Why did they do it, though? Money? Gun control? I've heard more theories about it being a blown assassination attempt on some Saudi/UAE guy who was there, and either the shooting was cover or a way to diverge any potential story into a mass shooting. I don't know what happened that night, but I suspect a few people know and will take it to their graves.
I have an alternate theory that there are "good guys" in the US gov and while they'd never admit they've been allowing Isreal/Saudi to do terrorism against us for decades to pull us into unwanted wars, they do try to cover up those terrorisms to avoid the unwanted wars.
Who suggests terrorism and who consents to suggested TERROR (Latin terreo, to frighten; fear) by being afraid? Who but oneself can choose to admit (allow) fear to terrify self?
unwanted wars
What if ones consent (want or not want) to anything suggested (want); while ignoring perceivable (need)...shapes war aka conflicts of reason (want vs not want).
Why did they do it, though? Money? Gun control? I've heard more theories about it being a blown assassination attempt on some Saudi/UAE guy who was there, and either the shooting was cover or a way to diverge any potential story into a mass shooting. I don't know what happened that night, but I suspect a few people know and will take it to their graves.
I have an alternate theory that there are "good guys" in the US gov and while they'd never admit they've been allowing Isreal/Saudi to do terrorism against us for decades to pull us into unwanted wars, they do try to cover up those terrorisms to avoid the unwanted wars.
Who suggests terrorism and who consents to suggested TERROR (Latin terreo, to frighten; fear) by being afraid? Who but oneself can choose to admit (allow) fear to terrify self?
What if ones consent (want or not want) to anything suggested (want); while ignoring perceivable (need)...shapes war aka conflicts of reason (want vs not want).