If many ignore being in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light), then collective ignorance (darkness) rules over partial discernment (brightness).
Being in-between pure light and the absence thereof implies within the visible spectrum of light as a hue (color) man within animal (Latin anima; animation).
a) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies standing under another...which is detrimental to ones own growth.
b) diction implies suggested fiction (words); which tempts one to ignore perceivable reality (sound).
c) others suggest collectivism (theasaurus; treasury; storehouse; repository etc.) as the inversion of nature setting each one within "free" will of choice.
In short...nature doesn't collect together; it sets apart.
[acts surprised when claims are rejected off-hand]
Thanks for admitting the Rothschilds are members of the gore group destroying the world. Thanks for admitting the jesuits have no power whatsoever. Thanks for admitting there are no “aristocrats” in charge.
Fuck off forever, paid jewish shill. No one here will ever believe any of your bullshit.
Empire of the City - Ring of Power (1/4) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8Ihlxqz4FI
If many ignore being in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light), then collective ignorance (darkness) rules over partial discernment (brightness).
Being in-between pure light and the absence thereof implies within the visible spectrum of light as a hue (color) man within animal (Latin anima; animation).
More ignorance; more niggers...you'll see.
a) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies standing under another...which is detrimental to ones own growth.
b) diction implies suggested fiction (words); which tempts one to ignore perceivable reality (sound).
c) others suggest collectivism (theasaurus; treasury; storehouse; repository etc.) as the inversion of nature setting each one within "free" will of choice.
In short...nature doesn't collect together; it sets apart.
How does one make nothing?
that's right
but the rothschilds are not members of the core high ranking members of the aristocrat-jesuit crime group
they were given permission to control the finance sector less than 300 years ago
Why would anyone believe you?
lol this sad shill tactic is just pathetic
LET ME SEW A SEED OF DOUBT
hahaha you need to go do something else...let the next guy on shift try ...maybe he took the latest shill course cause you are way behind
Thanks for admitting that you lied.
Thanks for showing you have nothing to add
Thanks for admitting the Rothschilds are members of the gore group destroying the world. Thanks for admitting the jesuits have no power whatsoever. Thanks for admitting there are no “aristocrats” in charge.
Fuck off forever, paid jewish shill. No one here will ever believe any of your bullshit.
They're still the heads of global zionism and high ranking illuminati members buddy.
And they are still trillionaires who absolutely own this planet.
and? most of what you said is right but so what?
let's say the rothschilds and all of their intermarried family members are put into insane asylums for life
all their bosses do is hand the finance sector to another family....gee mission accomplished not
I am all for dealing with the rothschild tiny-brain family...but either at the same time or first....let's dela with their bosses
No one will ever believe you.
a) Illumination implies being illuminated (reaction) by light (action).
b) suggested agency of (agentur of) tempts one to ignore being regent (life) within agent (inception towards death).
c) "the" implies suggested the-ism aka ones submission to the authority of others.
d) consider ILL LUMEN NAUGHTY...in regard to naught (nothing, in no degree).
IN (being within) NOCERE (harm) aka being (life) within harms way (inception towards death)....who's guilty of ignoring that?