I've come to believe in non-local consciousness, or consciousness that originates outside our physical bodies and outside our brains. To me, this is the most scientifically sound explanation.
Believing implies ones consent to suggested collectivism. Those who consent hold onto suggested information; while those suggesting it are aggregating/collecting those who consent.
conscious
CON (with) SCIO (knowledge) aka being within (perception) knowledge (perceivable)...others utilize suggestion to distract ones awareness thereof.
our explanation
EX (life) within PLAN (inception towards death) of TION (action) implies ones singular reaction aka free will of choice...suggested collectivism/pluralism (our) tempts singular (one) to ignore this.
https://www.insider.com/studied-near-death-experiences-our-explanation-of-consciousness-is-wrong-2023-9?amp
Saw it myself on salvia
Believing implies ones consent to suggested collectivism. Those who consent hold onto suggested information; while those suggesting it are aggregating/collecting those who consent.
CON (with) SCIO (knowledge) aka being within (perception) knowledge (perceivable)...others utilize suggestion to distract ones awareness thereof.
EX (life) within PLAN (inception towards death) of TION (action) implies ones singular reaction aka free will of choice...suggested collectivism/pluralism (our) tempts singular (one) to ignore this.