Meanwhile if you are DRAWING porn of fictional anime characters below 18, you are instantly known as a pedophile.
The UN has no interest in catching child predators than to use pedophilia as THE accusation and degradtion tool. In 1984, your local shitposter is a known child predator, and so is you, but not the Gods who freely rape children.
you will never advance by not knowing the difference between healthy and poison, by not knowing the difference between good and wrong, and by not knowing the difference between moral and immoral, you subhuman shittard who lives on moral relativism which is the main tenant of satanism.
go on and admit it, you're either a cultist or a satanic piece of garbage. because if there is no objective good or bad then Man gets to make it and therefore man is God. and this is what the satanists want
a) motion brings forward (inception) and retrogresses (death) matter (life).
b) will (want) can only exist within need...one needs to resist want.
c) suggested nihilism (never) tempts one to ignore being advanced within everything. Consenting to nihilism implies holding onto (believing) nothingness, which in return tempts one to denial. Natural order cannot be denied by those within...only ignored.
knowing the difference
Knowledge (perceivable) implies moving differences. One can only perceive moving differences...others suggest sameness (e pluribus unum aka out of many one) to distract one from that.
the difference between healthy and poison
Health (inception towards death) generates sickness (life)...sickness struggles to remain healthy.
Remedy (inception towards death) generates poison (life)...poison dissolves within remedy unless resisting.
sameness (inception towards death) generates differences (life).
good and wrong
Good vs bad and right vs wrong implies one reasoning over suggested, while ignoring implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Take an apple and wait...good apple turns into bad apple? Food to worm-food isn't a good vs bad conflict, but the implication (if/then) of form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Ignoring perceivable implication for suggested definitions shapes the conflict.
moral and immoral
Suggested moralism (rules of behavior to follow) tempts one to ignore perceivable MANNER aka manual (life) within automatic (inception towards death), hence in need to manually resist automatic temptation wanted.
Being implies resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...others suggest one to ignore resisting by consenting to follow along.
relativism
Only within absolute (inception towards death) can there be relatives (life)...suggested relativism tempts one to ignore that by relating to others (suggestion), instead of adapting to absolute (perception).
main tenant
TEN'ANT, noun (Latin teneo; to strain, stretch, extend)...being implies tenant (life) within main (inception towards death).
satanism
a) Hebrew satan "adversary, to, oppose"...ones consent (want or not want) to any suggested -ism, tempts one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka into opposing others.
b) being reaction (life) within action (inception towards death) implies adverse aka resistance (growth) in adverse of temptation (loss).
go on
If within motion, then the show must go on.
admit
Suggestion tempts ones admission (consent); perceivable goes through each ones perception with or without consent. Suggested (information) tempts one to hold onto; perceivable (inspiration) needs to be let go.
Instead of admitting suggested, try being WIT (to know; to perceive) within NESS (denoting action).
you're either...or...
From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am; If I wasn't, then why would I say I am?"
From ones perspective: "The way (inception towards death) I am (life)"
In short...all is one in energy.
because...
...tempts one to ignore being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
man is God
Everything (whole) "was" perceivable; before anyone (partial) within can suggest to one another what it "is".
The more one resists the temptation of wanting to define what "is"; the more one can discern self within everything that "was" before one came to be.
what the satanists want
-IST implies ones consent (want or not want) to suggested -ISM...others suggest -isms to tempt one to ignore perceivable need.
no non-dual teacher said that pedophilia is love. they say that everything as a whole is God and it's love. I underline AS A WHOLE.
because yes one can awaken and go beyond good and evil, leaving this world.
yet this doesn't FUCKING MEAN THAT EVIL DOESN'T EXIST. no non-dual teacher said this shit. these people are beyond deluded and they literally believe that all the evil is love so nothing wrong with pedos/rapists/killers they're just God playing a role in a world of dreams 🥰🥰🥰 just wake up bro, it's all a dream 😍🥰🥰, transcend reality by killing yourself with us. (they even had members who killed themselves and they don't care)
Saying implies suggesting what "is" about what "was" perceivable beforehand...it's on oneself to discern that. Ones consent to suggested permits others to define perceivable with it.
I underline AS A WHOLE.
...which ignores that WHOLE cannot be underlined without adding a line to WHOLE, hence contradicting it.
go beyond good and evil
a) good implies "versus" evil and it's ones consent to either suggested side which establishes the versus conflict of reason within self. Nature doesn't brand anything as good or evil...those within pass judgement in form of labels, which tempts them to ignore that nature implies "justice" aka that which "just is".
b) others tempt one to consent to "be yond" aka YOND, adjective - "mad; furious, or alienated in mind; that is, gone, wandering, and allied to the preceding"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/yond
EVIL DOESN'T EXIST
EVIL/LIVE...LOVE/EVOL. One perceives sound; others suggest words to tempt one to ignore that.
dual
Being implies in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested). Choosing to ignore need for want establishes a want vs not want conflict of reason within oneself...that represents the foundation for dualism.
