The mound builders used mainly earth, not stone. They layered it, and then shaped it. They weren't skilled in masonry like the Maya, and Inca.
A ziggurat is like a pyramid.
That picture is Mexico. Not America. In America there are anomalies, but no ziggurats outside of conspiracy.
The conspiratorial ziggurats in America are off the Californian and Florida coasts. Florida has Mayan ruins and it has burial mounds. While New Mexico has a stone city. There is also way up on the East Coast, forget the state but it's in Red Dead Redemption 2, Viking ruins, but they're not. Stone ruins by the Red Indians. There is another Conspiracy on Eldorado where supposedly in Arizona along the Grand Canyon had hidden treasure and mummies. There are many more. But no Ziggurats. Mounds. Supposedly a huge stone/megalithic wall running across a particular state. Nobody built, buried.
In South and Central America in the rainforest, are entire cities still buried by the jungle. One was discovered since lidar, it is huge. Buried under the jungle. Ziggurats etc.
Ah, I understand your meaning now. There are significant complex structures in North America, but I think you're right, I don't recall ever saying something that could be described as purely ziggurat. There are still many large mounds that have never been unearthed though.
Absolutely it as you said thousands of mounds and I actively watch the documentaries suggested I find it fascinating.
There are many anomalies in North America.
But ziggurat there have been largely conspiratorial. There are several reasons for it. However any anomalies are becoming much harder to write off. Like the former giants. Where evolution won that narrative. In doing so purged them globally. It purged a lot more evidence about the Red Indian there, simply because as nomadic hunter gathers, it easily claimed colonisation.
Yah, for sure. I LMAO at anyone saying "hunter-gatherer" in context of things like ziggurats and other ancient mega structures. People who are hunting and gathering and cooking all day don't have the time or technology for the millions of tons of stone cutting, carving, moving, etc.
I think it's all pre-flood civilization which was way more advanced than we are taught.
Your mistaken. There are over 6000 mounds in North America. Check out Randall Carlson's podcast, Kosmographia.
A mound is not a Ziggurat.
The mound builders used mainly earth, not stone. They layered it, and then shaped it. They weren't skilled in masonry like the Maya, and Inca.
A ziggurat is like a pyramid.
That picture is Mexico. Not America. In America there are anomalies, but no ziggurats outside of conspiracy.
The conspiratorial ziggurats in America are off the Californian and Florida coasts. Florida has Mayan ruins and it has burial mounds. While New Mexico has a stone city. There is also way up on the East Coast, forget the state but it's in Red Dead Redemption 2, Viking ruins, but they're not. Stone ruins by the Red Indians. There is another Conspiracy on Eldorado where supposedly in Arizona along the Grand Canyon had hidden treasure and mummies. There are many more. But no Ziggurats. Mounds. Supposedly a huge stone/megalithic wall running across a particular state. Nobody built, buried.
In South and Central America in the rainforest, are entire cities still buried by the jungle. One was discovered since lidar, it is huge. Buried under the jungle. Ziggurats etc.
Ah, I understand your meaning now. There are significant complex structures in North America, but I think you're right, I don't recall ever saying something that could be described as purely ziggurat. There are still many large mounds that have never been unearthed though.
Absolutely it as you said thousands of mounds and I actively watch the documentaries suggested I find it fascinating.
There are many anomalies in North America.
But ziggurat there have been largely conspiratorial. There are several reasons for it. However any anomalies are becoming much harder to write off. Like the former giants. Where evolution won that narrative. In doing so purged them globally. It purged a lot more evidence about the Red Indian there, simply because as nomadic hunter gathers, it easily claimed colonisation.
Yah, for sure. I LMAO at anyone saying "hunter-gatherer" in context of things like ziggurats and other ancient mega structures. People who are hunting and gathering and cooking all day don't have the time or technology for the millions of tons of stone cutting, carving, moving, etc.
I think it's all pre-flood civilization which was way more advanced than we are taught.