reincarnation is almost the same thing as death if you can't remember anything about a previous life in your next life. Everything that makes you think of yourself as you is based off of your memories. If you have no recollection about your former life, it is pretty much the same thing as death.
a) one can only come (inception towards death) to be (life).
b) others suggest pluralism (they) to distract singular (one) from self.
c) if being (life) implies in (inception) and out (death) of origin; then living growth goes "back to the future" into loss of dying. It's suggested futurism (time to come), which distracts one from coming to be time (particular duration).
Only one within motion (inception towards death) experiences duration (life) of being. Others suggest time (past; present; future) to distract one from being "now" aka within momentum of motion.
Thing is, though, that the actual data for it, that is to say people who have claimed to actually remember past lives, when this is put to the test for specifics and for information that can be verified that they couldn't have known, etc., well those claims fall apart.
However, people who have near death experiences, of which there is a lot of data, do NOT report they are going to be reincarnated, before being yanked back to life on the operating table or some such.
No, it wouldn't be more honest to stay that. We have lots of data on near death experiences, double blind stuff at that, where objects are hidden and those who "died" said they saw things researchers hid in the room. Meanwhile, we have no data on those who say they remember their pasts lives where they can give verifiable details. It's always open ended stuff, that anybody could make up on that spot, like they were a milkmaid in Denmark.
reincarnation is almost the same thing as death if you can't remember anything about a previous life in your next life. Everything that makes you think of yourself as you is based off of your memories. If you have no recollection about your former life, it is pretty much the same thing as death.
a) one can only come (inception towards death) to be (life).
b) others suggest pluralism (they) to distract singular (one) from self.
c) if being (life) implies in (inception) and out (death) of origin; then living growth goes "back to the future" into loss of dying. It's suggested futurism (time to come), which distracts one from coming to be time (particular duration).
Only one within motion (inception towards death) experiences duration (life) of being. Others suggest time (past; present; future) to distract one from being "now" aka within momentum of motion.
Yea, they were called "heresies" and they were defeated by better theology and the use of proper authority.
You'll never know. You lose all your memories.
Thing is, though, that the actual data for it, that is to say people who have claimed to actually remember past lives, when this is put to the test for specifics and for information that can be verified that they couldn't have known, etc., well those claims fall apart.
However, people who have near death experiences, of which there is a lot of data, do NOT report they are going to be reincarnated, before being yanked back to life on the operating table or some such.
No, it wouldn't be more honest to stay that. We have lots of data on near death experiences, double blind stuff at that, where objects are hidden and those who "died" said they saw things researchers hid in the room. Meanwhile, we have no data on those who say they remember their pasts lives where they can give verifiable details. It's always open ended stuff, that anybody could make up on that spot, like they were a milkmaid in Denmark.
There is plenty of evidence that Jesus is the Son of God, none of it conclusive, I'll readily admit, while reincarnation has very little, if any.
Being implies resurrected (inception) body (life) incarnated (inception towards death).
As for christ...birth anoints (consecrated by oil) each one.