https://dailycaller.com/2023/09/24/nasa-capsule-asteroid-samples-4-billion-mile-journey/
NASA’s OSIRIS-REx has successfully marked an impressive feat as its capsule safely touched down Sunday morning, carrying valuable samples collected from the asteroid Bennu.
OSIRIS-REx marked the conclusion of an extraordinary odyssey spanning approximately four billion miles over the course of seven years. These invaluable samples from the asteroid Bennu were meticulously collected by OSIRIS-REx spacecraft, which executed a precise maneuver by flying near Earth in the early hours of Sunday morning. The spacecraft then released the capsule, which descended to a landing zone located in the Utah desert. It was reported that the capsule landed at 8:52 a.m. MT, three minutes ahead of the scheduled landing time.
OSIRIS-REx embarked on a journey from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida back in September 2016, and boarded a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket. This started the two-year odyssey with a destination set for the 1,720-foot wide asteroid known as 101955 Bennu. When the team touched down in Bennu’s vicinity in August 2018, the spacecraft dedicated another two years to closely study the asteroid’s surface.
Upon the successful completion of its comprehensive study, the spacecraft approached the surface of asteroid Bennu to retrieve samples. In 2021, once the samples from Bennu were securely stored in a return capsule, OSIRIS-REx activated its propulsion system and began a lengthy journey spanning 1.2 billion miles back to Earth. (RELATED: NASA Predicts When Massive Asteroid Will Hit Earth. But Are They Sure?)
After its successful return, OSIRIS-REx will set sail on another journey, this time destined for a different asteroid.
Song for the occasion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh5yJG7No3w
Morality has little, if anything to do with it. I want conspiracies to be a place to discuss conspiracies and related topics. You want it to be a place with vapid shitposting.
What "argument"? Nothing has changed at all. You posted junk that wasn't appropriate on the community and i called you out - end. There isn't any argument at all.
Out of curiosity, what "argument" do you think there was initially, and when did it change?
Repeating your subjective standards over and over again doesn't change the fact that they are subjective.
You're not even aware of how you've shifted your argument? Sheesh.
The community rules are in the sidebar. It's rule #1. It's objective enough for our purposes, and has nothing to do with me.
There is no argument. You made a shitpost, i called you out. No argument whatsoever.
I am only curious what argument you think there was initially and what you believe it changed into. Can you really not describe it at all? Doesn't that worry you?
The words "for out purposes" is doing some very, very heavy lifting if you think it applies to this situation. Nowhere do I personally attack anybody, and moreover, when I was slightly disrespectful to you, I recognized that I was, and I apologized, which you accepted.
No, you didn't "call me out" you're attempting to impose your subjective standards. And since you're not a mod....
And I don't "think" you changed your argument, you did change your argument.
I only meant, "in this context". Sorry for the confusion.
Rule #1 is : "Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person."
It is clear that you are both not being respectful (further, have the explicit intention of being disrespectful) and are attacking the people who hold a particular view rather than the view itself. I only added the verbiage that confused you to acknowledge that "respect" is a subjective term, but is perfectly objective enough in this case.
It is the explicit purpose of your shitpost. There is no reason not to recognize and admit it. Because your attack is directed at many people rather than a singular "anybody" does not make it better (nor can you earnestly argue that it ever could) or somehow not a violation of rule #1.
True, and this was/is appreciated.
Rule #1 is not particularly subjective in this context. This was a shitpost directed to explicitly annoy people who have a view you don't like. You are not addressing their argument(s) in any way and instead attacking them.
Besides it being a violation of rule #1 (and more importantly, in my view) your post had nothing to do with conspiracies, was a mean spirited waste of everyones time, and generally makes the community worse in every way.
Again, there was never any argument.
Does it bother you that you are unable to put into words the specific argument you believe was made and what it changed into? It would bother me.
How can anyone rationally respond to a view you can't articulate?