DIA (two) LOG (logic/reason) aka a conflict of reason in-between two sides. Ones consent to reason against others over suggested information implies permission (allow) towards others and submission (deny) of self.
As for "now"...before vs after represents the dia-log for each one who willingly ignores that being can only exist now (life); not before (inception) or after (death).
Hey, are you familiar with "sleepydude" on Substack? The guy himself isn't really important to what I'm asking, what's important is he writes about hidden communications in language, right brain language in a sense, how something means two things, which you seem to definitely grasp, even though I only really have an intuitive sense that you grasp it because I don't grasp it to any significant degree yet. For example I can mostly follow along with what you write but I couldn't easily write the same comments. If I had to guess, I'd say you post the comments that you do as practice, and possibly to open up others to this way of thinking about language. So my question is, do you have any recommendations for reading resources on this broad topic? And outside of posting these comments, how have you developed your ability to see language in this way? Many thanks for any reply or assistance.
Hey, are you familiar with "sleepydude" on Substack?
a) skimmed through it; liked it; bookmarked it. I do season sleeping with naps though.
b) Familiar aka "a spirit called upon" aka a "domestic"...being implies local (life) within domestic (inception towards death), hence needing to adapt (exhale) to impressing (inhale) aka breathing (Latin spiro; spirit; to breathe).
Others suggest "familiar" to destabilize ones local (Latin loco; place; position).
c) If many consent to suggestions by chosen few, then that implies submission to collectivization, hence permitting a chosen few to establish SUB (submissive) STACK (collective). Furthermore...stacking establishes imbalance, hence leading to toppling over upon those willingly submitting under.
Next in line of thinking...stacking high-rises crushes first down-towns and then sub-urbs. Those who stack are "erecting", while cutting off others within "circumference" aka circumcision.
hidden communications in language
a) ATION (action) reveals reactions. Being implies reaction (life) generated within action (inception towards death) aka expression (temporary growth) within impression (ongoing loss).
Others suggest COMM-UNI-ism aka composition of one (singular) into many (plural). Ones consent to any suggested -ism implies the composition aka the contract between consent and suggested aka ones choice to hold onto what another offers aka ones consent to RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka binding self through mercantile law as buyer (consent) to seller (suggestion).
Meanwhile...nature offers everything (perceivable) to each ones (perception) "free" will of choice. The highest value in perceivable existence implies each ones evaluation thereof...others suggest prices to tempt one to devaluate ones evaluation, when consenting to pay.
Furthermore...suggested "cost" tempts one to ignore perceivable "caust" (burning; corroding). Living within the process of dying implies a "burned offering" (holo-caust). Caust also implies Cause of being.
Sleight of hand: "I will not offer burnt offerings without cost" ~ 1 Chronicles 21:24.
b) LAN'GUAGE, noun (Latin lingua, the tongue, and speech) - "human speech; the expression of ideas by words or significant articulate sounds"
The few suggest speech (artifice; fiction) as the inversion of nature offering sound (natural; reality)...the many ignore perceivable (sound) when consenting to suggested (words). This represents spell-craft.
The grammar of the many represents the grimoire (invocation) of the few. Alphabet (Latin abecadary) for many represents ABaCadDabra for few. The many read books, while the few spell-bind them in-between covers aka blinders/blinkers for horses etc. Consenting to suggested letters implies LETTING; noun - "allowing movement or passage of something" aka blood-letting aka letting the vampire in etc.
Furthermore...suggested words tempt one to hold onto definitions (definite; affixed), which in return tempts one to ignore that sound moves. Sound (liquid) generates instruments (solid) aka liquid (inception towards death) generating solid (life).
Adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIAN (phonic; sound)...ignoring sound for word based definitions implies DEAF PHONETICIAN (de-fi-ni-tion).
how something means two things
a) If one (perception) ignores oneness (perceivable) for dualism (suggested), then one ignores self (singular) for others (plural).
b) life being moved from inception towards death doesn't imply being in-between two states, but a different unit (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of same motion.
c) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka transmutation of ingredient (growth) out of base (loss). Alchemy.
Only within loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life).
Others suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) as the inversion of transmutation (implies out of; within and in response to everything).
d) consider EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...if energy is one, then what else could be two?
What if...all is one in energy? What if..."all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone...ALL(in)ONE"?
e) being implies one apart from one another...others tempt ones together (many) to remain apart (few). Apartheid (growth) within wholeness (loss).
In short...two only exists if one ignores self for another one. Nature doesn't count, it designates units (Latin unus; one)...others suggest one to count. https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg
f) ME'ANING, noun - "that which exists in the mind, view or contemplation as a settled aim or purpose, though not directly expressed".
