I don't know which is dumber. The Children's book or Stonehenge
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
You're wording it different, but Ralph Ellis says people were exiled up there. Michael Tsarion points out queen Scotia has Nova Scotia named after her. There was trade, and interaction.
No. Wrong, fables. Celts were Greek descent, they were in Northern Italy, stretching accross Europe, not goths or visgoths different, Celts were who Rome destroyed in England with the druids, prior to them I call them Turkic because it's a much larger region. This same region same DNA has been found in South American ziggurats. Same red hair mummies in the pyramids. Also in Siberia. They weren't Black.
As far as the bullshit on Scotland hahaha. Modern fantasy. Complete conjecture. Nefertiti probably wasn't black either. That's the little myth you're spewing. A cousin escaped Egyptian civil war, and went to Ireland then Scotland. Because of its name. Ridiculous. As bad as that children's book.
Greek that comparison always was, not just because of our current royals. But there was the fable UK was Atlantis. No. Spain had its descendants. Particularly on Irish Neolithic stuff, it has lots untouched, unlike Britain's destroyed. Apart from the obvious hoax Stonehenge. But that comparison is the above Turkic people. King Midas tomb is the same burial mounds. Same burial mounds, all up the black sea, Europe, France. Etc
Stop calling everyone that learned different aspects of this topic names, and learn. That's what you're here for, right? I cited sources. If you don't like it, you know where to look to point to errors. Just blanketly noping everyone so you can argue isn't very smart. When you get caught up in your feelings for what should be an interesting discussion is it's also the first sign you're having an issue.
I said there was trade, and interaction. Anything else you're arguing is you arguing with yourself.
I reply in kind. Read what they wrote to me. I responded like so. Did I call you a name? No, you were polite up until now. So when somebody called me a name I responded, yes, in kind, like so. Same tone. Same insult. Same names.
Now you've gone and taken offense for neanderthals? You're also calling me names. Read it.
Conversation is suddenly picking me out for responding, because you've taken offense, why. Not at their language. Neanderthals it must be. Why can't everybody on the planet be what? You tell me your offense. It's irate. Why you believe in that. Suddenly you're taking offense. You weren't originally? Why now?
Stonehenge simple truth they added stones more and more and more continuing until recently. Where they want to add more. At what point was it anything else? They added all this stuff. So they aligned it. Obviously. At what point, come on, was it real? Hint it wasn't. So what if it ruins.
But sure enough they can pinpoint a bananasaur. Suggesting Lucy spawned the Planet out of Africa. A big volcano erupted and out popped Lucy evolving. How did they find Lucy. They used Dowsing. They literally had a team with a y branch. We need to find Lucy because it's the stinking link, we've struck gold. They had natives, petrified rock hunters licking the stones, like in the temple of doom. That one tastes like a zebra, but that one is a hominid. I swear. We need too proves it. A hominid sells for multi millions. A y branch dowsing, a team of natives licking stones, some clever sculpting later, here we are guys, you're all a bunch of monkeys. It's made us gold. They do it with the Bananasaurs. It has a carbon content I know let's create a monster. A monster that doesn't function outside of stupid CGI.
I have not called you names, or taken offense. I enjoy our chats, and I know that none of us always respond the same. Your ups and downs can be very extreme. I meant my comment to be a helpful warning.