I would consider it confirmed. I mean, they won't even put out a statement that says, "Oy vey, that fucking letter is totally fake. But it's exactly how we feel!"
Cause the 'muricans will be the first in and the IDF will be carrying their water. Why do 'muricans need to kill ragheads? We need to put our soldiers on our SOUTHERN BORDER to repel the hordes illegally entering this country. If we can send them into harms way for no appearant reason then we certainly can send them to Texas for a few weeks in the sun.
I would consider it confirmed. I mean, they won't even put out a statement that says, "Oy vey, that fucking letter is totally fake. But it's exactly how we feel!"
Cause the 'muricans will be the first in and the IDF will be carrying their water. Why do 'muricans need to kill ragheads? We need to put our soldiers on our SOUTHERN BORDER to repel the hordes illegally entering this country. If we can send them into harms way for no appearant reason then we certainly can send them to Texas for a few weeks in the sun.
Yawn. Soldiers fight what they're told.
Why does Israel need American troops for Hamas. It doesn't. Why does it stop with Hamas. It doesn't.
At what point how can you effectively get rid of Gaza, expecting the same regional build up to cease?
1 problem at a time. It doesn't work like that even if you cut a deal for 5 political minutes.
At this point if you're addressing it, it becomes exactly what?
It stands to reason any regional build up also goes. Otherwise 5 political minutes later, it has built up more.
How many more does it drag into it?
Obviously at this point, it is providing cover for Israeli Gaza ground operations.
I am simply curious why any regional build up idles and watches even if a deal was cut for 5 political minutes. 5 years later it's back to it.