854
01:09:58,108 --> 01:10:02,571
Yes. And then, my dear, Jesus goes on to tell Mary Magdalene...
...that it's up to her to continue his Church.
Mary Magdalene, not Peter.
The Church was supposed to be carried on by a woman.
Few realize that Mary was descended from kings, just as her husband was.
Now, my dear, the word in French for Holy Grail.
From the Middle English "Sangreal"...
...of the original Arthurian legend.
Now, as two words. Can you translate for our friend?
Sang real, it means "royal blood".
When the legend speaks of the chalice that held the blood of Christ...
...it speaks in fact of the female womb that carried Jesus' royal bloodline.
But how could Christ have a bloodline, unless...?
Mary was pregnant at the time of the Crucifixion.
For her own safety and for that of Christ's unborn child...
...she fled the Holy Land and came to France.
And here, it is said, she gave birth to a daughter, Sarah.
They know the child's name.
- A little girl.
- Yes.
If that were true, it's adding insult to injury.
Why?
The pagans found transcendence through the joining of male to female.
People found God through sex?
In paganism, women were worshiped as a route to heaven...
...but the modern Church has a monopoly on that...
...in salvation through Jesus Christ.
And he who keeps the keys to heaven rules the world.
Women, then, are a huge threat to the Church.
The Catholic Inquisition soon publishes...
...what may be the most blood-soaked book in human history.
The Malleus Maleficarum.
The Witches' Hammer.
It instructed the clergy on how to locate, torture and kill...
...all freethinking women.
In three centuries of witch hunts...
...50, 000 women are captured, burned alive at the stake.
Oh, at least that. Some say millions.
Imagine, then, Robert...
...that Christ's throne might live on in a female child.
You asked what would be worth killing for.
Witness the greatest cover-up in human history.
This is the secret that the Priory of Sion...
...has defended for over 20 centuries.
They are the guardians of the royal bloodline.
The keepers of the proof of our true past.
They are the protectors of the living descendants of Jesus Christ...
...and Mary Magdalene.
There is zero evidence that Mary Magdalene and Jesus had any relationship other than the Son of God to one of his followers.
The book was, and is, a big fat lie. It was a decent movie, pacing and acting by Hanks. Spawned a whole genre of subpar garbage mystery thrillers like National Treasure with Nick Cage of all people. But...it was all fiction. Always was.
well how come you're getting that file with the bloodlines family tree.. this isn't bullshit, man. Lemme get that again.
https://media.scored.co/post/FtZXQiQCbxw5.jpeg
You want "editing" out of shit.. go see the real bible. lol. Here's that segment from da vinci code about them editing out shit. Like come on.
709
01:01:29,391 --> 01:01:33,228
The Good Book did not arrive by facsimile from heaven.
The Bible as we know it was finally presided over by one man:
The pagan emperor Constantine.
I thought Constantine was a Christian.
Oh, hardly, no. He was a lifelong pagan...
...who was baptized on his deathbed.
Constantine was Rome's supreme holy man.
From time immemorial...
...his people had worshiped a balance between nature's male deities...
...and the goddess, or sacred feminine.
But a growing religious turmoil was gripping Rome.
Three centuries earlier...
...a young Jew named Jesus had come along...
...preaching love and a single God.
Centuries after his crucifixion...
...Christ's followers had grown exponentially...
...and had started a religious war against the pagans.
Or did the pagans commence war against the Christians?
Leigh, we can't be sure who began the atrocities in that period.
We can at least agree that the conflict grew to such proportions...
...that it threatened to tear Rome in two.
So Constantine may have been a lifelong pagan...
...but he was also a pragmatist.
And in 325 anno Domini...
...he decided to unify Rome under a single religion, Christianity.
Christianity was on the rise. He didn't want his empire torn apart.
And to strengthen this new Christian tradition...
...Constantine held a famous ecumenical gathering...
...known as the Council of Nicaea.
And at this council...
...the many sects of Christianity debated and voted on, well...
...everything, from the acceptance and rejection of specific gospels...
...to the date for Easter...
...to the administering of the sacraments, and of course...
...the immortality of Jesus.
I don't follow.
Well, ma chère, until that moment in history...
...Jesus was viewed by many of his followers as a mighty prophet...
...as a great and powerful man, but a man nevertheless.
A mortal man.
Not the Son of God?
Not even his nephew twice removed.
Constantine did not create Jesus' divinity.
He simply sanctioned an already widely held idea.
Semantics. No, it's not semantics. You're interpreting facts to support your own conclusions.
Fact: For many Christians, Jesus was mortal one day and divine the next.
For some Christians, his divinity was enhanced.
Absurd. There was a formal announcement of his promotion.
They couldn't even agree on the Nicene Creed!
Excuse me. "Who is God, who is man?"
How many have been murdered over this question?
As long as there has been a one true God...
...there has been killing in his name.
Yes, the book slanders Christ and Christendom as a whole. What’s your point?
I did, however, steal this line for my book.
Yes, check out the Book of Mary, she was more in Jesus's confidence and higher in spirituality than any of the other apostles.
There is debate about the bloodline, if Jesus had a kid. Possibly related to Rh-. Perhaps MM was already rh-