Notice that they never deny murdering the child, only that it's antisemitic to discuss that they murdered child.
(www.clevelandjewishnews.com)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
what I also find weird is that they tie the word anti-Semitic to the nation of Israel rather than the Jewish people. While there's a lot of crossover, they are not one and the same.
They deliberately conflate and divorce things based on what benefits them best at the moment. Is Jewish a race? A people? A religion? A culture? Yes and no to all of the following depending on ____. Jewish/Hebrew/Judaism/Israel/Semitic what's the difference? Who knows. Only they do. Who is they? That's antisemitic to even ask. What's Semitic? You've been debanked. All your money has been seized.
Not true. as far as I've observed, pretty much every government does this kind of shit. protest at the capitol? it was attack on our democracy! cop kills a black man? it was a white supremacist killing an American hero! black mob kills white kid? it was a mob of unruly youths and the investigation is still ongoing!
Everyone is either a patriot or an enemy at the flip of a switch. this is something that propagandists love doing, and isn't really tied to anyone specific people.
I like to call it "Anti-Semantic" because it appears their kind are afraid of it even if it just looks like what they've identified as the bad one.
Ones consent to suggested pluralism (they) implies conflation (melting together), while ignoring being partial (perception) divorced (separated by dissolution) within whole (perceivable).
Separated (life) by dissolution (inception towards death).
a) Reasoning (yes vs no) about suggested tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
b) Each one knows (perceives) all (perceivable)...unless ignored for the suggestions by one another.
Ones consent to suggested "money" permits others ownership over M_ONE_Y aka MY ONE, hence money representing a suggested ownership transfer of oneself to another...willingly; consensual through bank & TRUST.
What are you on?
a) A suggestion is loose until one ties it by consent.
b) Perceivable sound implies loose; suggested words implies letters bound together. Sound moves; words (definitions aka affixed meaning) tempt one to ignore being (life) moved (inception towards death).
Different partials (ones) can only exist within same whole (one)...all is one in energy aka "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka alone...ALL(in)ONE.
Others suggest nihilism (not) to tempt one to deny perceivable for suggested.
Aka "he that strives (life) with god (inception towards death) and jew (phonetic you)...implies different one within same all.