The mound builders used mainly earth, not stone. They layered it, and then shaped it. They weren't skilled in masonry like the Maya, and Inca.
A ziggurat is like a pyramid.
That picture is Mexico. Not America. In America there are anomalies, but no ziggurats outside of conspiracy.
The conspiratorial ziggurats in America are off the Californian and Florida coasts. Florida has Mayan ruins and it has burial mounds. While New Mexico has a stone city. There is also way up on the East Coast, forget the state but it's in Red Dead Redemption 2, Viking ruins, but they're not. Stone ruins by the Red Indians. There is another Conspiracy on Eldorado where supposedly in Arizona along the Grand Canyon had hidden treasure and mummies. There are many more. But no Ziggurats. Mounds. Supposedly a huge stone/megalithic wall running across a particular state. Nobody built, buried.
In South and Central America in the rainforest, are entire cities still buried by the jungle. One was discovered since lidar, it is huge. Buried under the jungle. Ziggurats etc.
Ah, I understand your meaning now. There are significant complex structures in North America, but I think you're right, I don't recall ever saying something that could be described as purely ziggurat. There are still many large mounds that have never been unearthed though.
Absolutely it as you said thousands of mounds and I actively watch the documentaries suggested I find it fascinating.
There are many anomalies in North America.
But ziggurat there have been largely conspiratorial. There are several reasons for it. However any anomalies are becoming much harder to write off. Like the former giants. Where evolution won that narrative. In doing so purged them globally. It purged a lot more evidence about the Red Indian there, simply because as nomadic hunter gathers, it easily claimed colonisation.
Yah, for sure. I LMAO at anyone saying "hunter-gatherer" in context of things like ziggurats and other ancient mega structures. People who are hunting and gathering and cooking all day don't have the time or technology for the millions of tons of stone cutting, carving, moving, etc.
I think it's all pre-flood civilization which was way more advanced than we are taught.
Who knows except it was America that was directly hit. North America was ground zero. Like it was with the bullshit dinosaurs in the continental split. The Mexico crater. Perspective on the size of its Crater, covers an area greater than the size of London.
The Greenland crater caused that cataclysm where an Iron meteor, or a comet hit the planet. They've been discovering its fragments since the 1800s, and found the crater, officially this millennium last decade, but that argument raged for the last 150 years, and think they knew more prior. The meteor/comet broke up on entry, up and down the East Coast, as far in as the Rockies. Probably impacted far more, globally. The same Iron fragments had been turning up for over 100 years in North America. A Scandinavian/Dutch /European team reported the crater
Yes currently, Mayans were the most advanced, because Egyptian pyramids hadn't been built, and Indians have been dismissed, despite of their recordings.
What occurred was existential, pockets of people survived in various places.
Don't quote me, look it up. It's still a theory. But there's the presumed Greenland crater. It is supposedly all of 11000-12000 years old. It is enormous. It certainly proves what our ancient races have all said.
A mound is not a Ziggurat.
The mound builders used mainly earth, not stone. They layered it, and then shaped it. They weren't skilled in masonry like the Maya, and Inca.
A ziggurat is like a pyramid.
That picture is Mexico. Not America. In America there are anomalies, but no ziggurats outside of conspiracy.
The conspiratorial ziggurats in America are off the Californian and Florida coasts. Florida has Mayan ruins and it has burial mounds. While New Mexico has a stone city. There is also way up on the East Coast, forget the state but it's in Red Dead Redemption 2, Viking ruins, but they're not. Stone ruins by the Red Indians. There is another Conspiracy on Eldorado where supposedly in Arizona along the Grand Canyon had hidden treasure and mummies. There are many more. But no Ziggurats. Mounds. Supposedly a huge stone/megalithic wall running across a particular state. Nobody built, buried.
In South and Central America in the rainforest, are entire cities still buried by the jungle. One was discovered since lidar, it is huge. Buried under the jungle. Ziggurats etc.
Ah, I understand your meaning now. There are significant complex structures in North America, but I think you're right, I don't recall ever saying something that could be described as purely ziggurat. There are still many large mounds that have never been unearthed though.
Absolutely it as you said thousands of mounds and I actively watch the documentaries suggested I find it fascinating.
There are many anomalies in North America.
But ziggurat there have been largely conspiratorial. There are several reasons for it. However any anomalies are becoming much harder to write off. Like the former giants. Where evolution won that narrative. In doing so purged them globally. It purged a lot more evidence about the Red Indian there, simply because as nomadic hunter gathers, it easily claimed colonisation.
Yah, for sure. I LMAO at anyone saying "hunter-gatherer" in context of things like ziggurats and other ancient mega structures. People who are hunting and gathering and cooking all day don't have the time or technology for the millions of tons of stone cutting, carving, moving, etc.
I think it's all pre-flood civilization which was way more advanced than we are taught.
Who knows except it was America that was directly hit. North America was ground zero. Like it was with the bullshit dinosaurs in the continental split. The Mexico crater. Perspective on the size of its Crater, covers an area greater than the size of London.
The Greenland crater caused that cataclysm where an Iron meteor, or a comet hit the planet. They've been discovering its fragments since the 1800s, and found the crater, officially this millennium last decade, but that argument raged for the last 150 years, and think they knew more prior. The meteor/comet broke up on entry, up and down the East Coast, as far in as the Rockies. Probably impacted far more, globally. The same Iron fragments had been turning up for over 100 years in North America. A Scandinavian/Dutch /European team reported the crater
Yes currently, Mayans were the most advanced, because Egyptian pyramids hadn't been built, and Indians have been dismissed, despite of their recordings.
What occurred was existential, pockets of people survived in various places.
Don't quote me, look it up. It's still a theory. But there's the presumed Greenland crater. It is supposedly all of 11000-12000 years old. It is enormous. It certainly proves what our ancient races have all said.