Need (resistance) and want (temptation) aren't dual (two), but ones resistance (life) within all temptation (inception towards death).
Meanwhile if you are DRAWING porn of fictional anime characters below 18, you are instantly known as a pedophile.
The UN has no interest in catching child predators than to use pedophilia as THE accusation and degradtion tool. In 1984, your local shitposter is a known child predator, and so is you, but not the Gods who freely rape children.
name of the cult : Leo Gura from actualized dot org. , he's on YT.
That which grows (life) needs to resist that which advances (inception towards death) to grow further.
you will never advance by not knowing the difference between healthy and poison, by not knowing the difference between good and wrong, and by not knowing the difference between moral and immoral, you subhuman shittard who lives on moral relativism which is the main tenant of satanism. go on and admit it, you're either a cultist or a satanic piece of garbage. because if there is no objective good or bad then Man gets to make it and therefore man is God. and this is what the satanists want
seems so, or some schizotard. I'm not bothering talking with satanic filths who follow the satanic tenants.
a) motion brings forward (inception) and retrogresses (death) matter (life).
b) will (want) can only exist within need...one needs to resist want.
c) suggested nihilism (never) tempts one to ignore being advanced within everything. Consenting to nihilism implies holding onto (believing) nothingness, which in return tempts one to denial. Natural order cannot be denied by those within...only ignored.
Knowledge (perceivable) implies moving differences. One can only perceive moving differences...others suggest sameness (e pluribus unum aka out of many one) to distract one from that.
Good vs bad and right vs wrong implies one reasoning over suggested, while ignoring implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Take an apple and wait...good apple turns into bad apple? Food to worm-food isn't a good vs bad conflict, but the implication (if/then) of form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Ignoring perceivable implication for suggested definitions shapes the conflict.
Suggested moralism (rules of behavior to follow) tempts one to ignore perceivable MANNER aka manual (life) within automatic (inception towards death), hence in need to manually resist automatic temptation wanted.
Being implies resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...others suggest one to ignore resisting by consenting to follow along.
Only within absolute (inception towards death) can there be relatives (life)...suggested relativism tempts one to ignore that by relating to others (suggestion), instead of adapting to absolute (perception).
TEN'ANT, noun (Latin teneo; to strain, stretch, extend)...being implies tenant (life) within main (inception towards death).
a) Hebrew satan "adversary, to, oppose"...ones consent (want or not want) to any suggested -ism, tempts one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka into opposing others.
b) being reaction (life) within action (inception towards death) implies adverse aka resistance (growth) in adverse of temptation (loss).
If within motion, then the show must go on.
Suggestion tempts ones admission (consent); perceivable goes through each ones perception with or without consent. Suggested (information) tempts one to hold onto; perceivable (inspiration) needs to be let go.
Instead of admitting suggested, try being WIT (to know; to perceive) within NESS (denoting action).
In short...all is one in energy.
...tempts one to ignore being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
Everything (whole) "was" perceivable; before anyone (partial) within can suggest to one another what it "is".
The more one resists the temptation of wanting to define what "is"; the more one can discern self within everything that "was" before one came to be.
-IST implies ones consent (want or not want) to suggested -ISM...others suggest -isms to tempt one to ignore perceivable need.
no non-dual teacher said that pedophilia is love. they say that everything as a whole is God and it's love. I underline AS A WHOLE.
because yes one can awaken and go beyond good and evil, leaving this world. yet this doesn't FUCKING MEAN THAT EVIL DOESN'T EXIST. no non-dual teacher said this shit. these people are beyond deluded and they literally believe that all the evil is love so nothing wrong with pedos/rapists/killers they're just God playing a role in a world of dreams 🥰🥰🥰 just wake up bro, it's all a dream 😍🥰🥰, transcend reality by killing yourself with us. (they even had members who killed themselves and they don't care)
Saying implies suggesting what "is" about what "was" perceivable beforehand...it's on oneself to discern that. Ones consent to suggested permits others to define perceivable with it.
...which ignores that WHOLE cannot be underlined without adding a line to WHOLE, hence contradicting it.
a) good implies "versus" evil and it's ones consent to either suggested side which establishes the versus conflict of reason within self. Nature doesn't brand anything as good or evil...those within pass judgement in form of labels, which tempts them to ignore that nature implies "justice" aka that which "just is".
b) others tempt one to consent to "be yond" aka YOND, adjective - "mad; furious, or alienated in mind; that is, gone, wandering, and allied to the preceding"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/yond
EVIL/LIVE...LOVE/EVOL. One perceives sound; others suggest words to tempt one to ignore that.
Being implies in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested). Choosing to ignore need for want establishes a want vs not want conflict of reason within oneself...that represents the foundation for dualism.
Need (resistance) and want (temptation) aren't dual (two), but ones resistance (life) within all temptation (inception towards death).