https://dailycaller.com/2023/09/24/nasa-capsule-asteroid-samples-4-billion-mile-journey/
NASA’s OSIRIS-REx has successfully marked an impressive feat as its capsule safely touched down Sunday morning, carrying valuable samples collected from the asteroid Bennu.
OSIRIS-REx marked the conclusion of an extraordinary odyssey spanning approximately four billion miles over the course of seven years. These invaluable samples from the asteroid Bennu were meticulously collected by OSIRIS-REx spacecraft, which executed a precise maneuver by flying near Earth in the early hours of Sunday morning. The spacecraft then released the capsule, which descended to a landing zone located in the Utah desert. It was reported that the capsule landed at 8:52 a.m. MT, three minutes ahead of the scheduled landing time.
OSIRIS-REx embarked on a journey from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida back in September 2016, and boarded a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket. This started the two-year odyssey with a destination set for the 1,720-foot wide asteroid known as 101955 Bennu. When the team touched down in Bennu’s vicinity in August 2018, the spacecraft dedicated another two years to closely study the asteroid’s surface.
Upon the successful completion of its comprehensive study, the spacecraft approached the surface of asteroid Bennu to retrieve samples. In 2021, once the samples from Bennu were securely stored in a return capsule, OSIRIS-REx activated its propulsion system and began a lengthy journey spanning 1.2 billion miles back to Earth. (RELATED: NASA Predicts When Massive Asteroid Will Hit Earth. But Are They Sure?)
After its successful return, OSIRIS-REx will set sail on another journey, this time destined for a different asteroid.
Song for the occasion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh5yJG7No3w
I only meant, "in this context". Sorry for the confusion.
Rule #1 is : "Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person."
It is clear that you are both not being respectful (further, have the explicit intention of being disrespectful) and are attacking the people who hold a particular view rather than the view itself. I only added the verbiage that confused you to acknowledge that "respect" is a subjective term, but is perfectly objective enough in this case.
It is the explicit purpose of your shitpost. There is no reason not to recognize and admit it. Because your attack is directed at many people rather than a singular "anybody" does not make it better (nor can you earnestly argue that it ever could) or somehow not a violation of rule #1.
True, and this was/is appreciated.
Rule #1 is not particularly subjective in this context. This was a shitpost directed to explicitly annoy people who have a view you don't like. You are not addressing their argument(s) in any way and instead attacking them.
Besides it being a violation of rule #1 (and more importantly, in my view) your post had nothing to do with conspiracies, was a mean spirited waste of everyones time, and generally makes the community worse in every way.
Again, there was never any argument.
Does it bother you that you are unable to put into words the specific argument you believe was made and what it changed into? It would bother me.
How can anyone rationally respond to a view you can't articulate?
I'm wondering, at this point, why I'm even bothering to respond to you, and why, at this point, you keep harping on the same points you've been shown are entirely your opinion?
Only you can answer that question, friend :) You certainly don't have to respond, and never did!
Just clarifying. You were confused that there was some sort of "dynamic argument", and/or that i was perhaps mischaracterizing the explicitly stated purpose of your post (i.e. merely to annoy / attack, not a conspiracy nor for the purposes of discussing conspiracy).
The latter views - that conspiracy should be a place to discuss conspiracy and related topics and not a steaming pile of shitpost garbage - sure, admittedly that is my opinion (and hopefully one that the mods, and even you - share).
But the primary view that your post is both disrespectful and an attack against those that hold a particular view (as opposed to an attack against their view, which is permitted - and by me, encouraged) - is not an opinion. It objectively (and rather explicitly) violates rule #1, though for some reason you don't want to admit that to yourself.
You're putting a lot of effort into these replies, and I'm not even reading them anymore. The charitable thing for me to do it at least tell you.