And everyone who has this off the wall theory that gravity doesn't exist, has yet to prove it doesn't exist....
Actually, you have it backwards. In science we have to prove it does exist first, but that isn't what happened with gravitation. Trying to disprove something that was never proven to begin with is a fools errand.
And all I need to do is throw a rock into the air, and when it comes back down, Proof Gravity does exist....
True. Gravity does exist, and has been a natural/scientific law for at least 2 millennia. It is merely the phenomenon of falling; "What goes up, must come down".
Gravitation on the other hand, the imaginary pseudo force believed and taught as the cause of gravity, is not proven and cannot be proven - because it is, and always was from its initial creation (a few hundred years ago), fiction.
Ask NASA’s top public relations ‘scientist’ to define gravity for you. If he can’t do it, then no one can.
Gravity is simply explained away by the principals of buoyancy and density. A rock falls because it is heavier than the atmospheric oxygen, the medium in which it finds itself in. However, if you through that rock into a pool of Jello, it would float. It’s not because the rock is now suddenly an anti gravity device, it’s because the medium, Jello, is now more dense than the rock. The rock becomes buoyant in that medium. Very simple science that does not require a spinning earth and a magical, physics-breaking force called gravity.
So far, the easiest explanation I have been given::
the other force is electromagnetism, with the air being negative and ground being positive, there is a flow of magnetism that flows from sky to ground.
And it is VERY Close, still the best though....
Look above, or below, to find the full comms on this....
In what way? Could you describe this contradiction? You seem to be under the mistaken, and common, impression that gravity and gravitation are the same thing.
I'd like to say the conversation was stimulating
You might if you tried having a conversation on the topic. I guess we'll never know will we?
But watching you jump through Mental Hoops
Why on earth did you capitalize "Mental Hoops"? Are you a bot?
I understand what you mean, and why you say this - but i disagree on semantic and scientific grounds.
Gravity is a scientific/natural law thousands of years old. It isn't going anywhere, and we shouldn't want it to. It is simply the phenomenon of falling; "What goes up, must come down."
The major modern problem with the word gravity is that is has been erroneously conflated with the cause for the phenomenon in the minds of many misled students. In science (and basic logic), the phenomenon cannot be the cause of itself. Teaching things like this is an attack on science.
that is determined by the electrostatic medium, the sky above is negative charge, the ground below is positive/neutral, and its a small force (1000x stronger than masses attraction, gravity) but it creates the flow from air to ground.
This is possible, but such speculation is usually not helpful - or necessary. Gravity is caused, as you said, when an object weighs more than the media it displaces. Weight is just an intrinsic and inexorable property of all matter.
Before you call it ""Phony"", you should at least be able to disprove it....
And everyone who has this off the wall theory that gravity doesn't exist, has yet to prove it doesn't exist....
And all I need to do is throw a rock into the air, and when it comes back down, Proof Gravity does exist....
Actually, you have it backwards. In science we have to prove it does exist first, but that isn't what happened with gravitation. Trying to disprove something that was never proven to begin with is a fools errand.
True. Gravity does exist, and has been a natural/scientific law for at least 2 millennia. It is merely the phenomenon of falling; "What goes up, must come down".
Gravitation on the other hand, the imaginary pseudo force believed and taught as the cause of gravity, is not proven and cannot be proven - because it is, and always was from its initial creation (a few hundred years ago), fiction.
Thank you for directly contradicting yourself....
I'd like to say the conversation was stimulating, but I'd be lying....
But watching you jump through Mental Hoops is rather entertaining....
Ask NASA’s top public relations ‘scientist’ to define gravity for you. If he can’t do it, then no one can.
Gravity is simply explained away by the principals of buoyancy and density. A rock falls because it is heavier than the atmospheric oxygen, the medium in which it finds itself in. However, if you through that rock into a pool of Jello, it would float. It’s not because the rock is now suddenly an anti gravity device, it’s because the medium, Jello, is now more dense than the rock. The rock becomes buoyant in that medium. Very simple science that does not require a spinning earth and a magical, physics-breaking force called gravity.
So far, the easiest explanation I have been given::
And it is VERY Close, still the best though....
Look above, or below, to find the full comms on this....
Finally we are getting somewhere....
Planets exist. You’re objectively wrong and clinically insane.
In what way? Could you describe this contradiction? You seem to be under the mistaken, and common, impression that gravity and gravitation are the same thing.
You might if you tried having a conversation on the topic. I guess we'll never know will we?
Why on earth did you capitalize "Mental Hoops"? Are you a bot?
Gravitas, Gravity, Gravitation....
Basically, they have commons....
Figure it out....
Yes, and the act that you had to point it out is just proof that I didn't lose....
Contradiction is a bitch, and you used it perfectly....
I understand what you mean, and why you say this - but i disagree on semantic and scientific grounds.
Gravity is a scientific/natural law thousands of years old. It isn't going anywhere, and we shouldn't want it to. It is simply the phenomenon of falling; "What goes up, must come down."
The major modern problem with the word gravity is that is has been erroneously conflated with the cause for the phenomenon in the minds of many misled students. In science (and basic logic), the phenomenon cannot be the cause of itself. Teaching things like this is an attack on science.
This is possible, but such speculation is usually not helpful - or necessary. Gravity is caused, as you said, when an object weighs more than the media it displaces. Weight is just an intrinsic and inexorable property of all matter.
Unironically jump off a cliff, paid shill.
Unironically, the "paid shills" are the ones who respond like you do. Also, as you know - this is a violation of rule #1 here.
Those that can't attack the thought, attack the thinker instead out of desperation. Do better if you can.
Thanks for admitting Earth isn’t flat and gravity is an immutable measured constant.
What, gravity? No, no. Gravity is rule number 4 of the Universe itself. You can’t violate it. You’re powerless.
So stop attacking me, you worthless piece of shit, and start proving your claims.