Holding onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto. The words upheld within ones mind/memory tempt one to ignore being an instrument within flowing sound.
Consenting to suggested permits those suggesting to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning thereof, while tricking oneself into conflicts of reason (true vs false) against one another over the suggested meaning.
which you seem to definitely grasp
Definite implies affixed; while grasping implies ones choice to hold onto suggested, hence affixing it within ones mind/memory. That's the self imposed slavery permitting others to be masters.
Discerning self to be (life) within change (inception towards death) inspires one to let go of temptations, instead of holding onto them.
Wanting to hold onto an apple makes it poisonous; needing to adapt to hunger makes apples nutritious. Hunger implies ongoing; anything inside ongoing implies temporary...the latter tempts (want); the former inspires one to resist temptation (need). Being implies choice in-between need/want balance.
because I don't grasp it to any significant degree yet
a) others suggest "because" as the inversion of cause (perceivable) towards being (perception). Ones consent to suggested permits those suggesting to shape suggestions (fiction) in the name of perceivable cause (reality).
This tempts one to view reality through the lens of fiction. In "They Live" they made it about fighting others to consent to suggested glasses. In reality...many willingly wear glasses (suggested); ignoring sight (perceivable), while fighting each other (reasoning) over what is being shown to them.
Inspiration (reality) is always available for anyone choosing to resist information (fiction).
For example I can mostly follow along with what you write but I couldn't easily write the same comments.
a) Attempting to follow sameness (inception towards death) destroys differences (life)...resisting sameness grows differences.
b) I adapt to a moving system (sound)...you try to mimic something affixed (words), while affixing it with your consent.
c) WRITTEN aka "laws, statutes; laws enacted by the supreme power and recorded; as contradistinguished from unwritten or common law".
Written implies as suggested by others; common implies as consented to by many...natural implies unwritten. Nature doesn't write books aka compositions bound aka volumes...it sets units (ones) free (choice).
M.A.R.R.S aka mars aka war aka conflict of reason.
If I had to guess
Gambling for suggested outcomes (guess) tempts one to ignore being a "guest" within perceivable origin. Conjecture (guess) tempts one to ignore being in-between injection (inception) and expulsion (death).
you post the comments
a) About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0) + Comment Score (10972)...ask yourself if you view comments as posts?
b) only nature offers (action); those within imply offering (reaction)...reacting to what others are selling (retail) tempts one to ignore what nature is offering (wholesale).
The happy merchant of temptations calls it a "free market"; because ones free will of choice is tempted into a market for buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) of livestock.
as practice
a) Adapting to perceivable inspiration while resisting consenting to suggested information aka frequency of resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
b) PRAC'TICAL, adjective (Latin practicus) - "active use; opposed to speculative"...being implies reactive (life) used by active (inception towards death).
SPEC (special; particular) CUL (culus; fundamental) ATIVE (active; action) aka being particular reaction within foundation of whole action.
to open up others to this way
Only way (inception towards death) opens (inception) and closes (death) wanderers (life). Others tempt one to follow directions, hence tempting one wayward (to turn away) from ones position as resistance within velocity.
my question is...
...a suggested attempt to gain suggested answers, while ignoring to be (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death), hence struggling to sustain self while being dissolved.
Question implies QUAERERE (to seek) TION (action) aka want for outcome, while ignoring need to resist origin. Reaction doesn't need to seek action; it needs to react to being enacted upon.
Others suggest progressivism to tempt one on a quest (questions) for the holy grail (answers), yet whatever one finds will tempt one to seek more, because unlike suggested progressivism...perceivable progress doesn't end; it starts (inception) and ends (death) those living within.
do you have any recommendations for reading resources on this broad topic?
The solution lies within your question...resource aka ones REsponse to perceivable SOURCE, while resisting the suggested answers by others.
how have you developed your ability to see language in this way?
The short version...noticed lies; looked for truth just to find more lies, then questioned if there's any truth that cannot be changed, which in return led me to comprehend being within change (perceivable) while holding onto truth (suggested), which permits others to lie (contradict truth).
This led from natural law over motion to energy and oneness to ones self discernment, all the while working on resisting the temptation to hold onto what others are suggesting. The more one lets go of suggested; the less burden one carries within perceivable.
Reason confines ones mind to conflicts against others; while implication (if/then) allows ones free will of choice to draw from everything (perceivable) nature has to offer...an inexhaustible offer which exhausts those growing within.
Many thanks for any reply or assistance.
Thanks for inspiring me to reply and being implies assisted (inception towards death) stance (life).
