Spirituality, philosophy, and mind-manipulation in academia?
I have become quite interested in the intersection between let's say spirituality/spiritual manipulation/spiritual mind-control, political mind control, and left-wing academic/educational mind control. It's a bit hard to get at, but I strongly suspect there is something there. For one thing, I go to a university where the teacher who is the most creepy-culty-indoctrinatey-type teacher I've ever had (a psychology teacher, with a particularly dogmatic/brainwashy attitude around radical gender ideology stuff) also was revealed by another teacher to be a former Satan worshipper (which she told him in turn she wished he hadn't shared and basically that she wanted him to keep it a secret going forward). Obviously that's just an anecdote but it struck a chord with me somehow. Another data point I have in this area is the connection between Alfred Kinsey, an academic who seemed to want to disrupt agreed upon norms around sex/masturbation in the culture and who also had some sort of creepy connection to Allister Crowley, who though I'm no expert seems to be basically some kind of dark occultist/possible satanist and who also had his own unconventional sex stuff going on.
I also watched the show "The Sinner" recently and it was kind of fascinating to see these very particular ideas around "transcending"/subverting morality/right-and-wrong show up so explicitly within the context of what seems to me to be left-wing propaganda while also of course containing pro-queer propaganda as part of that (season 3 of The Sinner literally is about showing parallels between queerness and being a murderous amoral person who is deep into the Nietzschean philosophy of "transcending" right and wrong and seems to basically subtly/perniciously make the case that both are good and wise and spiritual and cool actually and if you question that you are an ignorant, an idea further propped up at the beginning of season 4 if you wanna get the full effect).
This idea of subverting fundamental metaphysical binaries seems to be showing up in the culture/zeitgeist both in terms of blurring the lines between right and wrong and in terms of blurring the lines between male and female in the same kind of weird parallel motion and it seems to me to be coming down through systems of education and mainstream media and also maybe to some extent through therapy/the field of psychology (at least this is a hypothesis I have in regards to psychology).
I also think it is interesting to notice that foucault, who seems to be largely responsible for getting people to question the idea of truth as a valid concept in universities, also buys into and spreads his version of being "beyond" a good and evil binary while probably also being a pedophile... this may be a false inference I suppose but you can seemingly/arguably look at his arguments as a defense of pedophilia as not being wrong/bad. It seems like maybe there's a broader/deeper thing going on there too with French-philosophers-who-subvert-basic-truth-reality-and-morality-norms also being pedophiles/involved with pedophilia. I'll admit I need to look into this more.
Anyway, Nietzche and Foucault are obviously both pretty anti-God so there's your tie in with the spiritual dimension there.
It seems to me that there is some kind of pattern here and I just am wanting to know if there's any other data-points in this area y'all might be aware of? Thanks in advance to everyone who responds. I love you all.
I don't know, maybe you should ask Betty May who publicly exposed the beast aka wickedest man in the world, after he brutally murdered her husband Raoul Loveday with his luciferian magick in the abbey of thelema.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AZW7SCOWvSaO/
I hadn't heard of Betty May.
Crowley was quite the character.
Remember when he casually murdered that Indian guy in front of witnesses and no one cared. That's just how it was back then. And today. Life is cheap.
Modern occultists/Crowley followers downplay his racism and those unsavory bits of his character.
.... which now that I think of it, it's funny. Because Crowley delighted in being called the Beast and seen as 'evil' and now followers think his racism was shameful and has to be hidden so it doesn't tarnish his reputation. 😄😄😄
Anyway, there are much worse people than Crowley. He was just more theatrical and in your face with his marketing.
Betti(ng) May expose addiction...
Like Hitler did to the jews?
Knowledge implies perceivable; don't (doing nothing) represents suggested nihilism. Consenting to the suggestion (he brutally murdered) by another (betty may) tempts one to ignore perceivable.
As for Crowley...why hide something so deep (astrology) under something so shallow (satanism)?
Seriously dude, Crowley called himself the beast, not because of astrology but because he actually was a luciferian "qabbalist" master illumini that used magick for horrible sex rituals, and he also permanently opened portals to summon evil spirits aka demons, who literally wrote his books for him (while being possessed).
Now, what do all holy manuscripts tell you about the use of white/black magick? Scriptures tells us that any form of magick is strictly forbidden by God our one and only creator.
Nature doesn't call by name; it orders by designating units apart from one another. Suggested "beast" represents a compound of individual units aka BE (being) AST (astute), which implies being able to discern.
Calling oneself "beast" tempts others to ignore self (be) discernment (ast).
Being (alive) implies within cause (inception towards death). ASTRO (star) can be utilized to discern ones position as center of surrounding; while LOGY (logic/reason + logos/words) tempts one into a conflict (reason) about suggested definitions (words).
Once again..."astrology" implies a compound distracting from individual units, and it's on oneself to discern that.
a) spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies solid (life) adapting within liquid (inception towards death).
b) demon (Latin dai-mon; divider-provider) implies divided solid (life) within providing liquid (inception towards death).
Using words as labels; definitions (definite; affixed) distracts one from that which one tries to define with labels...which is moving.
a) one can neither perceive white (pure light); nor black (destitute of light) since ones perception exists within perceivable spectrum, hence in-between white/black (balance) as spectrum; specter; observer (choice).
b) MAGIC (art of influencing hidden natural forces)...ones consent to suggested (artificial) tempts one to ignore perceivable (natural). Ignorance hides natural (spectrum) underneath artificial (black vs white).
Sleight of hand by Michael Jackson: (before jews) - "It doesn't matter if you're black or white" (after jews) - "Kick me, kike me; don't you black or white me".
c) strict implies restricted; being implies "free" will of choice. Choosing to bind self by consent to suggestions of others implies restricting self.
b) forbid implies FOR (forwards) BID (request aka response to suggested quest towards outcome). Being implies resisting (life) forwards temptation (inception towards death).
The opposite of bidding towards suggested outcome implies replying to perceivable origin.
If one creates, then one creates more than one. Only within oneness (whole) can ones (partials) transmute other ones. Others suggest creationism (out of nothing) to distract from perceivable transmutation (partials within whole).
The foundation for creationism (out of nothing) implies nihilism (nothing), hence ones ignorance of everything (perceivable reality) for nothing (suggested fiction).