) MASSA (master)?
No shit. Syllabus aka Abstract (Latin abstraho) - "to draw from or separate". It's perceivable cause which separates into each partial perception, which only then allows perception to draw from perceivable.
Any suggested syllabus distracts one from that.
...at suggested information; then you still ignore being within perceivable inspiration. Focusing on suggested narrows ones perspective within perceivable.
Another well thought post. He was starting to use Python toward the end and I learned a great deal from him. Enjoy your New Year