The dichotomy shall intensify until cognitive dissonance no longer prevails in the psyche of the people.
DIA (two) LOG (logic/reason) aka a conflict of reason in-between two sides. Ones consent to reason against others over suggested information implies permission (allow) towards others and submission (deny) of self.
As for "now"...before vs after represents the dia-log for each one who willingly ignores that being can only exist now (life); not before (inception) or after (death).
Hey, are you familiar with "sleepydude" on Substack? The guy himself isn't really important to what I'm asking, what's important is he writes about hidden communications in language, right brain language in a sense, how something means two things, which you seem to definitely grasp, even though I only really have an intuitive sense that you grasp it because I don't grasp it to any significant degree yet. For example I can mostly follow along with what you write but I couldn't easily write the same comments. If I had to guess, I'd say you post the comments that you do as practice, and possibly to open up others to this way of thinking about language. So my question is, do you have any recommendations for reading resources on this broad topic? And outside of posting these comments, how have you developed your ability to see language in this way? Many thanks for any reply or assistance.
a) skimmed through it; liked it; bookmarked it. I do season sleeping with naps though.
b) Familiar aka "a spirit called upon" aka a "domestic"...being implies local (life) within domestic (inception towards death), hence needing to adapt (exhale) to impressing (inhale) aka breathing (Latin spiro; spirit; to breathe).
Others suggest "familiar" to destabilize ones local (Latin loco; place; position).
c) If many consent to suggestions by chosen few, then that implies submission to collectivization, hence permitting a chosen few to establish SUB (submissive) STACK (collective). Furthermore...stacking establishes imbalance, hence leading to toppling over upon those willingly submitting under.
Next in line of thinking...stacking high-rises crushes first down-towns and then sub-urbs. Those who stack are "erecting", while cutting off others within "circumference" aka circumcision.
a) ATION (action) reveals reactions. Being implies reaction (life) generated within action (inception towards death) aka expression (temporary growth) within impression (ongoing loss).
Others suggest COMM-UNI-ism aka composition of one (singular) into many (plural). Ones consent to any suggested -ism implies the composition aka the contract between consent and suggested aka ones choice to hold onto what another offers aka ones consent to RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka binding self through mercantile law as buyer (consent) to seller (suggestion).
Meanwhile...nature offers everything (perceivable) to each ones (perception) "free" will of choice. The highest value in perceivable existence implies each ones evaluation thereof...others suggest prices to tempt one to devaluate ones evaluation, when consenting to pay.
Furthermore...suggested "cost" tempts one to ignore perceivable "caust" (burning; corroding). Living within the process of dying implies a "burned offering" (holo-caust). Caust also implies Cause of being.
Sleight of hand: "I will not offer burnt offerings without cost" ~ 1 Chronicles 21:24.
b) LAN'GUAGE, noun (Latin lingua, the tongue, and speech) - "human speech; the expression of ideas by words or significant articulate sounds"
The few suggest speech (artifice; fiction) as the inversion of nature offering sound (natural; reality)...the many ignore perceivable (sound) when consenting to suggested (words). This represents spell-craft.
The grammar of the many represents the grimoire (invocation) of the few. Alphabet (Latin abecadary) for many represents ABaCadDabra for few. The many read books, while the few spell-bind them in-between covers aka blinders/blinkers for horses etc. Consenting to suggested letters implies LETTING; noun - "allowing movement or passage of something" aka blood-letting aka letting the vampire in etc.
Nature doesn't speak...it moves sound (entire) which generates partials (instruments aka in-stru-ments aka minds structured within) aka whole (perceivable) setting itself apart (perception).
Furthermore...suggested words tempt one to hold onto definitions (definite; affixed), which in return tempts one to ignore that sound moves. Sound (liquid) generates instruments (solid) aka liquid (inception towards death) generating solid (life).
Adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIAN (phonic; sound)...ignoring sound for word based definitions implies DEAF PHONETICIAN (de-fi-ni-tion).
a) If one (perception) ignores oneness (perceivable) for dualism (suggested), then one ignores self (singular) for others (plural).
b) life being moved from inception towards death doesn't imply being in-between two states, but a different unit (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of same motion.
c) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka transmutation of ingredient (growth) out of base (loss). Alchemy.
Only within loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life).
Others suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) as the inversion of transmutation (implies out of; within and in response to everything).
d) consider EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...if energy is one, then what else could be two?
What if...all is one in energy? What if..."all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone...ALL(in)ONE"?
e) being implies one apart from one another...others tempt ones together (many) to remain apart (few). Apartheid (growth) within wholeness (loss).
In short...two only exists if one ignores self for another one. Nature doesn't count, it designates units (Latin unus; one)...others suggest one to count. https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg
f) ME'ANING, noun - "that which exists in the mind, view or contemplation as a settled aim or purpose, though not directly expressed".
Holding onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto. The words upheld within ones mind/memory tempt one to ignore being an instrument within flowing sound.
Consenting to suggested permits those suggesting to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning thereof, while tricking oneself into conflicts of reason (true vs false) against one another over the suggested meaning.
Definite implies affixed; while grasping implies ones choice to hold onto suggested, hence affixing it within ones mind/memory. That's the self imposed slavery permitting others to be masters.
Discerning self to be (life) within change (inception towards death) inspires one to let go of temptations, instead of holding onto them.
Wanting to hold onto an apple makes it poisonous; needing to adapt to hunger makes apples nutritious. Hunger implies ongoing; anything inside ongoing implies temporary...the latter tempts (want); the former inspires one to resist temptation (need). Being implies choice in-between need/want balance.
a) others suggest "because" as the inversion of cause (perceivable) towards being (perception). Ones consent to suggested permits those suggesting to shape suggestions (fiction) in the name of perceivable cause (reality).
This tempts one to view reality through the lens of fiction. In "They Live" they made it about fighting others to consent to suggested glasses. In reality...many willingly wear glasses (suggested); ignoring sight (perceivable), while fighting each other (reasoning) over what is being shown to them.
Inspiration (reality) is always available for anyone choosing to resist information (fiction).
a) Attempting to follow sameness (inception towards death) destroys differences (life)...resisting sameness grows differences.
b) I adapt to a moving system (sound)...you try to mimic something affixed (words), while affixing it with your consent.
c) WRITTEN aka "laws, statutes; laws enacted by the supreme power and recorded; as contradistinguished from unwritten or common law".
Written implies as suggested by others; common implies as consented to by many...natural implies unwritten. Nature doesn't write books aka compositions bound aka volumes...it sets units (ones) free (choice).
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9gOQgfPW4Y
Gambling for suggested outcomes (guess) tempts one to ignore being a "guest" within perceivable origin. Conjecture (guess) tempts one to ignore being in-between injection (inception) and expulsion (death).
a) About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0) + Comment Score (10972)...ask yourself if you view comments as posts?
b) only nature offers (action); those within imply offering (reaction)...reacting to what others are selling (retail) tempts one to ignore what nature is offering (wholesale).
The happy merchant of temptations calls it a "free market"; because ones free will of choice is tempted into a market for buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) of livestock.
a) Adapting to perceivable inspiration while resisting consenting to suggested information aka frequency of resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
b) PRAC'TICAL, adjective (Latin practicus) - "active use; opposed to speculative"...being implies reactive (life) used by active (inception towards death).
SPEC (special; particular) CUL (culus; fundamental) ATIVE (active; action) aka being particular reaction within foundation of whole action.
Only way (inception towards death) opens (inception) and closes (death) wanderers (life). Others tempt one to follow directions, hence tempting one wayward (to turn away) from ones position as resistance within velocity.
...a suggested attempt to gain suggested answers, while ignoring to be (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death), hence struggling to sustain self while being dissolved.
Question implies QUAERERE (to seek) TION (action) aka want for outcome, while ignoring need to resist origin. Reaction doesn't need to seek action; it needs to react to being enacted upon.
Others suggest progressivism to tempt one on a quest (questions) for the holy grail (answers), yet whatever one finds will tempt one to seek more, because unlike suggested progressivism...perceivable progress doesn't end; it starts (inception) and ends (death) those living within.
The solution lies within your question...resource aka ones REsponse to perceivable SOURCE, while resisting the suggested answers by others.
The short version...noticed lies; looked for truth just to find more lies, then questioned if there's any truth that cannot be changed, which in return led me to comprehend being within change (perceivable) while holding onto truth (suggested), which permits others to lie (contradict truth).
This led from natural law over motion to energy and oneness to ones self discernment, all the while working on resisting the temptation to hold onto what others are suggesting. The more one lets go of suggested; the less burden one carries within perceivable.
Reason confines ones mind to conflicts against others; while implication (if/then) allows ones free will of choice to draw from everything (perceivable) nature has to offer...an inexhaustible offer which exhausts those growing within.
Thanks for inspiring me to reply and being implies assisted (inception towards death) stance (life).
Wonder if facemasks actually do work against white lung, and covid was just to get ppl to think they don't work.
That'd be a real fkin trip
Because they know no one will ever be punished for what they’ve done.